From: tolovelife8
To: Brad Wilson, Joel Briscoe, Dean Sanpei, Rebecca Houck, Jack Draxler, Brian King, David Lifferth, Patrice Arent, Edward Redd, Scott Sandall, Jim Dunnigan, Francis Gibson, State H, Tenth Judge, Dian Reham,
Subject: RE: Violation of the law by state actors ..
Date: Thu Apr 16 22:13:24 MDT 2015
Body:
Now I come before you inregards to David Tafoya at the dl division he refuses to give me an email address for me to discover evidence to the actions of slc then and now .... and at the same time moving for the seconded seat of said office he will not except the evidence in the action before Wallie Wintal the former Director of the dl division ! The refusal to submit to a breathalyzer for blowing 0.00 more than one time and th refusal to take evidence to this fact by actor for the state in violation of the code to gather all and any information whether if it convicts and or vindicates ! This is the very same action The agent for the state David tafoya has engaged in again ! Post agreement ! Between me and the state in and thought actors for the state the laws have not changed to the contrary or cant they private law is strictly forbidden in this state ! 


Sent from my Boost phone



-------- Original message --------
From: tolovelife8 <tolovelife8@hotmail.com>
Date: 04/16/2015 11:12 AM (GMT-07:00)
To: Statej <bradwilson@le.utah.gov>,State M <jbriscoe@le.utah.gov>,State <dsanpei@le.utah.gov>,State O <rchouck@le.utah.gov>,Statena <jdraxler@le.utah.gov>,State A <briansking@le.utah.gov>,Stategd <dlifferth@le.utah.gov>,State B <parent@le.utah.gov>,Stateke <eredd@le.utah.gov>,Stateg <ssandall@le.utah.gov>,State <jdunnigan@le.utah.gov>,Stateh <fgibson@le.utah.gov>,State H <mnoel@kanab.net>,Tenth Judge <ebel_chambers@ca10.uscourts.gov>,Dian Reham <drshow@wamu.org>
Subject: RE: Violation of the law by state actors ..



I now pace pro sea demands before this body 
One to make it a fact of law that the accused has the right to challenge allegations of wrong doing with the brain scan lie detector test when a person tells the truth the brain lights up in four places and three more when you lie a fact of science may I remind you of the 1920 rulling of the supreme court of the federal union.  
This is to be a right of defence also any person convicted of a crime has the right to challenge the conviction with the right of defence ! A false conviction is a true crime against humanity ! And I also state that any actor for the state has said right of defence . And in the matters of child abuse and or neglect the child should be protected as they are to be the prevailing party in all official proceedings of the state pre the ruling of David K Winder this dose stand on the oldest jus Blanca ruling of all time the mother case one mother would have the child cut in half where the other would lose her life with the child to save the childs life this is a princable of the LDS faith save your life lose it lose your life save it .. so in this I state that an acuser of the abuse of a minor child must get in the brain scan and the accused has the right of defence ! The greatest form of abuse of a child is false allegations of abuse and most of all a false conviction based on the false allegations of abuse ! Fasle alagations in a justice court is a felony beacuse of the 242USCA abuse of the LDS people and the crimes against humanity committed against them and J Smith the president of the LDS church and so now we go to the same violation in this state the man arested for the kidnaping od Elisabeth Smart within the law of this state and peace officer must gather all and any information whether if it convicts and or vindicates a person he died in jail ! With no ground to incarcerate him and within the law the jail must provide medical care ! 
On what legal grounds was he in jail ? Hwere is the real facts he was held on was he placed in jail pri sea ? You can not arrest and incarcerate a pro sea at bar ! And I now go to the ruling of Judge Ritter in 1963 and the ruling of the supreme court of federal union in 1968 now I ask you how the juges in the slc justice court can refuse a defendent the right to an attorney because they are not going to jail ? All is see is harmful mistake in the law and a bunch of thinking errors ...again I ask how this man in the smart case was legally in jail by fact of law and by real facts of evidence ... now may I remind you of the arrest of judge ward and the city attorney for the sale of drugs ! And the attorney for the city making and saling durgs was the attorney in place to defend peace officers with alagations of wrong doing ! Hum a criminal defending officers accused of worng doing it office this is in violation of the color of law ! And is a crime within this state and the federal union ! As cited ! This is a pro sea writ ! You may not omit it in your office ! 
I now ask all of you in the legslivative boy where is yiur right of abuse the ? Hum where is your right to violate my right privileges immunities and my nautal liberties ? With your office and action within your office ? Where is your right to demish my quality of life ? Or even legislate my ealry death from you office in and through your simple authority to act ? Or remove any of my rights privileges immunities and liberties my natural liberty most of all given dy consitutianl fact of law ? 
I am comaded within my religion to seek my cures in the herbs ! You may not take action agansit this ! Or fail to take action in defence of my natural liberty ! Or rights or privileges and immunities ! Doing so makes you the enemy within ! Rather the servant of the people and the bastions of the law ! Now we go to the judiciary in the founding of this state the judiciary is only given the simple authority to act with the power of the court ! They now clame power and authority to act also politics are strictly forbidden within the court room and the judiciary violates the judicial code all the time and omit the letter of the law when practicing the law and engage I. Politics in the court room and bring their personal opinion in to the court room and rule against long staing facts of law they have no right of abuse of office ! The law in this state for the use of deadly force is with an obvious danger to ones self ! Not a persumed danger caused by ones self ! Or the wilful endangerment of ones self ot gain the right of self defense ! An officer must treat yiu as you are innocent until they have real facts to the contary ! Again where where the real facts int he smart case the have said person in jail where he died ! How was the city in full compliance with the letter of the law ! And or its actor's ! All state actor mus have perfect adherence to the letter of the law ! They have no right of abuse of the law nor may the act within the ignorance of the law and excuse their actions ! 

Sent from my Boost phone



-------- Original message --------
From: tolovelife8 <tolovelife8@hotmail.com>
Date: 04/16/2015 10:14 AM (GMT-07:00)
To: Statej <bradwilson@le.utah.gov>,State M <jbriscoe@le.utah.gov>,State <dsanpei@le.utah.gov>,State O <rchouck@le.utah.gov>,Statena <jdraxler@le.utah.gov>,State A <briansking@le.utah.gov>,Stategd <dlifferth@le.utah.gov>,State B <parent@le.utah.gov>,Stateke <eredd@le.utah.gov>,Stateg <ssandall@le.utah.gov>,State <jdunnigan@le.utah.gov>,Stateh <fgibson@le.utah.gov>,State H <mnoel@kanab.net>,Tenth Judge <ebel_chambers@ca10.uscourts.gov>
Subject: Violation of the law by state actors ..


I now come before you in and through my political power and authority . Based on Art 1 .....
I now place all of you on notice you are bound by oath and or affirmation to uphold defend and exercise the law and to have perfect adherence to the full body of the law 
The constitution's of the federal union and this state rule supreme and the moral majority simply rules and you are a servant of the pro sea with no political power and authority your authority is on loan to you it is a simple authority to act and it is on loan to you from the pro sea UTis a por sea state . Your simple authority is given by prinacables alone and can be taken by prinacables alone . You are bound to the dictates of the constitution's of the federal union and this state.  And must uphold both laws at the same time per the constitutional marriage within this state's constitution in between the federal union and this state.  It can not be revoked by either party it just is .. 
You my not pass a law that put a person and or a group at an automatic legal disadvantage per the dictate of the constitution of the federal union you are bound to perfect adherence within this state's constitution
Also within the constitution of this state once a right isenumerated within the law of this state it was is and shall always be a right ..  And private law is strictly forbidden within the constitution of this state. .. 
Therr are private laws in place.. they must be removed by fact of law that you are bound to that do violate the founding gound of this state ... you must act by the nature of office. To violate the nature of office is a crime in this state ... also within the simple extension of the civil code the criminal code you may not excuse your actions in court based on your ignorance of the law a fact of law and in title 78-5-503 any false misleading inconsistent material statements in an official proceeding of this state is a felony. 
You may not endanger my life by official proceedings and put me at an automatic legal disadvantage within the law of this state. 
UT is a King James Law State . You are bound to the founding ground of this law .
King James Law is a jus Blanca Ruling by the two high crowns of the house of Oldenburg the bringers of democracy in the modern world starting with the mother of democracy Denmark. KING JAMES and CHRISTIAN III are whom made said rulling and placed democracy in the UK.
These men are my grandfather's ! As well as CHRISTIAN 9th of Denmark . Edward Lyon aka Edward DeBoye oh now I ask you why there is a lyon house hear in UT.
Also my I point out my grandfather's have always come to the aide of the Freeman of this nation and this state .
Denmark sent the royal marines Boye ura semper fi ! Is what they call out .. as they do today just the same the lyon is the body of democracy in Denmark ... 
Now I come to you with the violation of vol18 sec 2384USCA 242USCA 245USCA by state actor's  
I now point out the violation of the state actors
One the willful and knowing violation of David K Winder's judgement and ruling and agreement in the David c vs the state ... by the AG's office the district attorney and the city attorney in and for the city of slc 
Princess Dagmar Ayden Raina deBoye Faulkner and Godrun Emma Raina deBoye know to the state by virtue of abuse and neglect was sexually abused in the custody of the state and a none home state ! This is a clear violation of the adoption and child welfare of 1980 and the abuse prevention and treatment act.  All state actors are bound to the above constitutional laws ! As you are just the same any attorney that dose come in contact with a gross miscarriage of justice must act and do so forthwith with no delay .. as a fact of law in the attorney code of ethics within rule 7 
Also I am now pointing out that it is a felony to bring unfounded charges to a justice court.  
And it is a felony within the abuse and neglect reporting law of this state not to act on a report of abuse and or neglect by a state actor in fact the pro sea immunities on loan to the judiciary is supened in this one matter ... no state actor has any immunity within the bounds of this fact of law ... 
And in fact the immunity act of this state does require that the state actor is acting in good faith and from the higher ground it is a prince John law only a defacto agent for the state would account for their actions with said law rather than account within the full body of the law and I have state actor's knowningly and willingly violating the law citing the immunity act of 1978 
As grounds for their action one in child protective services ! And the AG's office the district attorney office the slc attorney office and so on and in violation of the rulling of David K Winder chief justice of the federal district court at the time of the case and the AG office did provide false and misleading inconsistent material statements before the federal court in the David c vs the state .. and they have also violated the ruling of the higher court also .. 
You also must act when you discover a gross miscarriage of justice as per the founding ground of this state.  
As actors for the state and the servants of the pro sea UT is a true democracy and you have no rule over the people whom reside in this state .. again UT is a pro sea state ..
In the founding princables of this state I have the right to prosecution and the political power and authority to act within this state . Any thing to the contrary is private law and thus is forbidden and is unconsitutenal
l within this state and nation 
Now I point iut to you that the federal judges are bound to the constitution of this state and the laws wherein . 
One because many of the safty control device's are based on the supreme court's ruling .. in the 1890's where they overturned the territory judge ruling for the use of private law and personal belief's religious beliefs so on this in in the judges code of ethics fact of law ! And henc David K Winder ruled the state did violate constitutional law federal and state statute federal and state and acts of congress ... 
And the supreme court did rule you can not break the law to uphold the law you are bound to this ruling
Now I ask how courts of no record can exist in this state and nation when the constitution of this state state they are unconsitutenal ? !
So this state closed circuit court to opne courts of no record how done comply with the letter of the law in this state and this nation the failure to comply with the law is a violation of vol18 sec 2384USCA 242USCA and so on . I demand an answer ! Of how the actions of this legislative body are in full and complete compliance with the law of this state and the federal union as dictated by the consitutianl marriage within this state's constitution ...each and every actor in this body is on notice you are bound to perfect adherence by fact of law and you and or any actor for the state my not ivory tower them selfs for the pro sea 
More to come 


Sent from my Boost phone