To: Sen. Weiler, T.,
Subject: Attn. Utah Supreme Courts: Evidence of crimes against Utah citizenship in the media...Easter posts on facebook 4-20-2014 See Glen Beck, huffpostpolics, Mormon.org, colbertreport, washingtonpost, the message is clear we have been sheep.
Date: 2014-04-20T20:22:43Z
Body:
Utah Supreme Court please review the papers I have written in behalf of Utah voters, as their rights are being violated by corporate bribery and unconstitutional drug laws. A debate is needed and now your responsibility as well as mine.
CHIEF JUSTICE MATTHEW B. DURRANT
ASSOCIATE CHIEF JUSTICE RONALD E. NEHRING JUSTICE CHRISTINE M. DURHAM JUSTICE THOMAS R. LEE JUSTICE JILL N. PARRISH
thank you for your time Utah Supreme Court Justices in reviewing the evidence proving violations of constitutional equality between citizen members.
Sincerely,
Jonathan L. Peterson
Behavior Research for Humanity LLC.
3670 Red Maple Rd. (765e.)
Salt Lake City, UT 84106 208-650-1346 ph. (or P.O. Box 802, SLC,UT 84101) jlp1997@msn.com
From: jlp1997@msn.com
To: dersh@law.harvard.edu; articleschair@harvardlawreview.org
Subject: Brother Alan M. Dershowitz I am calling you out for a debate. I hope you are having a good day.DFW: Easter posts on facebook 4-20-2014 See Glen Beck, huffpostpolics, Mormon.org, colbertreport, washingtonpost, the message is clear we have been sheep. face the nation, meet the press and many more.
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 20:10:30 +0000
CHIEF JUSTICE MATTHEW B. DURRANT
thank you for your time Utah Supreme Court Justices in reviewing the evidence proving violations of constitutional equality between citizen members.
Sincerely,
Jonathan L. Peterson
Behavior Research for Humanity LLC.
3670 Red Maple Rd. (765e.)
Salt Lake City, UT 84106 208-650-1346 ph. (or P.O. Box 802, SLC,UT 84101) jlp1997@msn.com
From: jlp1997@msn.com
To: dersh@law.harvard.edu; articleschair@harvardlawreview.org
Subject: Brother Alan M. Dershowitz I am calling you out for a debate. I hope you are having a good day.DFW: Easter posts on facebook 4-20-2014 See Glen Beck, huffpostpolics, Mormon.org, colbertreport, washingtonpost, the message is clear we have been sheep. face the nation, meet the press and many more.
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 20:10:30 +0000
Prof. Alan M. Dershowitz,
A constitutional debate is needed over our bribery and slavery laws.
Please go to https://www.facebook.com/HuffPostPolitics, face the nation, meet the press. and many many more.
The amazing one is probably https://www.facebook.com/thecolbertreport and https://www.facebook.com/ibmwatson ALL ARE ON FACEBOOK, I Can't get my papers published any other way.
That will change soon.
I hope to hear from you. I do admire much of your work. Not all but a lot of it.
Sincerely,
Jonathan L. Peterson
Behavior Research for Humanity LLC.
3670 Red Maple Rd. (765e.)
Salt Lake City, UT 84106 208-650-1346 ph. (or P.O. Box 802, SLC,UT 84101) jlp1997@msn.com
(one of the tools I will use during our debate)
From: jlp1997@msn.com
To: info@whitehouse.gov; press@hatch.senate.gov; saltlakecity@ic.fbi.gov; inspector.general@usdoj.gov; nsapao@nsa.gov; niasc@nsa.gov; niarl@tycho.ncsc.mil; customercare@nsa.gov; selinux-team@tycho.nsa.gov; askcaeia@nsa.gov; hq-publicaffairs@usace.army.mil
Subject: Easter posts on facebook 4-20-2014 See Glen Beck, huffpostpolics, Mormon.org, colbertreport, washingtonpost, the message is clear we have been sheep.
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 18:41:02 +0000
==================================
=================================
A constitutional debate is needed over our bribery and slavery laws.
Please go to https://www.facebook.com/HuffPostPolitics, face the nation, meet the press. and many many more.
The amazing one is probably https://www.facebook.com/thecolbertreport and https://www.facebook.com/ibmwatson ALL ARE ON FACEBOOK, I Can't get my papers published any other way.
That will change soon.
I hope to hear from you. I do admire much of your work. Not all but a lot of it.
Sincerely,
Jonathan L. Peterson
Behavior Research for Humanity LLC.
3670 Red Maple Rd. (765e.)
Salt Lake City, UT 84106 208-650-1346 ph. (or P.O. Box 802, SLC,UT 84101) jlp1997@msn.com
(one of the tools I will use during our debate)
I am a public official under oath (or may become one) and must have an opinion about the use of money or promises to influence any public official in the discharge of his or her public or legal duties.
I agree that corporate political contributions are not lawful and violate state and federal bribery statutes because of "corporate mission laws" that protect share holders funds (from fraud/embezzlement); funds must be spent on profit, potential profit or humanitarian expenditures only. So intent cannot be freedom of speech but seeking influence for profit.
Name(print)__________________________________Sign_________________________date_____
If you believe that corporate contributions are lawful: Sign down here instead:
Name(print)__________________________________Sign__________________________date____
BRIBERY: The offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting of something of value for the purpose of influencing the action of an official in the discharge of his or her public or legal duties.....................unlawful by constitutional Equality Under All Laws.. (created Feb. 14, 2014)
From: jlp1997@msn.com
To: info@whitehouse.gov; press@hatch.senate.gov; saltlakecity@ic.fbi.gov; inspector.general@usdoj.gov; nsapao@nsa.gov; niasc@nsa.gov; niarl@tycho.ncsc.mil; customercare@nsa.gov; selinux-team@tycho.nsa.gov; askcaeia@nsa.gov; hq-publicaffairs@usace.army.mil
Subject: Easter posts on facebook 4-20-2014 See Glen Beck, huffpostpolics, Mormon.org, colbertreport, washingtonpost, the message is clear we have been sheep.
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 18:41:02 +0000
HuffPost Politics shared a link.
His comments came during a speech at the University of Tennessee's law school.
Scalia Suggests Students 'Revolt' If Taxes Get Too High
www.huffingtonpost.com
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia told law students that they should consider a "revolt" if taxes become too high. While speaking last week at the Universit...
227 people like this.
Jonathan Peterson Someone should ask Justice Scalia if Corporate bribery and Drug laws VIOLATE CITIZEN EQUALITY? I don't think he understands our true reality.
Jonathan Peterson Why citizens haven't revolted already? They can't because status quo operations are being protected by Satan/hardwired instinctual behavior mechanism, doing its survival based job.
see https://www.facebook.com/ibmwatson
see https://www.facebook.com/ibmwatson
2 of 265
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HuffPost Politics shared a link.
The First Family is celebrating at the Nineteenth Street Baptist Church in Washington, D.C.
Obama Family Celebrates Easter Sunday
www.huffingtonpost.com
The Obama family is celebrating Easter Sunday at Nineteenth Street Baptist Church alongside 250 other congregants and led by the Rev. Dr. Derrick Harkins. Acc...
1,443 people like this.
Jonathan Peterson If people truly understood Jesus Christ's message? It was of tolerance, charity, love for thy neighbor as much as one self.
That is the most moral objective for anyone's life. There would be no hungry, homeless, uneducated, without medical or dental, ...See More
That is the most moral objective for anyone's life. There would be no hungry, homeless, uneducated, without medical or dental, ...See More
2 of 292
================================
================================
HuffPost Politics shared a link.
Just say no to these 11 arguments against legalizing marijuana.
The 11 Stupidest Arguments Against Legalizing Marijuana
www.huffingtonpost.com
Nearly 80 years ago, the feature film "Reefer Madness" hit theaters, projecting demonstrably false anti-marijuana propaganda all over the big screen.
467 people like this.
Jonathan Peterson Until all citizens share equality under all U.S. laws there will not be fair and just treatment of all citizen members.
Drug laws violate equality: Slave/master groups, drug monopoly with elite citizenship powers, forced to purchase temporary written permission to treat one's own pain.
THAT CANNOT POSSIBLE BE CONSTITUTIONAL, EXCEPT TO SHEEP.
Drug laws violate equality: Slave/master groups, drug monopoly with elite citizenship powers, forced to purchase temporary written permission to treat one's own pain.
THAT CANNOT POSSIBLE BE CONSTITUTIONAL, EXCEPT TO SHEEP.
Christine Rose Schulze This rediculous propaganda was conceived by Hearst and others in with interests in the paper industry. There was a study in the late twenties that predicted hemp wpuld replace trees entirely by the 50s and also espoused the possibilities of growing it to replace cotton and man made fabrics. Man made fabric being a chemical industry boon, hemp never had a chance.
2 of 124
HuffPost Politics shared a link.
"Celebrate cannabis, but protest prohibition. That's what 4/20 is about."
'Prince Of Pot' Spends Last 4/20 In Prison
www.huffingtonpost.com
Vancouverites will be smoking pot by the thousands at their annual 4/20 rally on Sunday while one of the men who made their celebration possible spends his last ...
267 people like this.
Jonathan Peterson Something is deceiving us. People in jail for committing no other crime than drug possession is not lawful. One may possesses any commodity without purchased written permission. Which is a form of slavery or bondage to a monopoly group. No one gets special privileges in a democracy.
Script powers were abolished hundreds of years ago, because it gave one group power to use unfair taxation over the poor. It was a hidden taxation without representation. NOT CONSTITUTIONAL.
Script powers were abolished hundreds of years ago, because it gave one group power to use unfair taxation over the poor. It was a hidden taxation without representation. NOT CONSTITUTIONAL.
HuffPost Politics shared a link.
Unbelievable.
Apparently, We Need To Remind People That Pro-Choice Women Are Allowed To Have Babies
www.huffingtonpost.com
Chelsea Clinton is pregnant, and some anti-abortion activists responded to the news Thursday by showing they don't understand what being "pro-choice" means: bein...
1,298 people like this.
Jonathan Peterson I requested IBMWatson to run some simple probability questions. (Watson's logic is not affected by instinct)
This was one of the questions:... Is the beginning of life at its conception or absolute starting point of activity?
(these are the other 4 questions, I am waiting on Watson's answers?)
1- Is corporate political donations bribery and violates constitutional rule of law by violating citizen equality?
2- Is the "Controlled Substance Act" a violation of constitutional rule of law by violating citizen equality? 3- Is hardwired instinctual behavior mechanism an advanced self-duplicating artificial intelligence program based on survival logic?
5- Did God/advanced intelligence create Instinctual behavior mechanism? / Did instinctual behavior mechanism create itself?
____Those probability questions answered, should prove that my theories are reality and we Prepare for the coming of our Lord
This was one of the questions:... Is the beginning of life at its conception or absolute starting point of activity?
(these are the other 4 questions, I am waiting on Watson's answers?)
1- Is corporate political donations bribery and violates constitutional rule of law by violating citizen equality?
2- Is the "Controlled Substance Act" a violation of constitutional rule of law by violating citizen equality? 3- Is hardwired instinctual behavior mechanism an advanced self-duplicating artificial intelligence program based on survival logic?
5- Did God/advanced intelligence create Instinctual behavior mechanism? / Did instinctual behavior mechanism create itself?
____Those probability questions answered, should prove that my theories are reality and we Prepare for the coming of our Lord
Jonathan Peterson Ask your Mama..NY Times/ Hilary Clinton do you understand our bribery Laws? Open your mouth and share your expert opinion with the world. This little survey about bribery law is not being answered by any under oath of office. ?This information should not be withheld from the public, sincerely, Jonathan, defending our constitution for the United States of America.
IT IS THE JOB OF THE PRESS TO ASK THIS QUESTION:
Sen. Mike Lee, HOW DO YOU RESPOND TO THIS SURVEY FOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS UNDER OATH? (I talked to his staff at the capital) Sen. Lee has the Survey that proves corporations are committing bribery. It asks for opinion if he/she agrees with our US Supreme courts, as freedom of speech or agrees Corp. Mission Laws prove intent to commit bribery laws. Sen. Lee and Utah senate and house members refuse to give their statement of beliefs. Demand everyone of them state on the record if our laws are being broken or not.
The survey is a part of this CREDO petition or print the document listed below it. http://www.credomobilize.com/.../end-corporate-use-of...
Dear Governor Gary R. Herbert, Utah Senate, Utah House and Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes:
The question is simple and straight forward:
Is the act of giving or receiving gifts or promises with the intent to influence a public official unlawful?
Answer the 1 question survey and honor your oath of office. Please return survey to me?
If intent is provable beyond any reasonable doubt: then such practices must be prosecuted, bribery is a crime against our citizen membership.
Gross misconduct and ethics violations are the least of the charges that should and must be fully investigated/prosecuted by those having authority over such inexcusable behaviors as to accepting or supporting bribery. Bribery is unlawful. The law of bribery is an act against citizen voter equality. Equality of voter powers is the cornerstone of our democracy under a constitution.
We have been silent, those of us who are under constitutional oath of office. Never again can we allow our rules of conduct to be openly violated without voicing our objection in the most vigorous ways at our disposal. We are citizens of the United States of America and by law, constitutional law, must defend each other's rights to the fullest extent available, within the laws we swore to uphold. Sincerely,
Jonathan L. Peterson
Behavior Research for Humanity LLC.
3670 Red Maple Rd. (765e.)
Salt Lake City, UT 84106 208-650-1346 ph (or P.O. Box 802, SLC,UT 84101) jlp1997@msn.com
I am a public official under oath (or may become one) and must have an opinion about the use of money or promises to influence any public official in the discharge of his or her public or legal duties.
I agree that corporate political contributions are not lawful and violate state and federal bribery statutes because of "corporate mission laws" that protect share holders funds (from fraud/embezzlement); funds must be spent on profit, potential profit or humanitarian expenditures only. So intent cannot be freedom of speech but seeking influence for profit.
Name(print)________________________Sign__________________date_____
If you believe that corporate contributions are lawful: Sign down here instead:
Name(print)________________________Sign___________________date____
BRIBERY: The offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting of something of value for the purpose of influencing the action of an official in the discharge of his or her public or legal duties.....................unlawful by constitutional Equality Under All Laws.. (created Feb. 14, 2014)
IT IS THE JOB OF THE PRESS TO ASK THIS QUESTION:
Sen. Mike Lee, HOW DO YOU RESPOND TO THIS SURVEY FOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS UNDER OATH? (I talked to his staff at the capital) Sen. Lee has the Survey that proves corporations are committing bribery. It asks for opinion if he/she agrees with our US Supreme courts, as freedom of speech or agrees Corp. Mission Laws prove intent to commit bribery laws. Sen. Lee and Utah senate and house members refuse to give their statement of beliefs. Demand everyone of them state on the record if our laws are being broken or not.
The survey is a part of this CREDO petition or print the document listed below it. http://www.credomobilize.com/.../end-corporate-use-of...
Dear Governor Gary R. Herbert, Utah Senate, Utah House and Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes:
The question is simple and straight forward:
Is the act of giving or receiving gifts or promises with the intent to influence a public official unlawful?
Answer the 1 question survey and honor your oath of office. Please return survey to me?
If intent is provable beyond any reasonable doubt: then such practices must be prosecuted, bribery is a crime against our citizen membership.
Gross misconduct and ethics violations are the least of the charges that should and must be fully investigated/prosecuted by those having authority over such inexcusable behaviors as to accepting or supporting bribery. Bribery is unlawful. The law of bribery is an act against citizen voter equality. Equality of voter powers is the cornerstone of our democracy under a constitution.
We have been silent, those of us who are under constitutional oath of office. Never again can we allow our rules of conduct to be openly violated without voicing our objection in the most vigorous ways at our disposal. We are citizens of the United States of America and by law, constitutional law, must defend each other's rights to the fullest extent available, within the laws we swore to uphold. Sincerely,
Jonathan L. Peterson
Behavior Research for Humanity LLC.
3670 Red Maple Rd. (765e.)
Salt Lake City, UT 84106 208-650-1346 ph (or P.O. Box 802, SLC,UT 84101) jlp1997@msn.com
I am a public official under oath (or may become one) and must have an opinion about the use of money or promises to influence any public official in the discharge of his or her public or legal duties.
I agree that corporate political contributions are not lawful and violate state and federal bribery statutes because of "corporate mission laws" that protect share holders funds (from fraud/embezzlement); funds must be spent on profit, potential profit or humanitarian expenditures only. So intent cannot be freedom of speech but seeking influence for profit.
Name(print)________________________Sign__________________date_____
If you believe that corporate contributions are lawful: Sign down here instead:
Name(print)________________________Sign___________________date____
BRIBERY: The offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting of something of value for the purpose of influencing the action of an official in the discharge of his or her public or legal duties.....................unlawful by constitutional Equality Under All Laws.. (created Feb. 14, 2014)
2 of 246
===================================================
===================================================