To: Rep. Perry, L.,
Subject: cc: Utah State Legislators / Criminal Complaints to Barlow / FBI
The following photo of Requa/Hoover Files boxes stamped by law office Ray Quinney & Nebeker and with Bowers as filmed, speaks for itself. The bulk of the Requa/Hoover Files were at RQN where Davis and his father had seen them “at least 8 times”, and from where they sent a few token ones to Bowers (as pictured with RQN stamp on boxes) to maintain the Medley Court Fraud and Charade (and so that RQN was not to be suspected as having them after contriving the Medley Cort Fraud, but in fact did.
1) Said Bowers and Caspar were aware from where the R/H Files and the trivial boxes pictured had come, and thus from where the bulk of the R/H Files were being held (at RQN) as the result of many criminal acts associated with RQN obtaining them secretly and covertly by a judical fraud; the court proceedings were wholly fraudulent and criminal in all respects [including its appointment of a former RQN attorney, Caspar as the receiver]; RQN had no apparent or legitimate connection to them [Medley Actions];
2) This was, as evident in the picture, of certain knowledge to Bowers and assuredly Caspar;
3)Bowers is thus alleged as a major criminal accomplice over a lengthy period of time with said alleged organized criminal operation with the intent to maintain the cover-up of where the Requa/Hoover Files had in fact been concealed and the great extent and value of these historic files, as were covertly stolen with subsequent cover-ups, as is evident in the findings of Steven Davis and the pervasively evidenced and alleged crimes of Roger Bowers as a petty accomplice to whom no files of consequence would have been sent. Bowers' statements in book chapter are alleged as pervasively fraudulent to a deranged and criminal degree with assistance in their making: http://www.greatgoldgrab.com/Chapters24_25.pdf Both Bowers and Caspar are thus equally, and of necessity, to be alleged as in fact criminally in the employ of RQN.
All the acts of the Receivership are thus to be alleged — as in the Court Records to be seen, such as in the reports by Caspar to shareholders — to have been fraudulently made in fact for the interests not of Banner shareholders, but rather those of RQN.
If Davis’ intention in his emails to get Bowers to confess and assist in “taking down RQN and Kirton McConkie”, and if this were known to the Davis-alleged RQN agent engaged previously against Banner International (Anthony Schofield) and then at Kirton McConkie, it would not perhaps be surprising for him to write a letter to Davis threatening his arrest as follows (perhaps pressure on Davis? Perhaps to discontinue his Banner/R/H Files investigations that were proceeding, as evidenced, in the direction of “taking him down”?