Download Zipped Introduced WordPerfect HJR007.ZIP
[Status][Bill Documents][Fiscal Note][Bills Directory]

H.J.R. 7

             1     

RESOLUTION OPPOSING UNITED STATES

             2     
SUPREME COURT'S PORNOGRAPHY

             3     
DECISION

             4     
2006 GENERAL SESSION

             5     
STATE OF UTAH

             6     
Chief Sponsor: Ron Bigelow

             7     
Senate Sponsor: Michael G. Waddoups

             8     
             9      LONG TITLE
             10      General Description:
             11          This joint resolution of the Legislature expresses opposition to a recent decision of the
             12      United States Supreme Court regarding pornography and urges Congress to pass a
             13      constitutional amendment to protect children from accessing pornography.
             14      Highlighted Provisions:
             15          This resolution:
             16          .    expresses opposition to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Ashcroft v.
             17      American Civil Liberties Union, 124 S. Ct. 2783, 159 L. Ed. 2d 690, regarding
             18      protecting minors from exposure to pornography; and
             19          .    urges the United States Congress to pass a constitutional amendment protecting
             20      children from accessing pornography.
             21      Special Clauses:
             22          None
             23     
             24      Be it resolved by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
             25          WHEREAS, in Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties Union, 124 S. Ct. 2783, 159 L.
             26      Ed. 2d 690, plaintiffs challenged the content-based speech restrictions of the Child Online
             27      Protection Act (COPA), which was designed to protect minors from exposure to pornography


             28      on the World Wide Web;
             29          WHEREAS, in that case, the United States Supreme Court invoked a requirement that,
             30      in order to prevail in a court challenge, the federal government must demonstrate that less
             31      restrictive methods of protecting minors from pornography are not as effective as current law;
             32          WHEREAS, in that case, the United States Supreme Court held that the federal
             33      government failed to meet the burden of proving that proposed alternatives such as filtering
             34      software, a plausible less restrictive alternative to COPA, would be less effective in protecting
             35      minors from exposure to pornography on the Internet;
             36          WHEREAS, child pornography has become a $3 billion annual industry;
             37          WHEREAS, the United States Customs Service estimates that there are more than
             38      100,000 websites offering child pornography, which is illegal worldwide;
             39          WHEREAS, these unlawful sexual images can be purchased very easily at these
             40      websites;
             41          WHEREAS, more than 20,000 images of child pornography are posted on the Internet
             42      every week;
             43          WHEREAS, one in five children who use computer chat rooms has been approached
             44      over the Internet by pedophiles;
             45          WHEREAS, in 2002, the United States Supreme Court stated in another case that
             46      virtual pornographic images of children are a victimless crime;
             47          WHEREAS, in many instances it is impossible for a viewer to determine whether an
             48      image is a virtual or an actual photographic image;
             49          WHEREAS, the determination of whether the material is "harmful to minors" was
             50      intended by the United States Supreme Court to be made by lawfully appointed juries made up
             51      of, in the Court's own words, "average person[s], applying contemporary community standards,
             52      would find, taking the material as a whole and with respect to minors, is designed to appeal to,
             53      or is designed to pander to, the prurient interest" and "taken as a whole, lack serious literary,
             54      artistic, political, or scientific value for minors";
             55          WHEREAS, the United States Congress should take deliberate action to protect minors
             56      through the passage of a constitutional amendment protecting minors from exposure to
             57      pornography; and
             58          WHEREAS, governments and the courts must respond decisively when minors are


             59      exposed to material that is harmful to them, in the name of preserving the free speech right of
             60      adults:
             61          NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Legislature of the state of Utah
             62      expresses opposition to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Ashcroft v. American
             63      Civil Liberties Union, 124 S. Ct. 2783, 159 L. Ed. 2d 690, and other recent cases that claim to
             64      preserve the free speech rights of adults while exposing minors to material the United States
             65      Supreme Court has stated is "harmful to minors."
             66          BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Legislature of the state of Utah strongly urges
             67      the United States Congress to pass a constitutional amendment to protect minors from
             68      pornography and criminalize the possession of pornographic images of children in any form.
             69          BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be sent to the Majority
             70      Leader of the United States Senate, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives,
             71      the United States Supreme Court, and to the members of Utah's congressional delegation.




Legislative Review Note
    as of 1-6-06 9:49 AM


Based on a limited legal review, this legislation has not been determined to have a high
probability of being held unconstitutional.

Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel


[Bill Documents][Bills Directory]