This document includes House Committee Amendments incorporated into the bill on Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:56 PM by jeyring.
This document includes House Floor Amendments incorporated into the bill on Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 12:06 PM by ryoung.
1     
CUSTODY AMENDMENTS RELATED TO PARENTS WITH

2     
DISABILITIES

3     
2017 GENERAL SESSION

4     
STATE OF UTAH

5     
Chief Sponsor: Patrice M. Arent

6     
Senate Sponsor: Todd Weiler

7     

8     LONG TITLE
9     General Description:
10          This bill modifies provisions related to custody of children in a divorce.
11     Highlighted Provisions:
12          This bill:
13          ▸     addresses a court taking into consideration the disability of a parent in determining
14     custody; and
15          ▸     makes technical changes, including modifying references to husband and wife and
16     mother or father.
17     Money Appropriated in this Bill:
18          None
19     Other Special Clauses:
20          None
21     Utah Code Sections Affected:
22     AMENDS:
23          30-3-10, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2014, Chapter 409
24     

25     Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
26          Section 1. Section 30-3-10 is amended to read:
27          30-3-10. Custody of children in case of separation or divorce -- Custody
28     consideration.
29          (1) If a [husband and wife having] married couple having one or more minor children
30     are separated, or their marriage is declared void or dissolved, the court shall make an order for
31     the future care and custody of the minor children as it considers appropriate.
32          (a) In determining any form of custody, including a change in custody, the court shall
33     consider the best interests of the child without preference for either [the mother or father]
34     parent solely because of the biological sex of the parent and, among other factors the court
35     finds relevant, the following:
36          (i) the past conduct and demonstrated moral standards of each of the parties;
37          (ii) which parent is most likely to act in the best interest of the child, including
38     allowing the child frequent and continuing contact with the noncustodial parent;
39          (iii) the extent of bonding between the parent and child, meaning the depth, quality,
40     and nature of the relationship between a parent and child;
41          (iv) whether the parent has intentionally exposed the child to pornography or material
42     harmful to a minor, as defined in Section 76-10-1201; and
43          (v) those factors outlined in Section 30-3-10.2.
44          (b) There [shall be] is a rebuttable presumption that joint legal custody, as defined in
45     Section 30-3-10.1, is in the best interest of the child, except in cases where there is:
46          (i) domestic violence in the home or in the presence of the child;
47          (ii) special physical or mental needs of a parent or child, making joint legal custody
48     unreasonable;
49          (iii) physical distance between the residences of the parents, making joint decision
50     making impractical in certain circumstances; or
51          (iv) any other factor the court considers relevant including those listed in this section
52     and Section 30-3-10.2.
53          (c) The person who desires joint legal custody shall file a proposed parenting plan in
54     accordance with Sections 30-3-10.8 and 30-3-10.9. A presumption for joint legal custody may
55     be rebutted by a showing by a preponderance of the evidence that it is not in the best interest of
56     the child.
57          (d) [The children] A child may not be required by either party to testify unless the trier
58     of fact determines that extenuating circumstances exist that would necessitate the testimony of
59     the [children] child be heard and there is no other reasonable method to present [their] the
60     child's testimony.
61          (e) The court may inquire of [the children] a child and take into consideration the
62     [children's] child's desires regarding future custody or parent-time schedules, but the expressed
63     desires are not controlling and the court may determine the [children's] child's custody or
64     parent-time otherwise. The desires of a child 14 years of age or older shall be given added
65     weight, but is not the single controlling factor.
66          (f) [If interviews with the children are] If an interview with a child is conducted by the
67     court pursuant to Subsection (1)(e), [they] the interview shall be conducted by the judge in
68     camera. The prior consent of the parties may be obtained but is not necessary if the court finds
69     that an interview with [the children] a child is the only method to ascertain the child's desires
70     regarding custody.
71          (2) In awarding custody, the court shall consider, among other factors the court finds
72     relevant, which parent is most likely to act in the best interests of the child, including allowing
73     the child frequent and continuing contact with the noncustodial parent as the court finds
74     appropriate.
75          (3) If the court finds that one parent does not desire custody of the child, the court shall
76     take that evidence into consideration in determining whether to award custody to the other
77     parent.
78          (4) (a) Except as provided in Subsection (4)(b), a court may not discriminate against a
79     parent due to a disability, as defined in Section 57-21-2, in awarding custody or determining
80     whether a substantial change has occurred for the purpose of modifying an award of custody.
81          [(b) If a court takes a parent's disability into account in awarding custody or
82     determining whether a substantial change has occurred for the purpose of modifying an award
83     of custody, the parent with a disability may rebut any evidence, presumption, or inference
84     arising from the disability by showing that:]
85          (b) The court may not consider the disability of a parent as a factor in awarding
86     custody Ĥ→ or modifying an award of custody based on a determination of a substantial
86a     change in circumstances ←Ĥ , unless the court makes specific findings that:
87          (i) the disability [does not] significantly or substantially [inhibit] inhibits the parent's
88     ability to provide for the physical and emotional needs of the child at issue; [or] and
89          (ii) the parent with a disability [has] lacks sufficient human, monetary, or other
90     resources available to supplement the parent's ability to provide for the physical and emotional
91     needs of the child at issue.
92          (c) Nothing in this section may be construed to apply to adoption proceedings under
93     Title 78B, Chapter 6, Part 1, Utah Adoption Act.
94          (5) This section establishes neither a preference nor a presumption for or against joint
95     physical custody or sole physical custody, but allows the court and the family the widest
96     discretion to choose a parenting plan that is in the best interest of the child.




Legislative Review Note
Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel