Dear Gary Johnson,
This is the ethics of your dilemma; If you take money from a corporation later you should recuse yourself from any vote or promoting, etc. in favor or behalf of that corporation even if that law, contract, appointment would be good for the people.
If corporations knew this would happen THEY WOULD STAY OUT OF POLITICS. IT WOULD NOT PAY TO BE EXCLUDED BECAUSE OF BRIBERY RULES ON ETHICS OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS.
Got the picture this is the changes we must have to correct unlawful behaviors and practices that are destroying our nation.
So your PAC money needs to be ethical far beyond current regulations that allow freedom of speech to permit clear intent to commit bribery.
Do you see the logic of this""
This would mean you must return a lot of money.
IF THE VOTERS KNEW YOU DID THIS FOR THEM, WE WILL HELP YOU GET ELECTED BECAUSE YOU WOULD BE THE ONLY HONEST PERSON IN POLITICAL OFFICE AT THIS TIME.
Sincerely,  Jonathan L. Peterson    apparently the only person defending our constitutional voter rights right now.            
  ====================================

==============================

=============================

From: jlp1997@msn.com
To: boise.slc@ic.fbi.gov
Subject: some facebook posts that are a call for the rules to be followed, just like they have too.
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 08:00:26 +0000
=========

This fight for freedom only takes keystrokes.
God bless everyone of you citizen solders.
You follow the rules, why shouldn't those who risk your lives have to do the same?
I serve our nation like each of you. I have been under oath since 1973 but until now I have been a sheep and kept my mouth shut. No more, my voice is going to defend our constitution and the rules of conduct it demands of our elected officials. my brothers and sisters, many FBI agents know I am helping stop crimes. They are under the thumb of the DOJ so what ever the DOJ says is law. The DOJ is full of fear about what I am doing, to bad, they violate their own oath, until the voice of the people tell them to stop bribery if intent is provable, which it is, most easily with corporations.
If you wonder why veterans have to beg for help at times. You only need to understand how our status quo/ how things really works in society, and you will see we the people have been cheated and are sheep basically. You see bribery has been an art form for generations and has evolved to its current state.
Actually the DOJ could prosecute and convict every corporation and their recipient elected official that voted on a law, a contract, an appointment, etc. Because for bribery to be prosecuted you only need to prove intent.
""I would go anywhere in the USA to debate some experts in law and constitutional voter equality as the highest principle of a democracy.
And those status quo defenders looked very stupid, that is why this debate is blocked, test runs at U.of Utah I destroyed them. So guess what no class room or professor allowed debates, period.""
Corporations under corporate mission laws, (this is really easy to understand once explained clearly) have rules included to protect share holders money from fraud/embezzlement: What this means-- management can only spend share holders money on profit, potential profit or humanitarian expenditures. That is it. Or fraud could be justified. So the crap the Supreme Court said about freedom of speech would actually fall apart if a prosecution was to be perused by not only the DOJ but any county D.A. where an elected official operates, like a state capital building. That is right, we the people could put an end to bribery controlled government. At least corporations and then any wealthy person or group that gives money and then gets a law, or tax code break, or appointments for their lobbyists could go to jail. But no body want to honor their oath of office because of fear. Fear of the unknown that will happen if we change how things work abruptly.
That is really stupid but that is how human instinct works. No Trust of the unknown even if it is to correct some really bad behaviors.
We citizens are willing to take that chance. If we stop funding of elected officials with money for influence our government will not fail it will repair the bad laws and other unfair actions of our elected officials of the past.
DOES THAT SOUND GOOD TO YOU MY BROTHERS???
A constitutional debate over our broken rules of conduct would do the job for us. I happen to have the logic and skills to win that debate that no one wants to have, yet. Not at the Utah capital, U. of Utah or BYU or Yale, or Harvard, even Berkeley is a bunch of chickens. What happen to all the hippies. Those hippies were being drafted and many died so getting killed will make some people risk status quo operations. Which is actually good if it means debate over going to war in Vietnam and get 50,000 of our brothers some sisters killed because of congress who didn't want their own kids killed.
So much for a history lesson.
This is the survey for public officials under oath that can change the world for the better. We must insist that our officials sign it with their beliefs on the record. With or without ethics.
Here it is. change the names for each state to fit.
------the survey nobody wants to sign---------
Dear Governor Gary R. Herbert, Utah Senate, Utah House and Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes:
The question is simple and straight forward:
Is the act of giving or receiving gifts or promises with the intent to influence a public official unlawful?
Answer the 1 question survey and honor your oath of office. Please return survey to me?
If intent is provable beyond any reasonable doubt: then such practices must be prosecuted, bribery is a crime against our citizen membership.
 Gross misconduct and ethics violations are the least of the charges that should and must be fully investigated/prosecuted by those having authority over such inexcusable behaviors as to accepting or supporting bribery. Bribery is unlawful. The law of bribery is an act against citizen voter equality. Equality of voter powers is the cornerstone of our democracy under a constitution.
We have been silent, those of us who are under constitutional oath of office. Never again can we allow our rules of conduct to be openly violated without voicing our objection in the most vigorous ways at our disposal. We are citizens of the United States of America and by law, constitutional law, must defend each other's rights to the fullest extent available, within the laws we swore to uphold. Sincerely,
Jonathan L. Peterson
Behavior Research for Humanity LLC.
3670 Red Maple Rd. (765e.)
Salt Lake City, UT 84106 208-650-1346 ph (or P.O. Box 802, SLC,UT 84101) jlp1997@msn.com
I am a public official under oath(or may become one) and must have an opinion about the use of money or promises to influence any public official in the discharge of his or her public or legal duties.
I agree that corporate political contributions are not lawful and violate state and federal bribery statutes because of "corporate mission laws" that protect share holders funds (from fraud/embezzlement); funds must be spent on profit, potential profit or humanitarian expenditures only. So intent cannot be freedom of speech but seeking influence for profit.
Name(print)_____________________Sign____________________date_____
If you believe that corporate contributions are lawful: Sign down here instead:
Name(print)______________________Sign___________________date____
BRIBERY: The offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting of something of value for the purpose of influencing the action of an official in the discharge of his or her public or legal duties.....................unlawful by constitutional Equality Under All Laws.. (created Feb. 14, 2014)
-------
extra for those that got hurt..
PTSD...Guess what pot is a good treatment for some. The fed is now going to allow research to see if cannabis can help with PTS. Alcohol is not a good treatment for that disorder.
PRINT THIS AND TAKE IT TO A JAG OFFICER AND YOUR COMMANDER AND SEE IF THEY HONOR THEIR OATHS.