Download Zipped Introduced WP 8.0 HB0367.ZIP 5,543 Bytes
[Status][Bill Documents][Fiscal Note][Bills Directory]
H.B. 367
1
2
3
4
5
6 AN ACT RELATING TO FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS; ADDRESSING THE APPLICATION
7 OF PROVISIONS ON MORTGAGE LOAN RESERVE ACCOUNTS; AND MAKING
8 TECHNICAL CHANGES.
9 This act affects sections of Utah Code Annotated 1953 as follows:
10 AMENDS:
11 7-17-1, as enacted by Chapter 124, Laws of Utah 1979
12 7-17-10, as enacted by Chapter 124, Laws of Utah 1979
13 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
14 Section 1. Section 7-17-1 is amended to read:
15 7-17-1. Legislative intent.
16 [
17 provisions of this [
18 with respect to reserve accounts established before and after [
19 1979.
20 (2) This chapter may not be applied to a reserve account to the extent that the reserve
21 account is at issue in an action:
22 (a) that is filed before July 1, 1979; and
23 (b) for which, as of May 1, 2000, a final unappealable judgment or order has not been
24 issued by a court of competent jurisdiction.
25 Section 2. Section 7-17-10 is amended to read:
26 7-17-10. Applicability of chapter to accounts and actions thereon.
27 [
28 [
29 [
30 compensation for the use of the funds in any reserve account whether or not the reserve accounts
31 were established prior to or subsequent to July 1, 1979.
32 (2) (a) This chapter may not be applied to a reserve account to the extent that the reserve
33 account is at issue in an action:
34 (i) that is filed before July 1, 1979; and
35 (ii) for which, as of May 1, 2000, a final unappealable judgment or order has not been
36 issued by a court of competent jurisdiction.
37 (b) A person may not rely on this chapter in an action filed prior to July 1, 1979.
Legislative Review Note
as of 2-14-00 3:49 PM
This legislation raises the following constitutional or statutory concerns:
By prohibiting the application of statutes adopted in 1979 to pending cases filed before July 1,
1979, this bill may raise constitutional issues. For example, if the application of the amendments
is interpreted as affecting substantive rights, the bill might be challenged as improper retroactive
legislation. However, there a circumstances where courts have permitted retrospective application
of statute to clarify legislative intent or correct procedural errors. Also, principles of separations
of powers and special legislation limit a legislature's ability to affect pending judicial proceeds if
a court determines that the legislation is an attempt to intervene in a specific judicial proceeding.
If challenged, it would be for the courts to decide whether this bill constitutes a permitted
clarification of how the legislature intended the statutes to be applied.