From: Will Melton
To: Ronda Menlove, David Lifferth, Jack Draxler, Curt Webb, Jacob Anderegg, Ryan Wilcox, Gage Froerer, Jeremy Peterson, Dixon Pitcher, Brad Dee, Richard Greenwood, Paul Ray, Brad Wilson, Steve Handy, Stewart Barlow, Roger Barrus, Jim Nielson, Becky Edwards, Doug Sagers, Susan Duckworth, Jennifer M. Seelig, rchouch, Joel Briscoe, Angela Romero, Mike Kennedy, brianking, Lee Perry, Janice Fisher, Larry Wiley, LaVar Christensen, Craig Hall, Johnny Anderson, markwheartly, Patrice Arent, cmoss, Eric Hutchings, Jim Dunnigan, dmmcay, Jim Bird, Earl Tanner, Tim Cosgrove, Steve Eliason, Marie Poulson, Ken Ivory, Keven John Stratton, Robert Spendlove, Richard Cunningham, Greg Hughes, John Knotwell, Kraig Powell, John G. Mathis, Kay Christofferson, Brian Greene, Jon Cox, Val Peterson, Dana Layton, Keith Grover, Jon Stanard, Dean Sanpei, Rebecca Lockhart, Francis Gibson, Michael Mckell, Marc Roberts, Merrill Nelson, Jerry Anderson, Kay Mciff, John Westwood, mnoel, Lowry Snow, Don Ipson,
Subject: Oppose HB134 and SB220
Date: Fri Mar 07 19:29:54 MST 2014
Body:
Vote No

House Bill 134 S1: Gun Safe Registration and Anti-Gun Propaganda Distribution
by statuator  Steve Eliason, house district 45, "Republican".
Summary:   This bill would utilize the government's concealed carry "permit" extortion process to offer perverse financial incentives to businesses that sell gun safes.  It would also appropriate tax monies to notoriously anti-gun bureaucracies for dubious "gun safety" programs, and create a de facto gun safe registration program for those who foolishly participate.
Status: This bill was  unanimously approved by  House Monarchess  Rebecca Lockhart's hand-picked  health and human services committee and is currently in the rules committee  awaiting potential floor action.  Vote NO

Vote No SB 220
The practical implication of Sen. Bramble's bill as written are very dangerous for gun owners. 
Almost any allegation against you, no matter how baseless, could result in you being charged with a class C misdemeanor simply for openly carrying or displaying your gun.
And if you actually have to use or display your firearm for defense -- you could open yourself to even more legal issues. 
Gun owners should be very skeptical about SB-220. 

Thank you for your consideration,
Will Melton