2
3
4
5
6
7 LONG TITLE
8 Committee Note:
9 The Business and Labor Interim Committee recommended this bill.
10 General Description:
11 This bill modifies the Utah Occupational Safety and Health Act to address discharge of
12 or retaliation against an employee.
13 Highlighted Provisions:
14 This bill:
15 ▸ prohibits discharge of or retaliation against an employee under certain
16 circumstances;
17 ▸ addresses the procedures to be followed if there is a claim of prohibited discharge or
18 retaliation, including an investigative and appellate process; and
19 ▸ makes technical changes.
20 Money Appropriated in this Bill:
21 None
22 Other Special Clauses:
23 None
24 Utah Code Sections Affected:
25 AMENDS:
26 34A-6-203, as renumbered and amended by Laws of Utah 1997, Chapter 375
27
28 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
29 Section 1. Section 34A-6-203 is amended to read:
30 34A-6-203. Discharge or retaliation against employee prohibited.
31 (1) A person may not discharge or in any [
32 [
33 (a) [
34 causes to be instituted [
35 (b) [
36 or related to this chapter; or
37 (c) [
38 of the employee or others.
39 (2) (a) [
40 otherwise [
41 within 30 days after the violation occurs, file a complaint with the division [
42
43 (b) (i) Upon receipt of the complaint, the division shall cause an investigation to be
44 made.
45 (ii) The division may employ investigators as necessary to carry out the purpose of this
46 Subsection (2).
47 [
48
49
50 [
51
52 [
53 [
54
55 [
56
57 (c) Upon completion of the investigation, the division shall issue an order:
58 (i) (A) finding a violation of this section has occurred;
59 (B) requiring that the violation cease; and
60 (C) which may include other appropriate relief, such as reinstatement of the employee
61 to the employee's former position with back pay; or
62 (ii) finding that a violation of the section has not occurred.
63 (d) An order issued under Subsection (2)(c) is the final order of the commission unless
64 a party to the claim of a violation of this section seeks further review as provided in Subsection
65 (3).
66 (3) (a) A party to a claim of a violation of this section may seek review of the order
67 issued under Subsection (2)(c) within 30 days from the date the order is issued by filing a
68 request for review with the Division of Adjudication.
69 (b) The request for review shall comply with Subsection 63G-4-301(1).
70 (c) If the request for review is made, the Division of Adjudication shall conduct a de
71 novo review of the underlying order.
72 (d) If the request for review is based on a finding that a violation of this section
73 occurred, the division shall appear in the review proceeding to defend the division's finding.
74 (e) If the request for review is based on a finding that a violation of this section did not
75 occur, the division may not participate in the review proceeding.
76 (f) (i) If the Division of Adjudication determines a violation of this section has
77 occurred, it may order relief as provided in Subsection (2)(c).
78 (ii) If the Division of Adjudication determines that a violation of this section has not
79 occurred, it shall issue an order stating the determination.
80 (4) A party may appeal an order issued by the Division of Adjudication under
81 Subsection (3)(f) in accordance with Subsection 34A-6-304(1).
Legislative Review Note
Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel