1     
JOINT RESOLUTION ON INTERNET CENSORSHIP

2     
2021 GENERAL SESSION

3     
STATE OF UTAH

4     
Chief Sponsor: Travis M. Seegmiller

5     
Senate Sponsor: ____________

6     

7     LONG TITLE
8     General Description:
9          This joint resolution of the Legislature calls for the Legislature to investigate the
10     censorship practices of online platforms and the potential for state action to address
11     those practices.
12     Highlighted Provisions:
13          This bill:
14          ▸     calls for an investigation into the practices of online platforms in limiting free
15     speech, including:
16               •     the current status of federal legislation and regulation pertaining to online
17     platform immunity;
18               •     the content moderation practices of online platforms; and
19               •     citizens' experiences of viewpoint censorship while using online platforms; and
20          ▸     calls for a legislative study that explores potential solutions to issues identified in
21     the investigation.
22     Money Appropriated in this Bill:
23          None
24     Other Special Clauses:
25          None
26     

27     Be it resolved by the Legislature of the state of Utah:

28          WHEREAS, according to the Executive Order on Preventing Online Censorship, issued
29     on May 28, 2020:
30          ▸     "The growth of online platforms in recent years raises important questions about
31     applying the ideals of the First Amendment to modern communications
32     technology";
33          ▸     "Today, many Americans follow the news, stay in touch with friends and family,
34     and share their views on current events through social media and other
35     platforms";
36          ▸     Social media platforms "function in many ways as a 21st century equivalent of
37     the public square"; and
38          ▸     "Tens of thousands of Americans have reported, among other troubling
39     behaviors, online platforms 'flagging' content as inappropriate, even though it
40     does not violate any stated terms of service; making unannounced and
41     unexplained changes to company polices that have the effect of disfavoring
42     certain viewpoints; and deleting content and entire accounts with no warning, no
43     rationale, and no recourse";
44          WHEREAS, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act offers broad immunity
45     to Internet companies for hosting user-generated content and moderating content on their sites,
46     which has led to an inability to regulate the moderation practices of some of the largest
47     corporations in the world;
48          WHEREAS, members of both political parties have recognized that Section 230 of the
49     Communications Decency Act, which governs Internet use, is ripe for reform;
50          WHEREAS, the power of some online platforms to control the types of speech made
51     available to the public was recently made apparent in the January 2021 decisions of some
52     online platforms to suspend the account of the then-President of the United States;
53          WHEREAS, in January 2021, some online companies demonstrated their power to
54     make unavailable a social media platform that was used by millions of people; and
55          WHEREAS, free speech and diversity of opinion is critical to the strength, health, and
56     endurance of our American political system:
57          NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Legislature of the state of Utah calls
58     for a legislative investigation into whether online platforms inhibit free speech, including:

59          ▸     the current status of federal legislation and regulation pertaining to online
60     platforms' immunity from liability with respect to their moderation practices;
61          ▸     the content moderation practices of online platforms; and
62          ▸     Utahns' experiences of viewpoint censorship while using online platforms.
63          BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Legislature of the state of Utah calls for a
64     legislative study that explores:
65          ▸     whether state-level solutions exist to regulate the moderation practices of online
66     platforms;
67          ▸     options for policy development at the state level that would ensure all Utahns
68     the right to express their viewpoints on online platforms without fear of
69     censorship;
70          ▸     state spending in connection with online platforms that engage in online
71     censorship; and
72          ▸     the potential to encourage online platforms to become forums that enable the
73     open and robust sharing of political opinions and opposing viewpoints.