Download Zipped Introduced WordPerfect HB0440.ZIP
[Status][Bill Documents][Fiscal Note][Bills Directory]

H.B. 440

             1     

DRUG PRODUCT EQUIVALENT AMENDMENTS

             2     
2007 GENERAL SESSION

             3     
STATE OF UTAH

             4     
Chief Sponsor: Eric K. Hutchings

             5     
Senate Sponsor: ____________

             6     
             7      LONG TITLE
             8      General Description:
             9          This bill amends Pharmacy Practice Act provisions governing the substitution of a drug
             10      product equivalent for a drug specified in a prescription order.
             11      Highlighted Provisions:
             12          This bill:
             13          .    amends the Pharmacy Practice Act;
             14          .    expands general drug substitution provisions to apply to any type of substitution;
             15          .    deletes duplicative language restating the definition of "drug product equivalent," a
             16      term defined elsewhere in the Pharmacy Practice Act;
             17          .    except as specified, prohibits substitution of a drug product equivalent for a drug
             18      prescribed to treat or prevent seizures without the prescribing practitioner's
             19      authorization;
             20          .    deletes duplicative language permitting a pharmacist or pharmacy intern to
             21      substitute a drug product equivalent for another drug without the prescribing
             22      practitioner's authorization;
             23          .    makes clarifying changes; and
             24          .    makes technical corrections.
             25      Monies Appropriated in this Bill:
             26          None
             27      Other Special Clauses:


             28          None
             29      Utah Code Sections Affected:
             30      AMENDS:
             31          58-17b-605, as enacted by Chapter 280, Laws of Utah 2004
             32     
             33      Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
             34          Section 1. Section 58-17b-605 is amended to read:
             35           58-17b-605. Drug product equivalents.
             36          (1) A pharmacist or pharmacy intern dispensing a prescription order for a specific drug
             37      [by brand or proprietary name] may substitute another drug [product equivalent] for the
             38      prescribed drug only if:
             39          (a) the purchaser specifically requests or consents to the substitution [of a drug product
             40      equivalent];
             41          (b) the [substituted] substitute drug is a drug product equivalent [is] of the [same
             42      generic type and is designated the therapeutic equivalent in the approved drug products with
             43      therapeutic equivalence evaluations prepared by the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
             44      of the Federal Food and Drug Administration] prescribed drug;
             45          (c) the [substituted] drug product equivalent is permitted to move in interstate
             46      commerce;
             47          (d) the pharmacist or pharmacy intern counsels the patient on the use and the expected
             48      response to the [prescribed] dispensed drug, whether a substitute or not, and the substitution is
             49      not otherwise prohibited by this chapter;
             50          (e) the prescribing practitioner has not indicated that [an equivalent] a drug product [is]
             51      equivalent may not [to] be substituted for the drug, as provided in Subsection [(5)] (4); [and]
             52          (f) if the prescribed drug has been prescribed in this instance to treat or prevent
             53      seizures, the pharmacist or pharmacy intern obtains the authorization of the prescribing
             54      practitioner, unless:
             55          (i) the drug product equivalent will be paid for, either in whole or in part, by the
             56      Department of Health; and
             57          (ii) (A) the drug product equivalent is a generic drug; and
             58          (B) a Department of Health pharmacist has not overridden, pursuant to Subsection


             59      58-17b-606 (5), the generic mandate provision of Subsection 58-17b-606 (4) and determined
             60      that use of a nongeneric drug would result in a financial benefit to the state; or
             61          (iii) in accordance with Subsection 58-17b-606 (4), the prescribing practitioner has
             62      demonstrated to the Department of Health a medical necessity for dispensing the drug product
             63      equivalent; and
             64          [(f)] (g) the substitution is not otherwise prohibited by law.
             65          (2) (a) Each out-of-state mail service pharmacy dispensing a [substituted] drug product
             66      equivalent as a substitute for another drug into this state shall notify the patient of the
             67      substitution either by telephone or in writing.
             68          (b) Each out-of-state mail service pharmacy shall comply with the requirements of this
             69      chapter with respect to [drugs which may be] a drug product equivalent substituted for another
             70      drug, including labeling [and], record keeping[, when dispensing substituted drug products],
             71      and in accordance with Subsection (1)(f), prescribing practitioner authorization.
             72          [(3) Pharmacists or pharmacy interns may not substitute without the prescriber's
             73      authorization on trade name drug product prescriptions unless the product is currently
             74      categorized in the approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations prepared
             75      by the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research of the Federal Food and Drug Administration
             76      as a drug product considered to be therapeutically equivalent to another drug product.]
             77          [(4)] (3) A pharmacist or pharmacy intern who dispenses a prescription with a drug
             78      product equivalent under this section assumes no greater liability than would be incurred had
             79      the pharmacist or pharmacy intern dispensed the prescription with the drug product prescribed.
             80          [(5)] (4) (a) If, in the opinion of the prescribing practitioner, it is in the best interest of
             81      the patient that [an equivalent] a drug product equivalent not be substituted for another drug,
             82      the practitioner may indicate a prohibition on substitution either by writing "dispense as
             83      written" or may sign in the appropriate space where two lines have been preprinted on a
             84      prescription order and captioned "dispense as written" or "substitution permitted".
             85          (b) If the prescription is communicated orally by the prescribing practitioner to the
             86      pharmacist or pharmacy intern, the practitioner shall indicate the prohibition on substitution
             87      and that indication shall be noted in writing by the pharmacist or pharmacy intern with the
             88      name of the practitioner and the words "orally by" and the initials of the pharmacist or
             89      pharmacy [practitioner] intern written after it.


             90          [(6)] (5) The substitution, if any, shall be communicated to the purchaser. The
             91      container shall be labeled with the name of the drug product equivalent dispensed and the
             92      pharmacist, pharmacy intern, or pharmacy technician shall indicate on the file copy of the
             93      prescription both the name of the prescribed drug and the name of the drug product equivalent
             94      dispensed in its place.
             95          [(7)] (6) Failure of a licensed medical practitioner to specify that no substitution is
             96      authorized does not constitute evidence of negligence.




Legislative Review Note
    as of 2-6-07 10:46 AM


Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel


[Bill Documents][Bills Directory]