Representative Matt MacPherson proposes the following substitute bill:


1     
ECONOMIC INTERRUPTION AMENDMENTS

2     
2024 GENERAL SESSION

3     
STATE OF UTAH

4     
Chief Sponsor: Matt MacPherson

5     
Senate Sponsor: Luz Escamilla

6     

7     LONG TITLE
8     General Description:
9          This bill addresses the economic interruption of a business or governmental entity due
10     to property damage or theft.
11     Highlighted Provisions:
12          This bill:
13          ▸     defines terms;
14          ▸     creates a crime for property damage resulting in economic interruption of a business
15     or governmental entity;
16          ▸     creates a sentencing enhancement for property damage resulting in economic
17     interruption of a business or governmental entity when the defendant has previous
18     convictions of that same offense;
19          ▸     creates a crime for theft resulting in economic interruption of a business or
20     governmental entity; and
21          ▸     creates a sentencing enhancement for theft resulting in economic interruption of a
22     business or governmental entity when the defendant has previous convictions of that
23     same offense.
24     Money Appropriated in this Bill:
25          None

26     Other Special Clauses:
27          None
28     Utah Code Sections Affected:
29     ENACTS:
30          76-6-113, Utah Code Annotated 1953
31          76-6-414, Utah Code Annotated 1953
32     

33     Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
34          Section 1. Section 76-6-113 is enacted to read:
35          76-6-113. Property damage resulting in economic interruption -- Enhanced
36     penalties.
37          (1) (a) As used in this section:
38          (i) "Business" means an enterprise carried on for the purpose of gain or economic
39     profit.
40          (ii) "Governmental entity" means the state, a county, a municipality, a special district, a
41     special service district, a school district, a state institution of higher education, or any other
42     political subdivision or administrative unit of the state.
43          (iii) "Economic interruption" means any disruption or cessation to the operations of a
44     business or governmental entity that results in:
45          (A) the business or governmental entity ceasing operations for at least one day; or
46          (B) the employees of the business or governmental entity being unable to perform labor
47     for the business or governmental entity for at least one day.
48          (b) Terms defined in Sections 76-1-101.5 and 76-6-101 apply to this section.
49          (2) An actor commits property damage resulting in economic interruption if:
50          (a) the actor damages, defaces, or destroys a business's or governmental entity's
51     property; and
52          (b) the actor's actions under Subsection (2)(a) cause an economic interruption for the
53     business or governmental entity.
54          (3) A violation of Subsection (2) is a class A misdemeanor.
55          (4) It is not a defense under this section that:
56          (a) the actor committing the offense did not intend to cause economic interruption to

57     the business or governmental entity; or
58          (b) the actor did not know that the victim is a business or governmental entity.
59          (5) If the trier of facts finds that the actor committed a violation of Subsection (2), the
60     actor is guilty of:
61          (a) a third degree felony if the actor has two prior convictions for a violation of
62     Subsection (2) within five years before the day on which the actor committed the most recent
63     violation of Subsection (2); and
64          (b) a second degree felony if the actor has at least three prior convictions for a violation
65     of Subsection (2) within five years before the day on which the actor committed the most
66     recent violation of Subsection (2).
67          (6) A prior conviction used for a penalty enhancement under Subsection (5) is a
68     conviction that is from a separate criminal episode than:
69          (a) the most recent violation of Subsection (2); and
70          (b) any other prior conviction that is used to enhance the penalty for the most recent
71     violation of Subsection (2).
72          (7) The prosecuting attorney, or the grand jury if an indictment is returned, shall
73     include notice in the information or indictment that the offense is subject to an enhancement
74     under Subsection (5).
75          Section 2. Section 76-6-414 is enacted to read:
76          76-6-414. Theft resulting in economic interruption -- Enhanced penalties.
77          (1) (a) As used in this section:
78          (i) "Business" means the same as that term is defined in Section 76-6-113.
79          (ii) "Governmental entity" means the same as that term is defined in Section 76-6-113.
80          (iii) "Economic interruption" means the same as that term is defined in Section
81     76-6-113.
82          (b) Terms defined in Sections 76-1-101.5 and 76-6-401 apply to this section.
83          (2) An actor commits theft resulting in economic interruption if:
84          (a) the actor obtains or exercises unauthorized control over a business's or
85     governmental entity's property with the intent to deprive the business or governmental entity of
86     the property; and
87          (b) the actor's actions under Subsection (2)(a) cause an economic interruption for the

88     business or governmental entity.
89          (3) A violation of Subsection (2) is a class A misdemeanor.
90          (4) It is not a defense under this section that:
91          (a) the actor committing the offense did not intend for the business or governmental
92     entity to incur the cost of the economic interruption; or
93          (b) the actor did not know that the victim is a business or governmental entity.
94          (5) If the trier of facts finds that the actor committed a violation of Subsection (2), the
95     actor is guilty of:
96          (a) a third degree felony if the actor has two prior convictions for a violation of
97     Subsection (2) within five years before the day on which the actor committed the most recent
98     violation of Subsection (2); and
99          (b) a second degree felony if the actor has at least three prior convictions for a violation
100     of Subsection (2) within five years before the day on which the actor committed the most
101     recent violation of Subsection (2).
102          (6) A prior conviction used for a penalty enhancement under Subsection (5) is a
103     conviction that is from a separate criminal episode than:
104          (a) the most recent violation of Subsection (2); and
105          (b) any other prior conviction that is used to enhance the penalty for the most recent
106     violation of Subsection (2).
107          (7) The prosecuting attorney, or the grand jury if an indictment is returned, shall
108     include notice in the information or indictment that the offense is subject to an enhancement
109     under Subsection (5).
110          Section 3. Effective date.
111          This bill takes effect on May 1, 2024.