(4)(a) Subsection (1)(d) does not apply to a person who is the victim of any
incident or threatened incident of domestic violence, dating violence, or stalking.
(b) An incident or threatened incident of domestic violence, dating violence, or
stalking does not constitute cause for the termination of any lease, tenancy, or right
to occupancy of the victim.
2. Page
7, Line 205 through Page 8, Line 216
:
205
(g)
(i)
"An act that would be considered criminal under the laws of this state"
under
206
Subsection (3)(a) includes only the following:
207
{
(i)
}
(A)
an act that would be considered a felony under the laws of this
state;
208
{
(ii)
}
(B)
an act that would be considered criminal affecting the health or
safety of a tenant,
209
the landlord, the landlord's agent, or other person on the landlord's property;
210
{
(iii)
}
(C)
an act that would be considered criminal that causes damage or
loss to any tenant's
211
property or the landlord's property;
212
{
(iv)
}
(D)
a drug- or gang-related act that would be considered criminal;
213
{
(v)
}
(E)
an act or threat of violence against any tenant or other person on
the premises, or
214
against the landlord or the landlord's agent; and
215
{
(vi)
}
(F)
any other act that would be considered criminal that the court
determines directly
216
impacts the peaceful enjoyment of the premises by any tenant
{
.
}
; and
(ii) "An act that would be considered criminal under the laws of this state" does
not include an act directly related to abuse engaged in by a person if the tenant, or
the tenant's immediate family member, is the victim of an act or threatened act of
domestic violence, dating violence, or stalking.
SUBSTITUTE
MOTION: Rep. Froerer moved to pass the bill out favorably. The motion passed, with Rep.
Biksupski, Rep. S. Clark, Rep. Duckworth, and Rep. Hansen voting in opposition.
Rep. D. Clark and Rep. Ferry were absent for the vote.
S.B. 118 Mechanics' Lien and Payment Amendments (Sen. S. Jenkins)
Sen. Jenkins introduced the bill to the committee with the assistance of Craig Moody, Utah
Construction Suppliers Association.
Spoke to the bill: Charles Evans, Utah Land Title Association
Rep. S. Clark and Rep. Morley declared a conflict of interest.
MOTION: Rep. Froerer moved to amend the bill as follows:
Page 6, Line 155 after shall insert clearly
after payment insert . and delete [by]
Page 6, delete lines 156 and 157
SUBSTITUTE
MOTION: Rep. Kiser moved to pass the bill out favorably. The motion passed unanimously,
with Rep. D. Clark, Rep. Dunnigan, and Rep. Ferry absent for the vote.
H.B. 127 Employee Verification, Procurement, and Incentives (Rep. S. Sandstrom)
Rep. Sandstrom introduced the bill to the committee.
MOTION: Rep. Morley moved to amend the bill as follows:
1. Page
3, Lines 72 through 75
:
72
(b) If an employer described in this Subsection (3) receives or claims an economic
73
development incentive, the employer shall notify the office of a finding described in
Subsection
74
(3)(a) within
{
five
}
eight
business days of the day on which the finding
described in Subsection (3)(a)
75
is final.
2. Page
4, Lines 92 through 109
House Committee Amendments
2-8-2007
:
92
(2)
(a)
A state
public
procurement unit shall require as a condition of any
agreement to procure
93
supplies, services, and construction
{
that is the subject of a request for
proposals
}
described in Subsection (2)(b)
that an
94
employer submit with that employer's response to a bid
related to that agreement
a
certification that the employer:
95
{
(a)
}
(i)
participates in the federal employment verification program; and
96
{
(b)
}
(ii)
has not been found to violate the requirements of the federal
employment
97
verification program by:
98
{
(i)
}
(A)
the United States Department of Homeland Security; or
99
{
(ii)
}
(B)
the
{
division
}
Division of Purchasing and General
Services
.
(b) This section applies to an agreement to procure supplies, services, or
construction that:
(i) is the subject of a request for proposals; and
(ii) has a total dollar value equal to or greater than $25,000.
(c) (i) This section does not apply to a person that does not directly
submit a response to a bid described in Subsection (2)(a) for the right to enter
into an agreement with the state public procurement unit, including a person
who is a subcontractor of the employer that submits a response to the bid.
(ii) An employer who submits a response to a bid in accordance with
Subsection (2)(a) may not be required under this section to certify whether or
not any subcontractor of that employer participates in the federal
employment verification program.
100
(3) (a) If the
{
division
}
Division of Purchasing and General Services
learns that the employer does not participate in the federal
101
employment verification program or an employer is found by the United States
Department of
102
Homeland Security to violate the requirements of the federal employment verification
program
{
,
}
:
(i) the employer shall remedy the violation within 60 days of the earlier of:
(A) the day on which the
{
division
}
Division of Purchasing and General
Services notifies the employer that the
{
division
}
Division of Purchasing and
General Services learned that the employer is subject to this Subsection (3); or
(B) the day on which the employer notifies the
{
division
}
Division of
Purchasing and General Services of the finding as required by Subsection (3)(b);
and
(ii) if the employer fails to remedy the violation within the 60-day period
described in Subsection (3)(a)(i):
(A) for an agreement entered into on or after April 30, 2007, any agreement
with a state public procurement unit that is in effect terminates on the day
immediately following the day on which the 60-day period ends;
(B) the state public procurement unit has any remedy available under an
agreement described in Subsection (3)(a)(ii)(A) for breach of that agreement; and
103
(C)
the employer may not enter into a new agreement or renew an agreement to
provide supplies,
104
services, or construction to a state
public
procurement unit for one year after the day
on which the
105
finding described in
{
this
}
Subsection (3)
(a)(i)
becomes final.
106
(b) If an employer described in this Subsection (3) has an agreement to provide
107
supplies, services, or contraction to a state
public
procurement unit, the employer
shall notify the
108
{
division
}
Division of Purchasing and General Services
of the finding
described in Subsection (3)(a) within
{
five
}
eight
business days of the day on
109
which the finding described in Subsection (3)(a) is final.
The motion to amend passed unanimously, with Rep. Dunnigan, Rep. D. Clark, Rep. Ferry, Rep.
Froerer, and Rep. Walker absent for the vote.
Spoke for the bill: Gayle Ruzicka, Utah Eagle Forum
Ron Mortenson, private citizen
The Chair noted that a quorum was no longer present.
Chair S. Clark adjourned the meeting at 6:13 p.m.
H.B. 464 Limited Liability Company Amendments (Rep. P. Neuenschwander)
This bill was not heard.
H.B. 183 Employee Noncompetition Contracts (Rep. L. Fowlke)
This bill was not heard.
_________________________
Rep. Stephen D. Clark, Chair