Compendium of Budget Information for the 2010 General Session

Capital Facilities & Government Operations
Appropriations Subcommittee
Subcommittee Table of Contents

Agency: Career Service Review Board

Function

The Career Service Review Board (CSRB) is a quasi-judicial body that administers the state's grievance and appeals process. The Board hears cases related to decisions about promotions, dismissals, demotions, suspensions, written reprimands, wages, salary, violations of personnel rules, issues concerning the equitable administration of benefits, reductions in force, and disputes concerning abandonment of position. The goal is to resolve grievances at the lowest possible managerial level. The Board has no jurisdiction over classification grievances, which are governed by Department of Human Resource Management.

The CSRB conducts pre-hearing conferences in an attempt to mediate many of the cases which come before them. When necessary they conduct jurisdictional, evidentiary, and appellate levels of adjudications as a means of resolving disputes

The CSRB conducts hearings as efficiently as possible using contracted hearing officers. The only ongoing salary costs are for the administrator and a secretary.

Statutory Authority

UCA 67-19a-101 defines 'grievance' as a complaint by a career service employee concerning any matter touching upon the relationship between the employee and his/her employer; and any dispute between a career service employee and his/her employer.

UCA 67-19a-202 gives the board jurisdiction to serve as the final administrative body to review appeals from career service employees and agencies.

UCA 67-19a-204 requires the board to make rules governing the appeals process.

UCA 67-19a-204 requires the governor to appoint the administrator who may assign hearing officers to each case; subpoena witnesses, documents, and other evidence; and quash unreasonable subpoenas.

UCA 67-19a-303 delineates employees' rights in a grievance and appeals procedure. Employees may have representation, use a reasonable amount of time during work hours to confer with the representative, and may not have reprisals taken against them for using grievance procedures.

UCA 67-19a-401 through 408 list the procedural steps to be followed by the employee and the employer, including the administrator's power to require a pre-hearing conference.

Intent Language

    Under terms of UCA 63J-1-402(3), the Legislature intends not to lapse Item 53, Chapter 2, or Item 39, Chapter 392, Laws of Utah 2008. Expenditure of these funds is limited to: Grievance Resolution - $15,000.

Funding Detail

Sources of Finance
2006
Actual
2007
Actual
2008
Actual
2009
Actual
2010
Approp
General Fund $189,800 $218,300 $228,200 $227,500 $227,500
General Fund, One-time $0 ($200) $0 $2,500 $0
Beginning Nonlapsing $900 $200 $5,000 $5,000 $0
Closing Nonlapsing ($200) ($5,000) ($5,000) ($15,000) $0
Lapsing Balance $0 ($1,500) ($9,100) ($13,500) $0
Total
$190,500
$211,800
$219,100
$206,500
$227,500
 
Line Items
2006
Actual
2007
Actual
2008
Actual
2009
Actual
2010
Approp
Career Service Review Board $190,500 $211,800 $219,100 $206,500 $227,500
Total
$190,500
$211,800
$219,100
$206,500
$227,500
 
Categories of Expenditure
2006
Actual
2007
Actual
2008
Actual
2009
Actual
2010
Approp
Personnel Services $159,400 $174,100 $183,500 $187,000 $188,700
In-state Travel $0 $0 $0 $0 $300
Current Expense $28,500 $34,700 $31,300 $16,300 $34,000
DP Current Expense $2,600 $3,000 $4,300 $3,200 $4,500
Total
$190,500
$211,800
$219,100
$206,500
$227,500
 
Other Indicators
2006
Actual
2007
Actual
2008
Actual
2009
Actual
2010
Approp
Budgeted FTE 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Actual FTE 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0






Subcommittee Table of Contents