H.B.
221
AGRICULTURE AND INDUSTRIAL PROTECTION AREA AMENDMENTS
senate floor
Amendments
Amendment 4 March 4, 2008 8:49 am
Senator Margaret Dayton
proposes the following amendments:
1. Page
1, Lines 20 through 22
House Committee Amendments
2-14-2008
:
20
.
{
prohibits
}
requires
state agencies and political subdivisions
{
from
}
to
consider impacts on agriculture protection areas and reasonably comparable alternatives
when
designating a transportation
21
corridor H.
{
as a final, preferred alternative .H over land in an agriculture protection area
21a
unless there is no other
22
reasonably comparable alternative
}
and to make reasonable efforts to minimize or eliminate
detrimental impacts on agriculture
.
2. Page
10, Lines 282 through 285
House Committee Amendments
2-14-2008
:
282
(3)
{
A
}
Each
state agency
{
or
}
and
political subdivision
{
may not designate or
propose
}
of the state that designates or proposes to designate
a
283
transportation corridor H.
{
as a final, preferred alternative
}
.H
{
on land within an agriculture
283a
protection area unless there is no
}
shall:
(a) consider:
(i) whether the transportation corridor would:
(A) be located on land that is included within an agriculture protection area; or
(B) interfere with agriculture production activities on land within an agriculture protection area;
and
(ii) each
other
284
reasonably comparable alternative to the placement of the corridor on
{
the
}
land within
{
the
}
an
285
agriculture protection area
{
.
}
; and
(b) make reasonable efforts to minimize or eliminate any detrimental impact on agriculture that
may result from the designation of a transportation corridor.
Page 1 of 1
hb0221.sfa.04.wpd
LRGC
Rrees
Rrees