S.B. 208
         TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR PRESERVATION AMENDMENTS

senate floor Amendments

Amendment 1 February 25, 2008 11:06 am



Senator Sheldon L Killpack proposes the following amendments:

1.    Page 2, Lines 44 through 45 :    

             44      circumstances;
{   and   }       

    .     on July 1, 2012, sunsets the authority of the:
        .     Transportation Commission to designate a transportation corridor or a portion of a transportation corridor as a critical transportation corridor; and
        .     Department of Transportation to use eminent domain powers for the acquisition of private property rights within a critical transportation corridor; and  

             45          .    makes technical changes.

2.    Page 2, Lines 53 through 54 :    

             53          17-27a-508, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2007, Chapter 363
      63-55-272, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2004, Chapter 90      

             54          72-5-402, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2003, Chapter 300

3.    Page 4, Lines 98 through 99 :    

             98      complied with the requirements of Subsection (1)(b).
    
  (d) After a municipality has complied with the requirements of Subsection (1)(b) for a land use application, the municipality may not withhold approval of the land use application for which the applicant is otherwise entitled under Subsection (1)(a).      

             99          [(b)]
{   (d)   }        (e)       The municipality shall process an application without regard to proceedings


4.    Page 4, Line 104 :    

             104          [(c)]
{   (e)   }        (f)       An application for a land use approval is considered submitted and complete


5.    Page 4, Line 107 :    

             107          [(d)]
{   (f)   }        (g)       The continuing validity of an approval of a land use application is conditioned


6.    Page 4, Line 110 :    

             110          [(e)]
{   (g)   }        (h)       A municipality may not impose on a holder of an issued land use permit a


7.    Page 4, Line 114 :    



             114          [(f)]
{   (h)   }        (i)       A municipality may not withhold issuance of a certificate of occupancy


8.    Page 6, Lines 160 through 161 :    

             160      complied with the requirements of Subsection (1)(b).
    
  (d) After a county has complied with the requirements of Subsection (1)(b) for a land use application, the county may not withhold approval of the land use application for which the applicant is otherwise entitled under Subsection (1)(a).      

             161          [(b)]
{   (d)   }        (e)       The county shall process an application without regard to proceedings initiated


9.    Page 6, Line 166 :    

             166          [(c)]
{   (e)   }        (f)       An application for a land use approval is considered submitted and complete


10.    Page 6, Line 169 :    

             169          [(d)]
{   (f)   }        (g)       The continuing validity of an approval of a land use application is conditioned


11.    Page 6, Line 172 :    

             172          [(e)]
{   (g)   }        (h)       A county may not impose on a holder of an issued land use permit a


12.    Page 6, Line 176 :    

             176          [(f)]
{   (h)   }        (i)       A county may not withhold issuance of a certificate of occupancy because of


13.    Page 6, Line 181 :    

             181      shall comply with mandatory provisions of those ordinances.
      Section 3. Section 63-55-272 is amended to read:      

     63-55-272 .   Repeal dates, Title 72.
      Subsection 72-5-403(4) regarding the designation of critical transportation corridors and the use of eminent domain for acquisition of private property rights within a critical transportation corridor is repealed July 1, 2012.      


Renumber remaining sections accordingly.


Page 1 of 2
sb0208.sfa.01.wpd LRGC Poconnor shalverson