This document includes House Committee Amendments incorporated into the bill on Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 10:53 AM by naomigarrow.
Representative Kyle R. Andersen proposes the following substitute bill:


1     
CUSTODY AND VISITATION RIGHTS AMENDMENTS

2     
2020 GENERAL SESSION

3     
STATE OF UTAH

4     
Chief Sponsor: Kyle R. Andersen

5     
Senate Sponsor: Allen M. Christensen

6     

7     LONG TITLE
8     General Description:
9          This bill amends provisions related to custody and visitation rights of an individual
10     other than a parent.
11     Highlighted Provisions:
12          This bill:
13          ▸     addresses the Utah Supreme Court's decision in Jones v. Jones, 359 P.3d 603 (Utah
14     2015), by amending the factors that a court considers in granting visitation rights to
15     grandparents;
16          ▸     amends provisions regarding when a court may inquire, and take into account, a
17     grandchild's desires with respect to visitation;
18          ▸     amends provisions regarding custody and visitation rights for an individual other
19     than a parent; and
20          ▸     makes technical and conforming changes.
21     Money Appropriated in this Bill:
22          None
23     Other Special Clauses:
24          None
25     Utah Code Sections Affected:
26     AMENDS:
27          30-5-1, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2002, Chapter 85
28          30-5-2, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2005, Chapter 129
29          30-5a-101, as enacted by Laws of Utah 2008, Chapter 272
30          30-5a-102, as enacted by Laws of Utah 2008, Chapter 272
31          30-5a-103, as and further amended by Revisor Instructions, Laws of Utah 2018,
32     Chapter 446
33     

34     Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
35          Section 1. Section 30-5-1 is amended to read:
36          30-5-1. Definitions.
37          As used in this act:
38          (1) "District court" means the district court with proper jurisdiction over the
39     grandchild.
40          (2) "Grandchild" means the child with respect to whom a grandparent is seeking
41     visitation rights under this chapter.
42          (3) "Grandparent" means [a person] an individual whose child, either by blood,
43     marriage, or adoption, is the parent of the grandchild.
44          Section 2. Section 30-5-2 is amended to read:
45          30-5-2. Visitation rights of grandparents.
46          (1) In accordance with the provisions and requirements of this section:
47          (a) [Grandparents have] a grandparent has standing to bring an action requesting
48     visitation in district court by petition[, requesting visitation in accordance with the provisions
49     and requirements of this section. Grandparents may also]; and
50          (b) a grandparent may file a petition for visitation rights in [a pending] the juvenile
51     court or district court where a divorce proceeding or other proceeding involving custody and
52     visitation issues is pending.
53          [(2) There is a rebuttable presumption that a parent's decision with regard to
54     grandparent visitation is in the grandchild's best interests. However, the court may override the
55     parent's decision and grant the petitioner reasonable rights of visitation if the court finds that
56     the petitioner has rebutted the presumption based upon factors which the court considers to be
57     relevant, such as whether:]
58          [(a) the petitioner is a fit and proper person to have visitation with the grandchild;]
59          [(b) visitation with the grandchild has been denied or unreasonably limited;]
60          [(c) the parent is unfit or incompetent;]
61          [(d) the petitioner has acted as the grandchild's custodian or caregiver, or otherwise has
62     had a substantial relationship with the grandchild, and]
63           [the loss or cessation of that relationship is likely to cause harm to the grandchild;]
64          [(e) the petitioner's child, who is a parent of the grandchild, has died, or has become a
65     noncustodial parent through divorce or legal separation;]
66          [(f) the petitioner's child, who is a parent of the grandchild, has been missing for an
67     extended period of time; or]
68          [(g) visitation is in the best interest of the grandchild.]
69          (2) (a) In accordance with Section 62A-4a-201, it is the public policy of this state that a
70     parent retains the fundamental right and duty to exercise primary control over the care,
71     supervision, upbringing, and education of the parent's children.
72          (b) A court shall presume that a parent's decision in regard to grandparent visitation is
73     in the best interest of the parent's child.
74          (3) A court may find the presumption in Subsection (2)(b) rebutted if the grandparent,
75     by clear and convincing evidence, establishes that:
76          (a) the grandparent has filled the role of custodian or caregiver to the grandchild that:
77          (i) is in a manner akin to a parent; and
78          (ii) the loss of the relationship between the grandparent and the grandchild would cause
79     substantial harm to the grandchild; or
80          (b) both parents are unfit or incompetent in a manner that causes potential harm to the
81     grandchild.
82          (4) (a) If the court finds the presumption in Subsection (2)(b) is rebutted, the court may
83     consider whether grandparent visitation is in the best interest of the grandchild.
84          (b) If the court considers whether grandparent visitation is in the best interest of the
85     child, the court shall take into account the totality of the circumstances, including:
86          (i) the reasonableness of the parent's decision to deny grandparent visitation;
87          (ii) the age of the grandchild;
88          (iii) the death or unavailability of a parent; and
89          (iv) if the grandchild is 14 years old or older, the grandchild's desires regarding
90     visitation after the court inquires of the grandchild.
91          (5) If the court finds the presumption in Subsection (2)(b) is rebutted and grandparent
92     visitation is in the best interest of the grandchild, the court may issue an order for grandparent
93     visitation.
94          [(3)] (6) The adoption of a grandchild by the grandchild's stepparent does not diminish
95     or alter visitation rights previously ordered under this section.
96          [(4) Subject to the provisions of Subsections (2) and (3), the court may inquire of the
97     grandchild and take into account the grandchild's desires regarding visitation.]
98          [(5)] (7) On the petition of a grandparent or the legal custodian of a grandchild the
99     court may, after a hearing, modify an order regarding grandparent visitation if:
100          (a) the circumstances of the grandchild, the grandparent, or the custodian have
101     materially and substantially changed since the entry of the order to be modified, or the order
102     has become unworkable or inappropriate under existing circumstances; and
103          (b) the court determines that a modification is appropriate based upon the factors set
104     forth in [Subsection (2)] Subsections (3) and (4).
105          [(6)] (8) [Grandparents] A grandparent may petition the court to remedy a parent's
106     wrongful noncompliance with a visitation order.
107          Section 3. Section 30-5a-101 is amended to read:
108     
CHAPTER 5a. CUSTODY AND VISITATION FOR INDIVIDUALS

109     
OTHER THAN PARENTS ACT

110          30-5a-101. Title.
111          This chapter is known as the "Custody and Visitation for [Persons] Individuals Other
112     than Parents Act."
113          Section 4. Section 30-5a-102 is amended to read:
114          30-5a-102. Definitions.
115          As used in this chapter:
116          [(1) "Parent" means a biological or adoptive parent.]
117          [(2)] (1) "[Person] Individual other than a parent" means [a person] an individual who
118     is not a parent and is related to the child by marriage or blood, including:
119          (a) siblings;
120          (b) aunts;
121          (c) uncles;
122          (d) grandparents; or
123          (e) current or former step-parents, or any of the [persons] individuals described in
124     Subsections [(2)] (1)(a) through (d) in a step relationship to the child.
125          (2) "Parent" means a biological or adoptive parent.
126          Section 5. Section 30-5a-103 is amended to read:
127          30-5a-103. Custody and visitation for individuals other than a parent.
128          (1) (a) In accordance with Section 62A-4a-201, it is the public policy of this state that
129     [parents] a parent retain the fundamental right and duty to exercise primary control over the
130     care, supervision, upbringing, and education of [their] the parent's children.
131          (b) There is a rebuttable presumption that a parent's decisions are in the child's best
132     interests.
133          (2) A court may find the presumption in Subsection (1) rebutted and grant custodial or
134     visitation rights to [a person] an individual other than a parent who, by clear and convincing
135     evidence, [has established all of the following] establishes that:
136          (a) the [person] individual has intentionally assumed the role and obligations of a
137     parent;
138          (b) the [person] individual and the child have formed [an] a substantial emotional bond
139     and created a parent-child type relationship;
140          (c) the [person] individual substantially contributed emotionally Ĥ→ [[] or [] and] ←Ĥ
140a      financially to
141     the child's well being;
142          (d) the assumption of the parental role is not the result of a financially compensated
143     surrogate care arrangement;
144          (e) the continuation of the relationship between the [person] individual and the child
145     [would be] is in the child's best [interests] interest;
146          (f) the loss or cessation of the relationship between the [person] individual and the
147     child would [be detrimental to] substantially harm the child; and
148          (g) the parent:
149          (i) is absent; or
150          (ii) is found by a court to have abused or neglected the child.
151          (3) A proceeding under this chapter may be commenced by filing a verified petition, or
152     petition supported by an affidavit, in the juvenile court if a matter is pending, or in the district
153     court in the county [in which] where the child:
154          (a) currently resides; or
155          (b) lived with a parent or [a person] an individual other than a parent who acted as a
156     parent within six months before the commencement of the action.
157          (4) A proceeding under this chapter may be filed in a pending divorce, parentage
158     action, or other proceeding, including a proceeding in the juvenile court[,] involving custody of
159     or visitation with a child.
160          (5) The petition shall include detailed facts supporting the petitioner's right to file the
161     petition including the criteria set forth in Subsection (2) and residency information as set forth
162     in Section 78B-13-209.
163          (6) A proceeding under this chapter may not be filed against a parent who is actively
164     serving outside the state in any branch of the military.
165          (7) Notice of a petition filed pursuant to this chapter shall be served in accordance with
166     the rules of civil procedure on all of the following:
167          (a) the child's biological, adopted, presumed, declarant, and adjudicated parents;
168          (b) any [person] individual who has court-ordered custody or visitation rights;
169          (c) the child's guardian;
170          (d) the guardian ad litem, if one has been appointed;
171          (e) [a person] an individual or agency that has physical custody of the child or that
172     claims to have custody or visitation rights; and
173          (f) any other [person] individual or agency that has previously appeared in any action
174     regarding custody of or visitation with the child.
175          (8) The court may order a custody evaluation to be conducted in any action brought
176     under this chapter.
177          (9) The court may enter temporary orders in an action brought under this chapter
178     pending the entry of final orders.
179          (10) Except as provided in Subsection (11), a court may not grant custody of a child
180     under this section to an individual who is not the [biological or adoptive] parent of the child
181     and who, before a custody order is issued, is convicted, pleads guilty, or pleads no contest to a
182     felony or attempted felony involving conduct that constitutes any of the following:
183          (a) child abuse, as described in Section 76-5-109;
184          (b) child abuse homicide, as described in Section 76-5-208;
185          (c) child kidnapping, as described in Section 76-5-301.1;
186          (d) human trafficking of a child, as described in Section 76-5-308.5;
187          (e) sexual abuse of a minor, as described in Section 76-5-401.1;
188          (f) rape of a child, as described in Section 76-5-402.1;
189          (g) object rape of a child, as described in Section 76-5-402.3;
190          (h) sodomy on a child, as described in Section 76-5-403.1;
191          (i) sexual abuse of a child or aggravated sexual abuse of a child, as described in
192     Section 76-5-404.1;
193          (j) sexual exploitation of a minor, as described in Section 76-5b-201; or
194          (k) an offense in another state that, if committed in this state, would constitute an
195     offense described in this Subsection (10).
196          (11) (a) [For purpose of] As used in this Subsection (11), "disqualifying offense"
197     means an offense listed in Subsection (10) that prevents a court from granting custody except
198     as provided in this Subsection (11).
199          (b) [A person] An individual described in Subsection (10) may only be considered for
200     custody of a child if the following criteria are met by clear and convincing evidence:
201          (i) the [person] individual is a relative, as defined in Section 78A-6-307, of the child;
202          (ii) at least 10 years have elapsed from the day on which the [person] individual is
203     successfully released from prison, jail, parole, or probation related to a disqualifying offense;
204          (iii) during the 10 years before the day on which the [person] individual files a petition
205     with the court seeking custody the [person] individual has not been convicted, plead guilty, or
206     plead no contest to an offense greater than an infraction or traffic violation that would likely
207     impact the health, safety, or well-being of the child;
208          (iv) the [person] individual can provide evidence of successful treatment or
209     rehabilitation directly related to the disqualifying offense;
210          (v) the court determines that the risk related to the disqualifying offense is unlikely to
211     cause harm, as defined in Section 78A-6-105, or potential harm to the child currently or at any
212     time in the future when considering all of the following:
213          (A) the child's age;
214          (B) the child's gender;
215          (C) the child's development;
216          (D) the nature and seriousness of the disqualifying offense;
217          (E) the preferences of a child 12 years [of age] old or older;
218          (F) any available assessments, including custody evaluations, parenting assessments,
219     psychological or mental health assessments, and bonding assessments; and
220          (G) any other relevant information;
221          (vi) the [person] individual can provide evidence of the following:
222          (A) the relationship with the child is of long duration;
223          (B) that an emotional bond exists with the child; and
224          (C) that custody by the [person] individual who has committed the disqualifying
225     offense ensures the best interests of the child are met;
226          (vii) (A) there is no other responsible relative known to the court who has or likely
227     could develop an emotional bond with the child and does not have a disqualifying offense; or
228          (B) if there is a responsible relative known to the court that does not have a
229     disqualifying offense, Subsection (11)(d) applies; and
230          (viii) that the continuation of the relationship between the [person] individual with the
231     disqualifying offense and the child could not be sufficiently maintained through any type of
232     visitation if custody were given to the relative with no disqualifying offense described in
233     Subsection (11)(d).
234          (c) The [person] individual with the disqualifying offense bears the burden of proof
235     regarding why placement with that [person] individual is in the best interest of the child over
236     another responsible relative or equally situated [person] individual who does not have a
237     disqualifying offense.
238          (d) If, as provided in Subsection (11)(b)(vii)(B), there is a responsible relative known
239     to the court who does not have a disqualifying offense:
240          (i) preference for custody is given to a relative who does not have a disqualifying
241     offense; and
242          (ii) before the court may place custody with the [person] individual who has the
243     disqualifying offense over another responsible, willing, and able relative:
244          (A) an impartial custody evaluation shall be completed; and
245          (B) a guardian ad litem shall be assigned.
246          (12) Subsections (10) and (11) apply to a case pending on March 25, 2017, for which a
247     final decision on custody has not been made and to a case filed on or after March 25, 2017.