From: Kerry To: Rep. McKell, M., Subject: Re: Rule of law Date: 2014-06-07T02:07:10Z Body:
Historical is not always in one persons control. Even after proof of the FMCSA rules and my compliance the temporary orders have not been changed. I see no standard in this law! It gives the commissioner complete power to destroy a persons life. This is tyranny! It is also the same mentality that give assault weapons and vehicles to the BLM! Alimony should never be granted!
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 6, 2014, at 4:46 PM, Michael Mckell wrote:
>
> Kerry,
>
> Thank you for sharing your concerns with me. It seems like you have judge
> you don't agree with. That is exactly why we grant temporary orders so we
> have time to adjust and get is right. What do you think should be changed
> in the law? Is there a better standard than historical earnings? I have
> seen one spouse or the other reduce earnings as they go through a divorce
> in an effort to reduce child support and alimony. Is there a better way
> to do it without allowing fraud. I look forward to your suggestions.
>
> Mike McKell
>
>
> --
> Representative Michael K. McKell
> Utah State Legislature
> House of Representatives
> House District 66
> 642 Kirby Lane, Suite 105
> Spanish Fork, Utah 84660
> (801) 210-1495 cell
> mmckell@le.utah.gov
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> On 6/5/14 12:13 PM, "Kerry" wrote:
>>
>>
>> To whom it may concern:
>>
>> I would love for you to explain to me how Utah's law on child support and
>> temporary support or alimony lay out any kind of "rule of law" or
>> guideline to be followed. As I read it the first part states should be
>> based on a normal work week. It then foes on to give "absolute" power to
>> the commissioner or judge to base it on historical earnings or overtime
>> if they decide it will continue. They can be presented with FMCSA
>> regulations that show this cannot be achieved and still award a
>> ridiculous amount and "stack the deck" in favor of the woman for the
>> custody battle and even force people into bankruptcy. ORS is given the
>> power and apparently the obligation to withhold income without "due
>> process".
>>
>> I did manage to get a hearing to amend these "temporary orders" that have
>> me on the edge of homelessness. This was a waste of time as commissioner
>> Conklin was unwilling to admit her mistake and correct it.
>>
>> I am curious if you can give me any reason to even bother voting ever
>> again? Or even pay future taxes to this corrupt system we have now.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Kerry Roche
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>