This document includes Senate Committee Amendments incorporated into the bill on Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 5:35 PM by lpoole.
This document includes Senate 3rd Reading Floor Amendments incorporated into the bill on Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 8:44 PM by lpoole.



Chief Sponsor: Daniel W. Thatcher

House Sponsor: V. Lowry Snow


8     General Description:
9          This bill provides for mitigation of certain criminal charges related to cohabitant abuse.
10     Highlighted Provisions:
11          This bill:
12          ▸     defines terms;
13          ▸     provides for an offense reduction for an individual convicted of an offense if the
14     individual committed the offense as a result of cohabitant abuse; and
15          ▸     provides procedures for proving and finding an individual is entitled to the offense
16     reduction in court.
17     Money Appropriated in this Bill:
18          None
19     Other Special Clauses:
20          None
21     Utah Code Sections Affected:
22     ENACTS:
23          76-2-409, Utah Code Annotated 1953

25     Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
26          Section 1. Section 76-2-409 is enacted to read:
27          76-2-409. Battered person mitigation.

28          (1) As used in this section:
29          (a) "Abuse" means the same as that term is defined in Section 78B-7-102.
30          (b) "Cohabitant" means:
31          (i) the same as that term is defined in Section 78B-7-102; or
32          (ii) the relationship of a minor and a natural parent, an adoptive parent, a stepparent, or
33     an individual living with the minor's natural parent as if a stepparent to the minor.
34          (2) (a) An individual is entitled to battered person mitigation if:
35          (i) the individual committed a criminal offense that was not legally justified;
36          (ii) the individual committed the criminal offense against a cohabitant who
37     demonstrated a pattern of abuse against the individual or another cohabitant of the individual;
38     and
39          (iii) the individual reasonably believed that the criminal offense was necessary to end
40     the pattern of abuse.
41          (b) A reasonable belief under Subsection (2)(a) is determined from the viewpoint of a
42     reasonable person in the individual's circumstances, as the individual's circumstances are
43     perceived by the individual.
44          (3) An individual claiming mitigation under Subsection (2)(a) has the burden of
45     proving, by clear and convincing evidence, each element that would entitle the individual to
46     mitigation under Subsection (2)(a).
47          (4) Mitigation under Subsection (2)(a) results in a one-step reduction of the level of
48     offense of which the individual is convicted.
49          (5) Ŝ→ (a) ←Ŝ If the trier of fact is a jury, an individual is not entitled to mitigation under
50     Subsection (2)(a) unless the jury:
51          Ŝ→ [
(a)] (i) ←Ŝ finds the individual proved, in accordance with Subsection (3), that the
51a     individual is
52     entitled to mitigation by unanimous vote; and
53          Ŝ→ [
(b)] (ii) ←Ŝ returns a special verdict for the reduced charge at the same time the jury
53a     returns the
54     general verdict.
54a1     Ŝ→      (b) A non unanimous vote by the jury on the question of mitigation under Subsection
54b2     (2)(a) does not result in a hung jury. ←Ŝ
54a     Ŝ→      (6) An individual intending to claim mitigation under Subsection (2)(a) at the
54b     individual's trial shall give notice of the individual's intent to claim mitigation under
54c     Subsection (2)(a) to the prosecuting agency at least 30 days before the individual's trial. ←Ŝ