From: JONATHAN PETERSON
To: Todd Weiler,
Subject: get me a debate group and see if I can deliver the message of broken equality with facts and logic, my brother Weiler.
Date: 5/4/2014 10:20:40 PM
Body:
Real changes normally take many years.  We don't have many years to do that slow grind out survival issues time.
We must defend constitutional equality between all citizens under all laws now. This will not be easy to begin because of instinct's power over status quo operations. But now we have the knowledge that is what is happening to any societal group of humans.
This knowledge can free us to correct our unlawful use of bribery and slavery/drug laws that violate our most prized principle of democracy. OUR EQUALITY UNDER ALL LAWS MUST BE PRESERVED.
Sincerely,  Jonathan L. Peterson.   No prof of law or Utah senate or house member wants a debate with me on these two violations of equality. I have tried and it is not happening so far.

You want to put the fear of God in them? Which every public official should have anyway. Ask to debate voter equality broken with proof of intent to commit  bribery by corporations. WHICH CORPORATIONS? EVERYONE THAT OPERATE UNDER CORPORATE MISSION LAWS,...TO PROTECT SHARE HOLDERS MONEY FROM FRUAD OR EMBEZZLEMENT. I MUST BE FOR PROFIT OR HUMANITARIAN EXPDENDATURES ONLY.
So intent to commit bribery is easy to prove. ANY CRAPPY DOJ Attorney could convict every congressman in office. WE Don't want them to go to jail, because they believed their bribery was lawful. BUT PUT AN END TO CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS A CHILD COULD UNDERSTAND.
Sincerely,
Jonathan L. Peterson
Behavior Research for Humanity LLC.
3670 Red Maple Rd. (765e.)
Salt Lake City, UT 84106   208-650-1346 ph.   (or P.O. Box 802, SLC,UT 84101)    jlp1997@msn.com
I am a public official under oath (or may become one) and must have an opinion about the use of money or promises to influence any public official in the discharge of his or her public or legal duties.
I agree that corporate political contributions are not lawful and violate state and federal bribery statutes because of "corporate mission laws" that protect share holders funds (from fraud/embezzlement); funds must  be spent on profit, potential profit or humanitarian expenditures only. So intent cannot be freedom of speech but seeking influence for profit.
Name(print)___________________Sign_____________________date_____
If you believe that corporate contributions are lawful: Sign down here instead:
Name(print)____________________Sign____________________date____
BRIBERY:  The offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting of something of value for the purpose of influencing the action of an official in the discharge of his or her public or legal duties.....................unlawful by constitutional Equality Under All Laws..      (created Feb. 14, 2014)