Download Zipped Introduced WordPerfect SB0010S01.ZIP
[Status][Bill Documents][Fiscal Note][Bills Directory]

First Substitute S.B. 10

Senator Gregory S. Bell proposes the following substitute bill:


             1     
LIABILITY REFORM ACT AMENDMENTS

             2     
2005 GENERAL SESSION

             3     
STATE OF UTAH

             4     
Sponsor: Gregory S. Bell

             5     
             6      LONG TITLE
             7      General Description:
             8          This bill specifies conditions for allocating fault to nonparties in a lawsuit.
             9      Highlighted Provisions:
             10          This bill:
             11          .    provides for a reasonable time to designate nonparties to whom fault may be
             12      allocated;
             13          .    requires that a party who makes a request to the court to allocate fault to nonparties
             14      to provide specific information about the nonparties; and
             15          .    allows the court to deny the request if specific provisions are not complied with.
             16      Monies Appropriated in this Bill:
             17          None
             18      Other Special Clauses:
             19          None
             20      Utah Code Sections Affected:
             21      AMENDS:
             22          78-27-38, as last amended by Chapter 95, Laws of Utah 1999
             23          78-27-39, as last amended by Chapter 95, Laws of Utah 1999
             24          78-27-41, as last amended by Chapter 95, Laws of Utah 1999
             25     


             26      Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
             27          Section 1. Section 78-27-38 is amended to read:
             28           78-27-38. Comparative negligence.
             29          (1) The fault of a person seeking recovery [shall] may not alone bar recovery by that
             30      person.
             31          (2) A person seeking recovery may recover from any defendant or group of defendants
             32      whose fault, combined with the fault of persons immune from suit and nonparties to whom
             33      fault is allocated, exceeds the fault of the person seeking recovery prior to any reallocation of
             34      fault made under Subsection 78-27-39 (2).
             35          (3) No defendant is liable to any person seeking recovery for any amount in excess of
             36      the proportion of fault attributed to that defendant under Section 78-27-39 .
             37          (4) (a) [In determining the proportionate fault attributable to each defendant, the] The
             38      fact finder may, and when requested by a party shall, [consider the conduct of any person who
             39      contributed to the alleged injury regardless of whether the person is a person immune from suit
             40      or a defendant in the action and may allocate fault] allocate the percentage or proportion of
             41      fault attributable to each person seeking recovery, to each defendant, to any person immune
             42      from suit, and to any other person [whether joined as a party to the action or not and whose
             43      identity is known or unknown to the parties to the action, including a person immune from suit
             44      who contributed to the alleged injury] identified under Subsection 78-27-41 (4) for whom there
             45      is a factual and legal basis to allocate fault. In the case of a motor vehicle accident involving
             46      an unidentified motor vehicle, the existence of the vehicle shall be proven by clear and
             47      convincing evidence which may consist solely of one person's testimony.
             48          (b) Any fault allocated to a person immune from suit is considered only to accurately
             49      determine the fault of the person seeking recovery and a defendant and may not subject the
             50      person immune from suit to any liability, based on the allocation of fault, in this or any other
             51      action.
             52          Section 2. Section 78-27-39 is amended to read:
             53           78-27-39. Separate special verdicts on total damages and proportion of fault.
             54          (1) The trial court may, and when requested by any party shall, direct the jury, if any, to
             55      find separate special verdicts determining the total amount of damages sustained and the
             56      percentage or proportion of fault attributable to each person seeking recovery, to each


             57      defendant, to any person immune from suit, and to any other person [whether joined as a party
             58      to the action or not and whose identity is known or unknown to the parties to the action,
             59      including a person immune from suit who contributed to the alleged injury] identified under
             60      Subsection 78-27-41 (4) for whom there is a factual and legal basis to allocate fault.
             61          (2) (a) If the combined percentage or proportion of fault attributed to all persons
             62      immune from suit is less than 40%, the trial court shall reduce that percentage or proportion of
             63      fault to zero and reallocate that percentage or proportion of fault to the other parties and those
             64      identified under Subsection 78-27-41 (4) for whom there is a factual and legal basis to allocate
             65      fault in proportion to the percentage or proportion of fault initially attributed to each [party] by
             66      the fact finder. After this reallocation, cumulative fault shall equal 100% with the persons
             67      immune from suit being allocated no fault.
             68          (b) If the combined percentage or proportion of fault attributed to all persons immune
             69      from suit is 40% or more, that percentage or proportion of fault attributed to persons immune
             70      from suit may not be reduced under Subsection (2)(a).
             71          (c) (i) The jury may not be advised of the effect of any reallocation under Subsection
             72      (2).
             73          (ii) The jury may be advised that fault attributed to persons immune from suit may
             74      reduce the award of the person seeking recovery.
             75          (3) A person immune from suit may not be held liable, based on the allocation of fault,
             76      in this or any other action.
             77          Section 3. Section 78-27-41 is amended to read:
             78           78-27-41. Joinder of defendants.
             79          (1) A person seeking recovery, or any defendant who is a party to the litigation, may
             80      join as a defendant, in accordance with the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure, any person other
             81      than a person immune from suit [who may] alleged to have caused or contributed to the injury
             82      or damage for which recovery is sought, for the purpose of having determined their respective
             83      proportions of fault.
             84          (2) A person immune from suit may not be named as a defendant, but fault may be
             85      allocated to a person immune from suit solely for the purpose of accurately determining the
             86      fault of the person seeking recovery and [a defendant] all defendants. A person immune from
             87      suit is not subject to any liability, based on the allocation of fault, in this or any other action.


             88          (3) (a) A person immune from suit may intervene as a party under Rule 24, Utah Rules
             89      of Civil Procedure, regardless of whether or not money damages are sought.
             90          (b) A person immune from suit who intervenes in an action may not be held liable for
             91      any fault allocated to that person under Section 78-27-38 .
             92          [(4) A party seeking to allocate fault shall identify in its answer those persons then
             93      known to that party who may be at fault and shall identify within a reasonable time any
             94      additional persons later discovered to have been at fault.]
             95          (4) Fault may not be allocated to a non-party unless a party timely files a description of
             96      the factual and legal basis on which fault can be allocated and information identifying the
             97      non-party, to the extent known or reasonably available to the party, including name, address,
             98      telephone number and employer. The party shall file the description and identifying
             99      information in accordance with Rule 9, Utah Rules of Civil Procedure or as ordered by the
             100      court but in no event later than 90 days before trial as provided in Rule 9, Utah Rules of Civil
             101      Procedure.


[Bill Documents][Bills Directory]