1
2
3
4
5
6
7 LONG TITLE
8 General Description:
9 This bill amends provisions of the Utah Criminal Code relating to forgery and identity
10 fraud.
11 Highlighted Provisions:
12 This bill:
13 ▸ defines terms;
14 ▸ modifies the elements of a financial transaction card offense;
15 ▸ increases the penalty for unlawful possession of the financial transaction card
16 information of a certain number of individuals ;
17 ▸ increases the penalty for unlawful possession of the identifying documents of a
18 certain number of individuals ; and
19 ▸ makes technical changes.
20 Money Appropriated in this Bill:
21 None
22 Other Special Clauses:
23 None
24 Utah Code Sections Affected:
25 AMENDS:
26 76-6-502, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2001, Chapter 56
27 76-6-506.3, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2009, Chapter 166
28 76-6-1105, as enacted by Laws of Utah 2004, Chapter 227
29 78B-9-104, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2017, Chapter 447
30
31 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
32 Section 1. Section 76-6-502 is amended to read:
33 76-6-502. Possession of forged writing or device for writing -- Penalty.
34 (1) As used in this section, "device" means any equipment, mechanism, material or
35 program.
36 (2) [
37
38 Section 76-6-501, or who with intent to defraud knowingly possesses [
39 [
40 Section 76-6-501, is guilty of a third degree felony.
41 Section 2. Section 76-6-506.3 is amended to read:
42 76-6-506.3. Financial transaction card offenses -- Unlawful acquisition,
43 possession, or transfer of card.
44 [
45 (2), an individual is guilty of a third degree felony who:
46 [
47 card holder or the issuer;
48 [
49 transaction card in violation of Section 76-6-506.2;
50 [
51 knowledge that [
52 76-6-506.2;
53 [
54 was lost, mislaid, stolen, or delivered under a mistake as to the identity or address of the card
55 holder; and
56 [
57 in violation of Section 76-6-506.2; or
58 [
59 [
60 76-6-506.2; or
61 [
62 financial transaction card, including the credit number of the card, the expiration date of the
63 card, or the personal identification code related to the card:
64 [
65 [
66 of the card holder or the issuer; and
67 [
68 (2) An individual is guilty of a second degree felony who possesses, sells, or transfers
69 any information necessary for the use of 100 or more financial transaction cards, including the
70 credit number of a card, the expiration date of a card, or the personal identification code related
71 to a card:
72 (a) with intent to use the information in violation of Section 76-6-506.2; or
73 (b) with knowledge that the information will be used by another in violation of Section
74 76-6-506.2.
75 Section 3. Section 76-6-1105 is amended to read:
76 76-6-1105. Unlawful possession of another's identification documents.
77 (1) [
78 (a) "Identifying document" means:
79 [
80 [
81 [
82 identifying information as defined in Subsections 76-6-1102(1)[
83 (b) "Identifying document" includes:
84 (i) a counterfeit identifying document; or
85 (ii) a document containing personal identifying information of a deceased individual.
86 (c) "Possess" means to have physical control or electronic access.
87 (2) (a) [
88 circumstances that do not constitute a violation of Section 76-6-1102 or Section 76-6-502, an
89 individual is guilty of a class A misdemeanor if [
90 (i) obtains or possesses an identifying document:
91 (A) with knowledge that [
92 identifying document; or
93 (B) with intent to deceive or defraud; or
94 (ii) assists another person in obtaining or possessing an identifying document:
95 (A) with knowledge that the person is not entitled to obtain or possess the identifying
96 document[
97 (B) with knowledge that the person intends to use the identifying document to deceive
98 or defraud.
99 (b) [
100 76-6-1102, an individual is guilty of a third degree felony if [
101 (i) obtains or possesses [
102 than 100, individuals:
103 (A) with knowledge that [
104 [
105 (B) with intent to deceive or defraud; or
106 (ii) assists another person in obtaining or possessing [
107 of more than two, but fewer than 100, individuals:
108 (A) with knowledge that the person is not entitled to obtain or possess the multiple
109 identifying documents[
110 [
111
112 (B) with knowledge that the person intends to use the identifying documents to deceive
113 or defraud.
114 (c) Under circumstances that do not constitute a violation of Section 76-6-1102, an
115 individual is guilty of a second degree felony if the individual:
116 (i) obtains or possesses identifying documents of 100 or more individuals:
117 (A) with knowledge that the individual is not entitled to obtain or possess the
118 identifying documents; or
119 (B) with intent to deceive or defraud; or
120 (ii) assists another person in obtaining or possessing identifying documents of 100 or
121 more individuals:
122 (A) with knowledge that the person is not entitled to obtain or possess the identifying
123 documents; or
124 (B) with knowledge that the person intends to use the identifying documents to deceive
125 or defraud.
126 Section 4. Section 78B-9-104 is amended to read:
127 78B-9-104. Grounds for relief -- Retroactivity of rule.
128 (1) Unless precluded by Section 78B-9-106 or 78B-9-107, a person who has been
129 convicted and sentenced for a criminal offense may file an action in the district court of
130 original jurisdiction for post-conviction relief to vacate or modify the conviction or sentence
131 upon the following grounds:
132 (a) the conviction was obtained or the sentence was imposed in violation of the United
133 States Constitution or Utah Constitution;
134 (b) the conviction was obtained or the sentence was imposed under a statute that is in
135 violation of the United States Constitution or Utah Constitution, or the conduct for which the
136 petitioner was prosecuted is constitutionally protected;
137 (c) the sentence was imposed or probation was revoked in violation of the controlling
138 statutory provisions;
139 (d) the petitioner had ineffective assistance of counsel in violation of the United States
140 Constitution or Utah Constitution;
141 (e) newly discovered material evidence exists that requires the court to vacate the
142 conviction or sentence, because:
143 (i) neither the petitioner nor petitioner's counsel knew of the evidence at the time of
144 trial or sentencing or in time to include the evidence in any previously filed post-trial motion or
145 post-conviction proceeding, and the evidence could not have been discovered through the
146 exercise of reasonable diligence;
147 (ii) the material evidence is not merely cumulative of evidence that was known;
148 (iii) the material evidence is not merely impeachment evidence; and
149 (iv) viewed with all the other evidence, the newly discovered material evidence
150 demonstrates that no reasonable trier of fact could have found the petitioner guilty of the
151 offense or subject to the sentence received; or
152 (f) the petitioner can prove entitlement to relief under a rule announced by the United
153 States Supreme Court, the Utah Supreme Court, or the Utah Court of Appeals after conviction
154 and sentence became final on direct appeal, and that:
155 (i) the rule was dictated by precedent existing at the time the petitioner's conviction or
156 sentence became final; or
157 (ii) the rule decriminalizes the conduct that comprises the elements of the crime for
158 which the petitioner was convicted.
159 (g) the petitioner committed any of the following offenses while subject to force, fraud,
160 or coercion, as defined in Section 76-5-308:
161 (i) Section 58-37-8, possession of a controlled substance;
162 (ii) Section 76-10-1304, aiding prostitution;
163 (iii) Section 76-6-206, criminal trespass;
164 (iv) Section 76-6-413, theft;
165 (v) Section 76-6-502, possession of forged writing or device for writing;
166 (vi) Sections 76-6-602 through 76-6-608, retail theft;
167 (vii) Subsection 76-6-1105(2)(a)(i)(A), unlawful possession of another's identification
168 document;
169 (viii) Section 76-9-702, lewdness;
170 (ix) Section 76-10-1302, prostitution; or
171 (x) Section 76-10-1313, sexual solicitation.
172 (2) The court may not grant relief from a conviction or sentence unless the petitioner
173 establishes that there would be a reasonable likelihood of a more favorable outcome in light of
174 the facts proved in the post-conviction proceeding, viewed with the evidence and facts
175 introduced at trial or during sentencing.
176 (3) The court may not grant relief from a conviction based on a claim that the petitioner
177 is innocent of the crime for which convicted except as provided in Title 78B, Chapter 9, Part 3,
178 Postconviction Testing of DNA, or Part 4, Postconviction Determination of Factual Innocence.
179 Claims under Part 3, Postconviction Testing of DNA or Part 4, Postconviction Determination
180 of Factual Innocence of this chapter may not be filed as part of a petition under this part, but
181 shall be filed separately and in conformity with the provisions of Part 3, Postconviction Testing
182 of DNA or Part 4, Postconviction Determination of Factual Innocence.