1st Sub.
H.B.
84
SCHOOL DISTRICT AMENDMENTS
House Floor
Amendments
Amendment 2 February 27, 2014 11:07 AM
Representative Rich Cunningham
proposes the following amendments:
1. Page
1, Lines 11 through 16
:
11
This bill:
12
. provides that
{
a qualifying city or interlocal agreement participant
}
an interlocal
agreement participant or a certain qualifying city
may not submit
13
for voter approval a measure to create a new school district if the results of a
14
feasibility study show that the five-year projected average annual revenue of the
15
proposed new school district exceeds the five-year projected average annual cost of
16
the proposed new school district by more than 5%;
2. Page
7, Lines 195 through 198
:
195
(c) A qualifying city
incorporated after May 13, 2014,
may not submit for voter approval a
measure to create a new
196
school district if the results of a feasibility study described in Subsection (2)(b) show that the
197
five-year projected average annual revenue calculated under Subsection (4)(a) exceeds the
198
five-year projected average annual cost under Subsection (4)(b) by more than 5%.
3. Page
11, Lines 323 through 326
a.House Committee Amendments
b.2-14-2014
:
323
(c)
{
assumes a
}
considers the
level and quality of school district services to be provided to
the
324
proposed new school district in the future
{
that fairly and reasonably approximates
}
and
the level
and
325
quality of school district services being provided to the existing school district at the time of
326
the feasibility study; and
Page 1 of 1
LRGC
tracynuttall
tracynuttall
F 02/27/14 10:57a