1     
CODE ENFORCEMENT AMENDMENTS

2     
2019 GENERAL SESSION

3     
STATE OF UTAH

4     
Chief Sponsor: Daniel W. Thatcher

5     
House Sponsor: Paul Ray

6     

7     LONG TITLE
8     General Description:
9          This bill requires local governments to provide certain due process in code
10     enforcement.
11     Highlighted Provisions:
12          This bill:
13          ▸     prohibits local governments from:
14               •     imposing nonjudicial penalties for certain code violations unless the local
15     government provides certain written notice; and
16               •     collecting on an outstanding or pending penalty for certain code violations
17     unless the local government imposed the penalty in relation to certain written
18     notice.
19     Money Appropriated in this Bill:
20          None
21     Other Special Clauses:
22          None
23     Utah Code Sections Affected:
24     AMENDS:
25          10-3-703.7, as repealed and reenacted by Laws of Utah 2012, Chapter 175
26          17-53-228, as enacted by Laws of Utah 2013, Chapter 133
27     

28     Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:

29          Section 1. Section 10-3-703.7 is amended to read:
30          10-3-703.7. Administrative proceedings -- Penalty for code violation.
31          (1) A municipality may adopt an ordinance establishing an administrative proceeding
32     to review and decide a violation of a civil municipal ordinance.
33          (2) An ordinance adopted in accordance with Subsection (1) shall provide due process
34     for parties participating in the administrative proceeding.
35          (3) (a) A municipality may not impose a nonjudicial penalty for a violation of a land
36     use regulation or a nuisance ordinance unless the municipality provides to the individual who is
37     subject to the penalty written notice that:
38          (i) identifies the relevant regulation or ordinance at issue;
39          (ii) specifies the violation of the relevant regulation or ordinance; and
40          (iii) provides for a reasonable time to cure the violation, taking into account the cost of
41     curing the violation.
42          (b) A municipality may not collect on a nonjudicial penalty for a violation of a land use
43     regulation or a nuisance ordinance that is outstanding or pending on or after May 14, 2019,
44     unless the municipality imposed the outstanding or pending penalty in relation to a written
45     notice that:
46          (i) identified the relevant regulation or ordinance at issue;
47          (ii) specified the violation of the relevant regulation or ordinance; and
48          (iii) provided for a reasonable time to cure the violation, taking into account the cost of
49     curing the violation.
50          Section 2. Section 17-53-228 is amended to read:
51          17-53-228. Administrative hearings and procedures -- Penalty for code violation.
52          (1) A county may adopt an ordinance establishing an administrative hearing process to
53     review and decide matters relating to the violation, enforcement, or administration of a county
54     civil ordinance, including an ordinance related to the following:
55          (a) a building code;

56          (b) planning and zoning;
57          (c) animal control;
58          (d) licensing;
59          (e) health and safety;
60          (f) county employment; or
61          (g) sanitation.
62          (2) An ordinance adopted in accordance with Subsection (1) shall provide appropriate
63     due process protections for a party participating in an administrative hearing.
64          (3) An administrative hearing held in accordance with an ordinance described in
65     Subsection (1) may be conducted by an administrative law judge.
66          (4) A county may not impose a civil penalty and adjudication for the violation of a
67     county moving traffic ordinance.
68          (5) (a) A county may not impose a nonjudicial penalty for a violation of a land use
69     regulation or a nuisance ordinance unless the county provides to the individual who is subject
70     to the penalty written notice that:
71          (i) identifies the relevant regulation or ordinance at issue;
72          (ii) specifies the violation of the relevant regulation or ordinance; and
73          (iii) provides for a reasonable time to cure the violation, taking into account the cost of
74     curing the violation.
75          (b) A county may not collect on a nonjudicial penalty for a violation of a land use
76     regulation or a nuisance ordinance that is outstanding or pending on or after May 14, 2019,
77     unless the county imposed the outstanding or pending penalty in relation to a written notice
78     that:
79          (i) identified the relevant regulation or ordinance at issue;
80          (ii) specified the violation of the relevant regulation or ordinance; and
81          (iii) provided for a reasonable time to cure the violation, taking into account the cost of
82     curing the violation.

83