Information Technology Commission
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY COMMISSION
August 27, 1997 - 1:30 p.m.- Room 403, State Capitol
Sen. David H. Steele, Chair
Rep. Blake d. Chard, Chair
Sen. Scott N. Howell
Rep. Brent H. Goodfellow
Mr. Cliff L. Ames
Mr. Gerald R. Capps
Mr. Peter R. Genereaux
Ms. Nancy Gibbs
Mr. Randall G. Harmsen
Mr. Robert W. Hood
Judge Norman H. Jackson
Ms. Eileen B. Longsworth
Commissioner Stephen F. Mecham
Mr. Leon Miller
Mr. David A. Packer
Dr. Mike Petersen
Mr. Gordon A. Peterson
Mr. Jerry P. Peterson
Members Absent:
Rep. Martin Stephens
Members Excused:
Sen. Craig L. Taylor
Staff Present:
Mr. Richard North,
Executive Director
Ms. Tani Pack Downing,
Associate General Counsel
Ms. Junie Anderson,
Committee Secretary
Note: A list of others present and a copy of materials distributed in the meeting are on file in the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel.
1. Call to Order - Chair Steele called the meeting to order at 1:34 p.m.
MOTION: Robert Hood moved to approve the minutes of the July 17, 1997 meeting as amended. The motion passed unanimously.
2. How Data Privacy Is Protected In Government - State & Federal. _ Richard North, Executive Director, Information Technology Commission, gave a slide presentation regarding data privacy in government. He distributed a chart providing information from each of the fifty states, including the District of Columbia, which displayed significant court decisions affecting privacy. He spoke about the privacy policy options for both the public and private sector and distributed a handout titled, "Information Technology - Legislative Policy Options - 1997." He explained the information furnished in the handout and suggested that commission members may wish additional study on some issues. A discussion pertaining to "the presumption" and definition of ownership ensued.
Tani Pack Downing, Associate General Counsel, Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel, explained that, at this time, "the presumption" is that information is public so
that people can collect it and share it. However, now that the state is moving into an electronic
age, that may
change. She indicated there may be opposition from business and government communities about making personal information inaccessible to them as related to the efficiency
of government and the market. She said that the European Union and Canada are allowing
individuals to control their own personal information. Organizations can only use an
individual's private information for the purpose for which it is being collected unless the
individual owner opts to allow the organization to sell or give away the information.
Mr. North said many data bases have already been created but it is important to examine
how the data bases are managed in the future to ensure that government, businesses, and
individuals all benefit from the process. He said that many states are guaranteeing individuals
access to information contained in their records.
Ms. Longsworth said there needs to be serious consequences for someone who
deliberately chooses to reveal private information inappropriately.
3. How Can Individual Privacy Be Protected In the Electronic Age? _ Gordon Peterson, Chief Information Officer, State of Utah,
distributed an outline titled, "Privacy and the National Information Infrastructure: Principles for Providing and Using Personal Information." He
explained the contents of the outline.
He also distributed a document titled, "Make Utah a world leader in Information Technology." He discussed how privacy can be protected. He explained
that value cards and digital signatures are sources of technology to protect individual privacy.
Mr. Peterson said digital signature is another way to authenticate transactions and that
Utah has been a leader of the digital signature, being the first entity in the world to pass
legislation on it. He reported that Utah is starting a pilot project next month relative to the work
that Digital Signature Trust is doing with the state on value cards.
Ms. Longsworth said an important issue is that people's comfort level with technology is
mixed and the only way for a card to be successful is to give it a dual approach and allow people
the option to not have it. Mr. Hood supported a dual system so individuals have an alternative.
Bart Blackstock, Department of Public Safety, Driver License Division, explained that
the Driver License Division supports a new electronic driver license. He did not support a dual
system because of the possibility of mistakes.
Ms. Downing distributed several news articles pertaining to privacy titled, "AOL Backs
Off Plan to Give Out Phone Numbers," "Privacy Protections Raise Concerns," and "The New
Data Czars." She explained the contents of the articles.
4. Committee Business - Membership _ Mr. Ned Hill resigned from the committee due to new responsibilities as special assistant to the President of Brigham Young University. Chair
Steele explained the procedure for filling the vacant seat with a prospective member. He said the
submission date for applications is October 1, 1997.
MOTION: Nancy Gibbs moved to adjourn the meeting at 3:37 p.m. The motion passed unanimously.
[Back to the Interim Directory][Back to the Monthly Schedule][Back to the Committee Listing] Utah State Legislature