Download Zipped Introduced WordPerfect SJR016S01.ZIP
[Status][Bill Documents][Fiscal Note][Bills Directory]
First Substitute S.J.R. 16
Senator David P. Hinkins proposes the following substitute bill:
1
JOINT RESOLUTION SUPPORTING NUCLEAR
2
POWER
3
2009 GENERAL SESSION
4
STATE OF UTAH
5
Chief Sponsor: David P. Hinkins
6
House Sponsor:
Christine F. Watkins
7
8
LONG TITLE
9
General Description:
10
This joint resolution of the Legislature expresses support for new nuclear power
11
development in Utah.
12
Highlighted Provisions:
13
This resolution:
14
. encourages that new nuclear power development be pursued in Utah due to its
15
beneficial impact on the economy, fuel diversification, and the environment, and its
16
impressive operational safety and security record;
17
. declares that nuclear power has been shown to be a viable cost effective option, that
18
current rate payer protection laws and regulations are sufficient, and that no new
19
legislation or special action is needed for the Public Service Commission to
20
recognize nuclear power as a prudent investment;
21
. declares that no appropriations for special committees or programs are needed to
22
determine whether nuclear power can be built in Utah;
23
. encourages all investor-owned and municipally owned utilities and power marketers
24
and traders to consider participating in a nuclear power project in Utah; and
25
. recognizes commercial nuclear power plants as a market-based, commercially
26
competitive enterprise.
27
Special Clauses:
28
None
29
30
Be it resolved by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
31
WHEREAS, Utah and the surrounding western states have experienced increased new
32
electricity demands and have forecasted continued increases over the next several decades;
33
WHEREAS, Utah requires affordable and abundant energy for homes and businesses to
34
maintain and grow its economy;
35
WHEREAS, Utah and the surrounding areas will likely suffer significant financial
36
difficulties without new reliable and affordable electric generating resources being built, adding
37
to and prolonging the depressed economy;
38
WHEREAS, Utah enjoys and continues to rely on cost effective coal fired power plants
39
for 85% of its electric generation;
40
WHEREAS, Utah's ability to build any new significant coal fired power plants is
41
limited;
42
WHEREAS, new emission controls, carbon capture technology, carbon sequestration,
43
and advance coal combustion technologies should be encouraged, but are not projected to be
44
commercially feasible and cost effective for at least 25 years;
45
WHEREAS, new natural gas electric generation could increase the volatility of retail
46
electric prices and retail natural gas prices;
47
WHEREAS, hydro power resources are constrained and not expected to expand in
48
capacity;
49
WHEREAS, nationwide nuclear power provides low cost, long term, stable retail and
50
wholesale pricing for customers;
51
WHEREAS, the United States Congress and the United States Nuclear Regulatory
52
Commission worked together to improve the old process for licensing new nuclear power
53
plants;
54
WHEREAS, the new nuclear power plant licensing process presently includes a "one
55
step" Combined Operating License (COL) procedure, which combines construction and
56
operating license applications and reviews into a single process;
57
WHEREAS, the new licensing process is more efficient, predictable, and reliable;
58
WHEREAS, three Early Site Permits for new nuclear plants, one of the new licensing
59
processes now in place, have been issued with little or no delays from adjudication;
60
WHEREAS, the estimated time frame to complete a new nuclear COL is five years;
61
WHEREAS, the development of nuclear power plants will provide significant
62
economic benefits to the local, regional, and state populations in the form of many high paying
63
jobs and additional tax revenues;
64
WHEREAS, the construction of a new nuclear facility would inject billion of dollars
65
into Utah's economy in the form of 3,500 construction jobs during a two unit construction
66
period spanning up to seven years;
67
WHEREAS, one proposed site in Utah would contribute over $2 million in 2009 to the
68
State Institutional Trust Lands Fund;
69
WHEREAS, operations of two new generation units would provide approximately 800
70
jobs for highly skilled workers over the plant's 60 year projected lifetime;
71
WHEREAS, the needed regulatory and legal framework to deploy safe, secure, and cost
72
competitive nuclear power in Utah is in place;
73
WHEREAS, Utah already has a nuclear reactor at the University of Utah;
74
WHEREAS, the University of Utah Training Research and Isotope Production, General
75
Atomics research reactor in Salt Lake City has been operating safely since 1975;
76
WHEREAS, the United States' nuclear industry has accumulated almost 3,400 reactor
77
years of operation since the first plant started up in 1957 without serious injury or death to a
78
single member of the public;
79
WHEREAS, the current practice of storing spent fuel in wet or dry storage containers at
80
a nuclear power plant has been proven safe since commercial nuclear power began in 1957;
81
WHEREAS, 95% of the energy from a nuclear reactor's spent fuel has significant value
82
and can be reprocessed or recycled for use as fuel in the future when this option is
83
commercialized in the United States;
84
WHEREAS, spent fuel from a nuclear reactor is valuable;
85
WHEREAS, France, Japan, Russia, the United Kingdom, and Germany currently
86
recycle or reprocess spent fuel successfully; and
87
WHEREAS, there is no scientific or safety rationale requiring the near term movement
88
of spent fuel from the power plants where it is generated, and fuel can be safely and securely
89
stored on site for up to 100 years without environmental impacts:
90
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Legislature of the state of Utah
91
urges that new nuclear power development be pursued within the boundaries of the state.
92
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Legislature urges that commercial development
93
of new nuclear power be pursued in the state due to its beneficial impact on the economy, fuel
94
diversification, and the environment, and its impressive operational safety and security record,
95
in particular the fact that no member of the public has been seriously injured by operation of
96
the 104 nuclear power plants currently operating in the United States.
97
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Legislature declares that nuclear power has
98
been shown to be a viable cost effective option, that current rate payer protection laws and
99
regulations are sufficient, and that no new legislation or special action is needed for the Public
100
Service Commission to recognize nuclear power as a prudent investment.
101
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Legislature recognizes that no appropriations
102
are needed for special committees or programs to determine whether a nuclear power plant can
103
be built in Utah because the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission will review and
104
adjudicate the licensing, as needed, and nuclear developers will pay for those costs.
105
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Legislature encourages investor-owned and
106
municipally owned utilities and power marketers and traders to consider participating in a
107
nuclear power project in Utah.
108
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Legislature recognizes commercial nuclear
109
power plants as market-based, commercially competitive enterprises due to their safety and
110
security record, the science and performance data, and the economic performance of the present
111
power plants.
112
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be sent to the President of
113
the United States, the Majority Leader of the United States Senate, the Speaker of the United
114
States House of Representatives, the United States Secretary of Energy, Governor Huntsman,
115
and to the members of Utah's congressional delegation.
[Bill Documents][Bills Directory]