Download Zipped Introduced WordPerfect HB0135.ZIP
[Status][Bill Documents][Fiscal Note][Bills Directory]

H.B. 135

             1     

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE AMENDMENTS

             2     
2013 GENERAL SESSION

             3     
STATE OF UTAH

             4     
Chief Sponsor: Dean Sanpei

             5     
Senate Sponsor: ____________

             6     
             7      LONG TITLE
             8      General Description:
             9          This bill amends medical malpractice action or arbitration proceedings.
             10      Highlighted Provisions:
             11          This bill:
             12          .    provides that a certificate of compliance must be issued for a health care provider or
             13      health care entity to allocate fault in a pre-litigation medical malpractice or
             14      arbitration hearing; and
             15          .    requires that evidence from a medical review panel remain unreportable to a health
             16      care facility or health insurance plan.
             17      Money Appropriated in this Bill:
             18          None
             19      Other Special Clauses:
             20          None
             21      Utah Code Sections Affected:
             22      AMENDS:
             23          78B-3-418, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2010, Chapter 97
             24          78B-3-419, as renumbered and amended by Laws of Utah 2008, Chapter 3
             25     
             26      Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
             27          Section 1. Section 78B-3-418 is amended to read:


             28           78B-3-418. Decision and recommendations of panel -- No judicial or other review.
             29          (1) (a) The panel shall issue an opinion and the division shall issue a certificate of
             30      compliance with the pre-litigation hearing requirements of this part in accordance with this
             31      section.
             32          (b) A certificate of compliance issued in accordance with this section is proof that the
             33      claimant has complied with all conditions precedent under this part prior to the commencement
             34      of litigation as required in Subsection 78B-3-412 (1).
             35          (c) (i) A party in a medical malpractice action or arbitration hearing may not attempt to
             36      allocate fault to any health care provider or health care entity unless a certificate of compliance
             37      has been issued in accordance with this section for that specific, individual health care
             38      provider. A health care provider, or health care provider exempted from the requirement of a
             39      pre-litigation hearing by statute or an arbitration agreement, may nevertheless be joined in a
             40      pre-litigation hearing to satisfy the requirements of this section. Participation in a pre-litigation
             41      hearing may not waive any right to enforce an arbitration agreement.
             42          (ii) The party making the claim against, or seeking to allocate fault to, a health care
             43      provider or health care entity is required to seek and obtain the certificate of compliance
             44      required by this section.
             45          (2) (a) The panel shall render its opinion in writing not later than 30 days after the end
             46      of the proceedings, and determine on the basis of the evidence whether:
             47          (i) each claim against each health care provider has merit or has no merit; and
             48          (ii) if a claim is meritorious, whether the conduct complained of resulted in harm to the
             49      claimant.
             50          (b) There is no judicial or other review or appeal of the panel's decision or
             51      recommendations.
             52          (3) The division shall issue a certificate of compliance to the claimant, for each
             53      respondent named in the intent to file a claim under this part, if:
             54          (a) for a named respondent, the panel issues an opinion of merit under Subsections
             55      (2)(a)(i) and (ii);
             56          (b) for a named respondent, the claimant files an affidavit of merit in accordance with
             57      Section 78B-3-423 if the opinion under Subsection (1)(a) is non-meritorious under either
             58      Subsection (2)(a)(i) or (ii);


             59          (c) the claimant has complied with the provisions of Subsections 78B-3-416 (3)(c) and
             60      (d); or
             61          (d) the parties submitted a stipulation under Subsection 78B-3-416 (3)(d).
             62          Section 2. Section 78B-3-419 is amended to read:
             63           78B-3-419. Evidence of proceedings not admissible in subsequent action --
             64      Panelist may not be compelled to testify -- Immunity of panelist from civil liability --
             65      Information regarding professional conduct.
             66          (1) Evidence of the proceedings conducted by the medical review panel and its results,
             67      opinions, findings, and determinations are not admissible as evidence in [an action] any civil
             68      action or arbitration proceeding subsequently brought by the claimant [in a court of competent
             69      jurisdiction] against any respondent and are not reportable to any health care facility or health
             70      care insurance plan as a part of any credentialing process.
             71          (2) No panelist may be compelled to testify in a civil action subsequently filed with
             72      regard to the subject matter of the panel's review. A panelist has immunity from civil liability
             73      arising from participation as a panelist and for all communications, findings, opinions, and
             74      conclusions made in the course and scope of duties prescribed by this section.
             75          (3) Nothing in this chapter may be interpreted to prohibit the division from considering
             76      any information contained in a statutory notice of intent to commence action, request for
             77      prelitigation panel review, or written findings of a panel with respect to the division's
             78      determining whether a licensee engaged in unprofessional or unlawful conduct.




Legislative Review Note
    as of 2-11-13 4:43 PM


Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel


[Bill Documents][Bills Directory]