From: Convention of States Action
To: David Lifferth,
Subject: HJR 8 – Convention of States Resolution (Amending Convention)
Date: Sat Feb 27 22:13:39 MST 2016
Body:
Dear Representative Lifferth,

I write today to clarify two misconceptions:
  • An Article V Convention is NOT a Constitutional Convention, it is an Amending Convention.
“There can, therefore, be no comparison between the facility of affecting an amendment, and that of establishing in the first instance a complete Constitution.” Alexander Hamilton
  • Justice Antonin Scalia’s remarks on a “Constitutional Convention.”
He was strongly opposed to a convention for the purpose to write a “Constitution.”  He actually advised a convention of states action as provided in Article V…"a targeted amendment that were adopted by the states.” That is the definition of an Article V Convention. He explains, “I figured out at one time what percentage of the populist could prevent an amendment to the Constitution and if you take a bear majority in the smallest states, by population, I think something less than two percent of the people can prevent an amendment to the Constitution.  “That’s, it ought to be hard, but it shouldn’t be that hard.”
An America where the citizens are afraid or unwilling to use Article V of the Constitution is a dangerous place, for the federal government has no bounds, no restraint and no limits.

Let’s move forward with saving our children’s liberty and vote for HJR 8. That’s something that Alexander Hamilton and Justice Antonin Scalia both support.
 
Mark Meckler                       
President, Citizens for Self-Governance
mark@mecklermail.com

Rep. Ken Ivory 
Utah House District 47
kivory@le.utah.gov
Copyright © 2016 Convention of States Action, All rights reserved.
The Convention of States Project

Our mailing address is:
Convention of States Action
100 Congress Ave.
Suite 2000
Austin, TX 78701

Add us to your address book


Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list