Download Zipped Introduced WordPerfect HB0216S01.ZIP
[Status][Bill Documents][Fiscal Note][Bills Directory]
First Substitute H.B. 216
1
2
3
4
5
6 LONG TITLE
7 General Description:
8 This bill modifies provisions of the Commerce and Trade Code related to truth in
9 advertising.
10 Highlighted Provisions:
11 This bill:
12 . defines terms;
13 . requires an Internet business to:
14 . take reasonable steps to maintain a consumer's privacy; and
15 . provide a privacy notice to a consumer;
16 . prohibits an Internet business from making a false or misleading statement in a
17 privacy policy; and
18 . makes technical changes.
19 Monies Appropriated in this Bill:
20 None
21 Other Special Clauses:
22 None
23 Utah Code Sections Affected:
24 AMENDS:
25 13-11a-2, as enacted by Chapter 205, Laws of Utah 1989
26 13-11a-3, as enacted by Chapter 205, Laws of Utah 1989
27 ENACTS:
28 13-11a-3.5, Utah Code Annotated 1953
29
30 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
31 Section 1. Section 13-11a-2 is amended to read:
32 13-11a-2. Definitions.
33 As used in this chapter:
34 (1) "Advertisement" means any written, oral, or graphic statement or representation
35 made by a supplier in connection with the solicitation of business. It includes, but is not
36 limited to, communication by noncable television systems, radio, printed brochures,
37 newspapers, leaflets, flyers, circulars, billboards, banners, or signs. It does not include any
38 oral, in person, representation made by a sales representative to a prospective purchaser.
39 (2) To "clearly and conspicuously disclose" means:
40 (a) in the print media:
41 (i) to state in typeface that is sufficiently bold to be obviously seen;
42 (ii) to state in type size of at least 10 point type for a 14" x 23" document, and, in larger
43 documents, of a type size of proportionately the same size; and
44 (iii) to place in the text so as to be obviously seen;
45 (b) in radio advertising, to verbally state in the same volume as that used in the
46 advertisement;
47 (c) in television advertising, the method for print media or radio advertising is
48 acceptable unless contrary to other governing laws.
49 (3) (a) Except as provided in Subsection (3)(b), "consumer" means a resident of Utah
50 who:
51 (i) (A) enters into a contract with an Internet service provider for access to the Internet
52 for personal, family, or household purposes; and
53 (B) receives the access described in Subsection (3)(a)(i)(A); or
54 (ii) accesses a website operated by a website operator.
55 (b) "Consumer" does not include a person who resells the access described in
56 Subsection (3)(a)(i)(A).
57 [
58 descriptive name rather than under a trademark, trade name, brand name, house brand, or other
59 distinguishing appellation.
60 [
61 transaction.
62 (6) "Internet business" means:
63 (a) an Internet service provider; or
64 (b) a website operator.
65 (7) (a) Except as provided in Subsection (7)(b), "Internet service provider" means a
66 person who:
67 (i) provides a consumer:
68 (A) authenticated access to the Internet; or
69 (B) authenticated presence on the Internet; and
70 (ii) provides the access or presence described in Subsection (7)(a)(i) by providing
71 transit routing of Internet protocol packets for and on behalf of the consumer.
72 (b) "Internet service provider" does not include a person that offers on a common
73 carrier basis:
74 (i) access to telecommunications facilities; or
75 (ii) telecommunication services by means of telecommunications facilities.
76 (8) (a) "Personally identifiable information" means information that identifies:
77 (i) a consumer by:
78 (A) name; and
79 (B) (I) account number;
80 (II) physical address;
81 (III) email address;
82 (IV) telephone number;
83 (V) Social Security number;
84 (VI) credit card information; or
85 (VII) bank account information;
86 (ii) a consumer as having requested or obtained specific materials or services from an
87 Internet business;
88 (iii) an Internet site visited by a consumer; or
89 (iv) any of the contents of a consumer's data-storage device.
90 (b) "Personally identifiable information" does not include:
91 (i) information:
92 (A) in aggregate or summary form; and
93 (B) from which the identity of an individual consumer is not ascertainable; or
94 (ii) information;
95 (A) from which all information identifying an individual consumer has been removed;
96 and
97 (B) that cannot be combined with other information to identify an individual consumer.
98 (9) "Website operator" means a person who:
99 (a) (i) is domiciled in Utah; or
100 (ii) knowingly transacts business with residents of Utah;
101 (b) operates a website on the Internet for a commercial purpose; and
102 (c) collects or maintains personally identifiable information about a consumer.
103 [
104 offered at the time of the price assessment without a temporary store reduction in price.
105 [
106 government, or governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership,
107 unincorporated association, two or more of any of the foregoing having a joint or common
108 interest, or any other legal or commercial entity.
109 [
110 comparison.
111 [
112 including the reference prices, underlying the price comparison, or who makes the price
113 comparison.
114 [
115 reduction, or discount exists or will exist between the supplier's advertised price and another
116 specific price. A representation which does not reasonably imply a comparison to identifiable
117 prices or items does not express a price comparison. Language constituting mere sales
118 "puffing" is not prohibited by this chapter.
119 [
120 purchasers to whom the advertisement is aimed could reasonably be expected to seek the goods
121 or services in question.
122 [
123 lower price to indicate that a reduction in price exists or will exist.
124 [
125 goods or services for sale in good faith in the regular course of business. Every price
126 represented in an advertisement is considered a regular price unless it is specifically
127 represented as a price other than a regular price, such as a discount price or a manufacturer's
128 suggested price. It is prima facie evidence that a price is other than a regular price when it was
129 not offered as the nondiscount price of the goods or services for the 15 days immediately
130 preceding an advertisement of the price, and the price change during the 15 day period was not
131 due to price changes inherent in the pricing of seasonal or perishable goods, due to changes in
132 cost of the goods or services to the supplier, or due to pricing changes made to match a
133 competitor's price.
134 [
135 other written or oral transfer or disposition of goods, services, or other property, both tangible
136 and intangible (except securities and insurance), to a person or business, or a solicitation or
137 offer by a supplier with respect to any of these transfers or dispositions. It includes any offer or
138 solicitation, any agreement, and any performance of an agreement with respect to any of these
139 transfers or dispositions.
140 [
141 who regularly solicits, engages in, or enforces sales transactions, whether or not he deals
142 directly with the purchaser.
143 Section 2. Section 13-11a-3 is amended to read:
144 13-11a-3. Deceptive trade practices enumerated -- Records to be kept -- Defenses.
145 (1) Deceptive trade practices occur when, in the course of his business, vocation, or
146 occupation:
147 (a) A person passes off goods or services as those of another.
148 (b) A person causes likelihood of confusion or of misunderstanding as to the source,
149 sponsorship, approval, or certification of goods or services.
150 (c) A person causes likelihood of confusion or of misunderstanding as to affiliation,
151 connection, association with, or certification by another.
152 (d) A person uses deceptive representations or designations of geographic origin in
153 connection with goods or services.
154 (e) A person represents that goods or services have sponsorship, approval,
155 characteristics, ingredients, uses, benefits, or qualities that they do not have or that a person has
156 a sponsorship, approval, status, affiliation, or connection that he does not have.
157 (f) A person represents that goods are original or new if they are deteriorated, altered,
158 reconditioned, reclaimed, used, or second-hand.
159 (g) A person represents that goods or services are of a particular standard, quality, or
160 grade, or that goods are of a particular style or model, if they are of another.
161 (h) A person disparages the goods, services, or business of another by false or
162 misleading representation of fact.
163 (i) A person advertises goods or services or the price of goods and services with intent
164 not to sell them as advertised. If specific advertised prices will be in effect for less than one
165 week from the advertisement date, the advertisement must clearly and conspicuously disclose
166 the specific time period during which the prices will be in effect.
167 (j) A person advertises goods or services with intent not to supply a reasonable
168 expectable public demand, unless:
169 (i) the advertisement clearly and conspicuously discloses a limitation of quantity; or
170 (ii) the person issues rainchecks for the advertised goods or services.
171 (k) A person makes false or misleading statements of fact concerning the reasons for,
172 existence of, or amounts of price reductions.
173 (l) A person makes a comparison between his own sale or discount price and a
174 competitor's nondiscounted price without clearly and conspicuously disclosing that fact.
175 (m) A person, without clearly and conspicuously disclosing the date of the price
176 assessment makes a price comparison with the goods of another based upon a price assessment
177 performed more than seven days prior to the date of the advertisement or uses in an
178 advertisement the results of a price assessment performed more than seven days prior to the
179 date of the advertisement without disclosing, in a print ad, the date of the price assessment, or
180 in a radio or television ad, the time frame of the price assessment.
181 (n) A person advertises or uses in a price assessment or comparison a price that is not
182 his own unless this fact is:
183 (i) clearly and conspicuously disclosed; and
184 (ii) the representation of the price is accurate. With respect to the price of a
185 competitor, the price must be one at which the competitor offered the goods or services for sale
186 in the product area at the time of the price assessment, and must not be an isolated price.
187 (o) A person represents as independent an audit, accounting, price assessment, or
188 comparison of prices of goods or services, when such audit, accounting, price assessment, or
189 comparison is not independent. Such audit, accounting, price assessment, or comparison shall
190 be independent if the price assessor randomly selects the goods to be compared, and the time
191 and place of such comparison, and no agreement or understanding exists between the supplier
192 and the price assessor that could cause the results of the assessment to be fraudulent or
193 deceptive. The independence of such audit, accounting, or price comparison is not invalidated
194 merely because the advertiser pays a fee therefor, but is invalidated if the audit, accounting, or
195 price comparison is done by a full or part time employee of the advertiser.
196 (p) A person represents, in an advertisement of a reduction from the supplier's own
197 prices, that the reduction is from a regular price, when the former price is not a regular price as
198 defined in [
199 (q) A person advertises a price comparison or the result of a price assessment or
200 comparison that uses, in any way, an identified competitor's price without clearly and
201 conspicuously disclosing the identity of the price assessor and any relationship between the
202 price assessor and the supplier. Examples of disclosure complying with this section are: "Price
203 assessment performed by Store Z"; "Price assessment performed by a certified public
204 accounting firm"; "Price assessment performed by employee of Store Y."
205 (r) A person makes a price comparison between a category of the supplier's goods and
206 the same category of the goods of another, without randomly selecting the individual goods or
207 services upon whose prices the comparison is based. For the purposes of this subsection,
208 goods or services are randomly selected when the supplier has no advance knowledge of what
209 goods and services will be surveyed by the price assessor, and when the supplier certifies its
210 lack of advance knowledge by an affidavit to be retained in the supplier's records for one year.
211 (s) A person makes a comparison between similar but nonidentical goods or services
212 unless the nonidentical goods or services are of essentially similar quality to the advertised
213 goods or services or the dissimilar aspects are clearly and conspicuously disclosed in the
214 advertisements. It is prima facie evidence of compliance with this subsection if:
215 (i) the goods compared are substantially the same size; and
216 (ii) the goods compared are of substantially the same quality, which may include
217 similar models of competing brands of goods, or goods made of substantially the same
218 materials and made with substantially the same workmanship. It is prima facie evidence of
219 a deceptive comparison under this section when the prices of brand name goods and generic
220 goods are compared.
221 (t) A person engages in any other conduct which similarly creates a likelihood of
222 confusion or of misunderstanding.
223 (2) Any supplier who makes a comparison with a competitor's price in advertising shall
224 maintain for a period of one year records that disclose the factual basis for such price
225 comparisons and from which the validity of such claim can be established.
226 (3) It shall be a defense to any claim of false or deceptive price representations under
227 this chapter that a person:
228 (a) has no knowledge that the represented price is not genuine; and
229 (b) has made reasonable efforts to determine whether the represented price is genuine.
230 (4) Subsections (1) (m) and (q) do not apply to price comparisons made in catalogs in
231 which a supplier compares the price of a single item of its goods or services with those of
232 another.
233 (5) In order to prevail in an action under this chapter, a complainant need not prove
234 competition between the parties or actual confusion or misunderstanding.
235 (6) This chapter does not affect unfair trade practices otherwise actionable at common
236 law or under other statutes of this state.
237 Section 3. Section 13-11a-3.5 is enacted to read:
238 13-11a-3.5. Internet business security and privacy notices.
239 (1) An Internet business:
240 (a) shall take reasonable steps to maintain the security and privacy of a consumer's
241 personally identifiable information;
242 (b) shall provide consumers notice of:
243 (i) the privacy policy of the Internet business; and
244 (ii) the services provided by the Internet business that allow a consumer to increase the
245 privacy of the consumer's personally identifiable information; and
246 (c) may not make a false or misleading statement in a privacy policy, published on the
247 Internet or otherwise distributed or published, regarding the use of personally identifiable
248 information.
249 (2) The notice required by Subsection (1)(b):
250 (a) shall be:
251 (i) clearly and conspicuously disclosed; and
252 (ii) written so that a consumer without technical knowledge of the Internet can
253 understand the notice; and
254 (b) may provide a consumer the option to:
255 (i) allow disclosure of the consumer's personally identifiable information; or
256 (ii) prohibit disclosure of the consumer's personally identifiable information.
Legislative Review Note
as of 2-16-04 10:38 AM
This bill regulates Internet businesses who provide services to Utah residents. Case law
surrounding regulation of Internet activities is evolving. State regulations of Internet activities
have been challenged for violating principles such as the Commerce Clause of the United
States Constitution. Some courts have indicated that the need for national uniformity might
limit a state's ability to regulate Internet activities. Other court rulings indicate that regulations
like those contained in this bill could be upheld because the regulations do not impose a greater
burden on out of state Internet businesses than is imposed on in state Internet businesses and
regulate only service that is provided to Utah residents.