Download Zipped Enrolled WordPerfect SB0078.ZIP
[Introduced][Status][Bill Documents][Fiscal Note][Bills Directory]

S.B. 78 Enrolled

             1     

WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT AMENDMENTS

             2     
2012 GENERAL SESSION

             3     
STATE OF UTAH

             4     
Chief Sponsor: John L. Valentine

             5     
House Sponsor: Bradley M. Daw

             6     
             7      LONG TITLE
             8      General Description:
             9          This bill directs the Revenue and Taxation Interim Committee to conduct a study of the
             10      proper allocation of water costs to the rate structure charged for water customers.
             11      Highlighted Provisions:
             12          This bill:
             13          .    directs the Revenue and Taxation Interim Committee in 2012 to study the proper
             14      allocation of water costs to the rate structure charged for water customers.
             15      Money Appropriated in this Bill:
             16          None
             17      Other Special Clauses:
             18          None
             19      Uncodified Material Affected:
             20      ENACTS UNCODIFIED MATERIAL
             21     
             22      Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
             23          Section 1. Revenue and Taxation Interim Committee study of issues related to the
             24      financing of water services.
             25          In 2012, the Revenue and Taxation Interim Committee shall conduct a study of the
             26      proper allocation of water costs to the rate structure charged for water customers, including a
             27      study of:
             28          (1) the proper allocation of repair and replacement costs for infrastructure by a water
             29      conservancy district;


             30          (2) the proper method of financing new and related water infrastructure;
             31          (3) the proper allocation of funds to comply with applicable federal mitigation
             32      requirements;
             33          (4) the impact on development by impact fees or hook-up fees charged by a water
             34      conservancy district;
             35          (5) the advisability of establishing a sinking fund to fund replacement costs or building
             36      new projects and infrastructure;
             37          (6) methods to effectively charge for the delivery and acquisition of water;
             38          (7) the efficacy of or need for various water conservancy district programs, including
             39      variable rate processing, education programs, landscape ordinances, and multi-tier rate
             40      structures;
             41          (8) the allocation of costs and financing methods used in surrounding states for water
             42      projects; and
             43          (9) the role of conservation in water pricing and supply adequacy for future water
             44      needs.


[Bill Documents][Bills Directory]