Download Zipped Amended WordPerfect SB0277.ZIP
[Introduced][Status][Bill Documents][Fiscal Note][Bills Directory]

S.B. 277

This document includes Senate Committee Amendments incorporated into the bill on Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:10 AM by rday. -->              1     

POST-CONVICTION REMEDIES ACT

             2     
REVISIONS

             3     
2008 GENERAL SESSION

             4     
STATE OF UTAH

             5     
Chief Sponsor: Gregory S. Bell

             6     
House Sponsor: Stephen H. Urquhart

             7     

             8      LONG TITLE
             9      General Description:
             10          This bill amends the Post-Conviction Remedies Act.
             11      Highlighted Provisions:
             12          This bill:
             13          .    establishes procedures and requirements for post-conviction actions by a person
             14      convicted of a criminal offense.
             15      Monies Appropriated in this Bill:
             16          None
             17      Other Special Clauses:
             18          None
             19      Utah Code Sections Affected:
             20      AMENDS:
             21          78B-9-101, as renumbered and amended by Laws of Utah 2008, Chapter 3
             22          78B-9-102, as renumbered and amended by Laws of Utah 2008, Chapter 3
             23          78B-9-104, as renumbered and amended by Laws of Utah 2008, Chapter 3
             24          78B-9-105, as renumbered and amended by Laws of Utah 2008, Chapter 3
             25          78B-9-106, as renumbered and amended by Laws of Utah 2008, Chapter 3
             26          78B-9-107, as renumbered and amended by Laws of Utah 2008, Chapter 3
             27          78B-9-108, as renumbered and amended by Laws of Utah 2008, Chapter 3



Text Box

- 2 -
             28
         78B-9-109, as renumbered and amended by Laws of Utah 2008, Chapter 3
             29          78B-9-202, as renumbered and amended by Laws of Utah 2008, Chapter 3
             30     

             31      Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
             32          Section 1. Section 78B-9-101 is amended to read:
             33           78B-9-101. Title.
             34          This [act shall be] chapter is known as the "Post-Conviction Remedies Act."
             35          Section 2. Section 78B-9-102 is amended to read:
             36           78B-9-102. Replacement of prior remedies.
             37          (1) This chapter establishes [a substantive legal] the sole remedy for any person who
             38      challenges a conviction or sentence for a criminal offense and who has exhausted all other legal
             39      remedies, including a direct appeal except as provided in Subsection (2). This chapter replaces
             40      all prior remedies for review, including extraordinary or common law writs. Proceedings under
             41      this chapter are civil and are governed by the rules of civil procedure. Procedural provisions
             42      for filing and commencement of a petition are found in Rule 65C, Utah Rules of Civil
             43      Procedure.
             44          (2) This chapter does not apply to:
             45          (a) habeas corpus petitions that do not challenge a conviction or sentence for a criminal
             46      offense;
             47          (b) motions to correct a sentence pursuant to Rule 22(e), Utah Rules of Criminal
             48      Procedure; or
             49          (c) actions taken by the Board of Pardons and Parole.
             50          Section 3. Section 78B-9-104 is amended to read:
             51           78B-9-104. Grounds for relief -- Retroactivity of rule.
             52          (1) Unless precluded by Section 78B-9-106 or 78B-9-107 , a person who has been
             53      convicted and sentenced for a criminal offense may file an action in the district court of
             54      original jurisdiction for post-conviction relief to vacate or modify the conviction or sentence
             55      upon the following grounds:
             56          (a) the conviction was obtained or the sentence was imposed in violation of the United
             57      States Constitution or Utah Constitution;
             58          (b) the conviction was obtained or the sentence was imposed under a statute that is in



Text Box

- 3 -
             59
     violation of the United States Constitution or Utah Constitution, or the conduct for which the
             60      petitioner was prosecuted is constitutionally protected;
             61          (c) the sentence was imposed [in an unlawful manner,] or probation was revoked in [an
             62      unlawful manner] violation of the controlling statutory provisions;
             63          (d) the petitioner had ineffective assistance of counsel in violation of the United States
             64      Constitution or Utah Constitution; [or]
             65          (e) newly discovered material evidence exists that requires the court to vacate the
             66      conviction or sentence, because:
             67          (i) neither the petitioner nor petitioner's counsel knew of the evidence at the time of
             68      trial or sentencing or in time to include the evidence in any previously filed post-trial motion or
             69      post-conviction proceeding, and the evidence could not have been discovered through the
             70      exercise of reasonable diligence;
             71          (ii) the material evidence is not merely cumulative of evidence that was known;
             72          (iii) the material evidence is not merely impeachment evidence; and
             73          (iv) viewed with all the other evidence, the newly discovered material evidence
             74      demonstrates that no reasonable trier of fact could have found the petitioner guilty of the
             75      offense or subject to the sentence received[.]; or
             76          [(2) The question of whether a petitioner is entitled to the benefit of a rule announced
             77      by the United States Supreme Court, Utah Supreme Court, or Utah Court of Appeals after the
             78      petitioner's conviction became final shall be governed by applicable state and federal principles
             79      of retroactivity.]
             80          (f) the petitioner can prove entitlement to relief under a rule announced by the United
             81      States Supreme Court, the Utah Supreme Court, or the Utah Court of Appeals after conviction
             82      and sentence became final on direct appeal, and that:
             83          (i) the rule was dictated by precedent existing at the time the petitioner's conviction or
             84      sentence became final; or
             85          (ii) the rule decriminalizes the conduct that comprises the elements of the crime for
             86      which the petitioner was convicted.
             87          (2) The court may not grant relief from a conviction or sentence unless the petitioner
             88      establishes that there would be a reasonable likelihood of a more favorable outcome in light of
             89      the facts proved in the post-conviction proceeding, viewed with the evidence and facts



Text Box

- 4 -
Senate Committee Amendments 2-25-2008 rd/ecm
             90
     introduced at trial or during sentencing.
             91          (3) The court may not grant relief from a conviction based on a claim that the petitioner
             92      is innocent of the crime for which convicted except as provided in Title 78B, Chapter 9, Part 3,
             93      Postconviction Testing of DNA , or Part 4, Post-Conviction Determination of Factual
             94      Innocence.
             95          Section 4. Section 78B-9-105 is amended to read:
             96           78B-9-105. Burden of proof.
             97          (1) The petitioner has the burden of pleading and proving by a preponderance of the
             98      evidence the facts necessary to entitle the petitioner to relief.
             99           S. [ (2) The court may not enter a default judgment against the state. ] .S The court may not
             100      grant relief without determining that the petitioner is entitled to relief under the provisions of
             101      this chapter and in light of the entire record, including the record from the criminal case under
             102      review.
             103           S. [(3)] (2) .S The respondent has the burden of pleading any ground of preclusion under Section
             104      78B-9-106 , but once a ground has been pled, the petitioner has the burden to disprove its
             105      existence by a preponderance of the evidence.
             106          Section 5. Section 78B-9-106 is amended to read:
             107           78B-9-106. Preclusion of relief -- Exception.
             108          (1) A person is not eligible for relief under this chapter upon any ground that:
             109          (a) may still be raised on direct appeal or by a post-trial motion;
             110          (b) was raised or addressed at trial or on appeal;
             111          (c) could have been but was not raised at trial or on appeal;
             112          (d) was raised or addressed in any previous request for post-conviction relief or could
             113      have been, but was not, raised in a previous request for post-conviction relief; or
             114          (e) is barred by the limitation period established in Section 78B-9-107 .
             115           S. [ (2) A time bar or procedural bar may be waived by the state only in a written waiver
             116      filed in the action and served on the petitioner.
] .S
The state may raise any of the procedural bars
             117      or time bar at any time, including during the state's appeal from an order granting
             118      post-conviction relief S. , unless the court determines that the state should have raised the
             118a      time bar or procedural bar at an earlier time. .S . Any court may raise a procedural bar or time
             118b      bar on its own motion,
             119      provided that it gives the parties notice and an opportunity to be heard.
             120          [(2)] (3) Notwithstanding Subsection (1)(c), a person may be eligible for relief on a



Text Box

- 5 -
             121
     basis that the ground could have been but was not raised at trial or on appeal, if the failure to
             122      raise that ground was due to ineffective assistance of counsel.
             123          Section 6. Section 78B-9-107 is amended to read:
             124           78B-9-107. Statute of limitations for postconviction relief.
             125          (1) A petitioner is entitled to relief only if the petition is filed within one year after the
             126      cause of action has accrued.
             127          (2) For purposes of this section, the cause of action accrues on the latest of the
             128      following dates:
             129          (a) the last day for filing an appeal from the entry of the final judgment of conviction, if
             130      no appeal is taken;
             131          (b) the entry of the decision of the appellate court which has jurisdiction over the case,
             132      if an appeal is taken;
             133          (c) the last day for filing a petition for writ of certiorari in the Utah Supreme Court or
             134      the United States Supreme Court, if no petition for writ of certiorari is filed;
             135          (d) the entry of the denial of the petition for writ of certiorari or the entry of the
             136      decision on the petition for certiorari review, if a petition for writ of certiorari is filed; [or]
             137          (e) the date on which petitioner knew or should have known, in the exercise of
             138      reasonable diligence, of evidentiary facts on which the petition is based[.]; or
             139          [(3) If the court finds that the interests of justice require, a court may excuse a
             140      petitioner's failure to file within the time limitations.]
             141          (f) the date on which the new rule described in Subsection 78B-9-104 (1)(f) is
             142      established.
             143          (3) The limitations period is tolled for any period during which the petitioner was
             144      prevented from filing a petition due to state action in violation of the United States
             145      Constitution, or due to physical or mental incapacity. The petitioner has the burden of proving
             146      by a preponderance of the evidence that the petitioner is entitled to relief under this Subsection
             147      (3).
             148          (4) Sections 77-19-8 , 78B-2-104 , and 78B-2-111 do not extend the limitations period
             149      established in this section.
             150          Section 7. Section 78B-9-108 is amended to read:
             151           78B-9-108. Effect of granting relief -- Notice.



Text Box

- 6 -
             152
         (1) If the court grants the petitioner's request for relief, it shall either:
             153          (a) modify the original conviction or sentence; or
             154          (b) vacate the original conviction or sentence and order a new trial or sentencing
             155      proceeding as appropriate.
             156          (2) (a) If the petitioner is serving a felony sentence, the order shall be stayed for five
             157      days. Within the stay period, the respondent shall give written notice to the court and the
             158      petitioner that the respondent will pursue a new trial or sentencing proceedings, appeal the
             159      order, or take no action.
             160          (b) If the respondent fails to provide notice or gives notice at any time during the stay
             161      period that it intends to take no action, the court shall lift the stay and deliver the order to the
             162      custodian of the petitioner.
             163          (c) If the respondent gives notice of intent to appeal the court's decision, the stay
             164      provided for by Subsection (2)(a) shall remain in effect until the appeal concludes, including
             165      any petitions for rehearing or for discretionary review by a higher court. The court may lift the
             166      stay if the petitioner can make the showing required for a certificate of probable cause under
             167      Section 77-20-10 and URCP 27.
             168          [(c)] (d) If the respondent gives notice that it intends to retry or resentence the
             169      petitioner, the trial court may order any supplementary orders as to arraignment, trial,
             170      sentencing, custody, bail, discharge, or other matters that may be necessary.
             171          Section 8. Section 78B-9-109 is amended to read:
             172           78B-9-109. Appointment of pro bono counsel.
             173          (1) If any portion of the petition is not summarily dismissed, the court may, upon the
             174      request of an indigent petitioner, appoint counsel on a pro bono basis to represent the petitioner
             175      in the post-conviction court or on post-conviction appeal. Counsel who represented the
             176      petitioner at trial or on the direct appeal may not be appointed to represent the petitioner under
             177      this section.
             178          (2) In determining whether to appoint counsel, the court shall consider the following
             179      factors:
             180          (a) whether the petition or the appeal contains factual allegations that will require an
             181      evidentiary hearing; and
             182          (b) whether the petition involves complicated issues of law or fact that require the



Text Box

- 7 -
             183
     assistance of counsel for proper adjudication.
             184          (3) An allegation that counsel appointed under this section was ineffective cannot be
             185      the basis for relief in any subsequent post-conviction petition.
             186          Section 9. Section 78B-9-202 is amended to read:
             187           78B-9-202. Appointment and payment of counsel in death penalty cases.
             188          (1) A person who has been sentenced to death and whose conviction and sentence has
             189      been affirmed on appeal shall be advised in open court, on the record, in a hearing scheduled
             190      no less than 30 days prior to the signing of the death warrant, of the provisions of this chapter
             191      allowing challenges to the conviction and death sentence and the appointment of counsel for
             192      indigent [defendants] petitioners.
             193          (2) (a) If a [defendant] petitioner requests the court to appoint counsel, the court shall
             194      determine whether the [defendant] petitioner is indigent and make findings on the record
             195      regarding the [defendant's] petitioner's indigency. If the court finds that the [defendant]
             196      petitioner is indigent, it shall, subject to the provisions of Subsection (5), promptly appoint
             197      counsel who is qualified to represent [defendants in] petitioners in post-conviction death
             198      penalty cases as required by Rule 8 of the Utah Rules of Criminal Procedure. Counsel who
             199      represented the petitioner at trial or on the direct appeal may not be appointed to represent the
             200      petitioner under this section.
             201          (b) A [defendant] petitioner who wishes to reject the offer of counsel shall be advised
             202      on the record by the court of the consequences of the rejection before the court may accept the
             203      rejection.
             204          [(c) Costs of counsel and other reasonable]
             205          (3) Attorney fees and litigation expenses incurred in providing the representation
             206      provided for in this section and that the court has determined are reasonable shall be paid from
             207      state funds by the Division of Finance according to rules established pursuant to Title 63,
             208      Chapter 46a, Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act.
             209          (a) In determining whether the requested funds are reasonable, the court should
             210      consider:
             211          (i) the extent to which the petitioner requests funds to investigate and develop evidence
             212      and legal arguments that duplicate the evidence presented and arguments raised in the criminal
             213      proceeding; and



Text Box

- 8 -
Senate Committee Amendments 2-25-2008 rd/ecm
             214
         (ii) whether the petitioner has established that the requested funds are necessary to
             215      develop evidence and legal arguments that are reasonably likely to support post-conviction
             216      relief.
             217          (b) The court may authorize payment of attorney fees at a rate of $125 per hour up to a
             218      maximum of $60,000. The court may exceed the maximum only upon a showing of good
             219      cause as established in Subsections (3)(e) and (f).
             220          (c) The court may authorize litigation expenses up to a maximum of $20,000. The
             221      court may exceed the maximum only upon a showing of good cause as established in
             222      Subsections (3)(e) and (f).
             223          (d) The court may authorize the petitioner to apply ex parte for the funds permitted in
             224      Subsections (3)(b) and (c) upon a motion to proceed ex parte and if the petitioner establishes
             225      the need for confidentiality. The motion to proceed ex parte must be served on counsel
             226      representing the state, and the court may not grant the motion without giving the state an
             227      opportunity to respond.
             228          (e) In determining whether good cause exists to exceed the maximum sums established
             229      in Subsections (3)(b) and (c), the court shall consider:
             230          (i) the extent to which the work done to date and the further work identified by the
             231      petitioner duplicates work and investigation performed during the criminal case under review;
             232      and
             233          (ii) whether the petitioner has established that the work done to date and the further
             234      work identified is reasonably likely to develop evidence or legal arguments that will S. [ entitle the
             235      petitioner to
] support .S
post-conviction relief.
             236          (f) The court may permit payment in excess of the maximum amounts established in
             237      Subsections (3)(b) and (c) only on the petitioner's motion, provided that:
             238          (i) if the court has granted a motion to file ex parte applications under Subsection
             239      (3)(d), the petitioner shall serve the motion to exceed the maximum amounts on an assistant
             240      attorney general employed in a division other than the one in which the attorney is employed
             241      who represents the state in the post-conviction case; if the court has not granted a motion to file
             242      ex parte applications, then the petitioner must serve the attorney representing the state in the
             243      post-conviction matter with the motion to exceed the maximum funds;
             244          (ii) if the motion proceeds under Subsection (3)(f)(i), the designated assistant attorney



Text Box

- 9 -
             245
     general may not disclose to the attorney representing the state in the post-conviction matter any
             246      material the petitioner provides in support of the motion except upon a determination by the
             247      court that the material is not protected by or that the petitioner has waived the attorney client
             248      privilege or work product doctrine; and
             249          (iii) the court gives the state an opportunity to respond to the request for funds in
             250      excess of the maximum amounts provided in Subsections (3)(b) and (c).
             251          (4) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as creating the right to the effective
             252      assistance of post-conviction counsel, and relief may not be granted on any claim that
             253      post-conviction counsel was ineffective.
             254          (5) If within 60 days of the request for counsel the court cannot find counsel willing to
             255      accept the appointment, the court shall notify the petitioner and the state's counsel in writing.
             256      In that event, the petitioner may elect to proceed pro se by serving written notice of that
             257      election on the court and state's counsel within 30 days of the court's notice that no counsel
             258      could be found. If within 30 days of its notice to the petitioner the court receives no notice that
             259      the petitioner elects to proceed pro se, the court shall dismiss any pending post-conviction
             260      actions and vacate any execution stays, and the state may initiate proceedings under Section
             261      77-19-9 to issue an execution warrant.





Legislative Review Note
    as of 2-12-08 12:36 PM


Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel


[Bill Documents][Bills Directory]