From: Stratfor
To: Ric Cantrell,
Subject: Russia Examines Its Options for Responding to Ukraine
Date: Tue Mar 18 09:18:20 MDT 2014
Email not displaying correctly?
View it in your browser.
Geopolitical Weekly Share - Free Report
Get this from a friend? Join to receive our free geopolitical intelligence reports directly from us!
Join to get free reports
Russia Examines Its Options for Responding to Ukraine

By George Friedman

The fall of the Ukrainian government and its replacement with one that appears to be oriented toward the West represents a major defeat for the Russian Federation. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia accepted the reality that the former Eastern European satellite states would be absorbed into the Western economic and political systems. Moscow claims to have been assured that former Soviet republics would be left as a neutral buffer zone and not absorbed. Washington and others have disputed that this was promised. In any case, it was rendered meaningless when the Baltic States were admitted to NATO and the European Union. The result was that NATO, which had been almost 1,000 miles from St. Petersburg, was now less than approximately 100 miles away.

This left Belarus and Ukraine as buffers. Ukraine is about 300 miles from Moscow at its closest point. Were Belarus and Ukraine both admitted to NATO, the city of Smolensk, which had been deep inside the Soviet Union, would have become a border town. Russia has historically protected itself with its depth. It moved its borders as far west as possible, and that depth deterred adventurers -- or, as it did with Hitler and Napoleon, destroyed them. The loss of Ukraine as a buffer to the West leaves Russia without that depth and hostage to the intentions and capabilities of Europe and the United States. Read more »

Subscribe to get total access to all of our content
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn


221 W 6th St
STE 400
Austin, Tx 78701

Add us to your address book