1st Sub.
H.B.
176
COUNTY LAND USE PLANS
Senate Floor
Amendments
Amendment 2 February 29, 2012 3:26 PM
Senator David P. Hinkins proposes the following amendments:
1. Page 3, Lines 79 through 80
House Floor Amendments
2-27-2012 :
79 (14) "Proposed congressional land use legislation" means
a
draft
or a working document
of
congressional
80 legislation prepared by a person that includes a federal land use designation.
2. Page 11, Lines 317 through 319 :
317 63J-8-106. County supported federal land use designation proposed in
proposed
318 congressional land use legislation -- Process for legislative review of proposed federal
legislation
319 land use within a county.
3. Page 12, Line 336 :
336 (a) a
{
draft
}
copy
of the proposed congressional land use legislation;
4. Page 14, Lines 405a through 407
House Floor Amendments
2-27-2012 :
405a (u) a statement explaining whether and to what extent members of Utah's congressional
405b delegation and their staff were consulted in
{
drafting
}
preparing
the proposed congressional land
use
405c legislation and the federal land use designation contained therein. .H
406 (4) (a) No later than
{
90
}
60
days before delivering a report and draft concurrent resolution
407 in accordance with Subsection (2), a county shall contact and inform the office of the county's
5. Page 15, Lines 431 through 439 :
431 (ii) if the draft concurrent resolution is presented to the committee, consider whether to
432 approve
{
,
}
or
reject
{
, or recommend modifications to
}
the draft concurrent resolution;
{
and
}
(iii) if the draft concurrent resolution is rejected, provide direction to the county as to the
reasons the resolution was rejected and the actions that the county might take to secure committee
approval of the resolution; and
433
{
(iii)
}
(iv)
take any additional action the committee finds necessary.
434 (b) A legislative committee may not accept for review a county-supported federal land
435 use designation contained in proposed congressional land use legislation that does not meet the
436 requirements of this section.
(8)(a) If the committee rejects the draft concurrent resolution, a county may resubmit a revised
report and draft concurrent resolution to the office in accordance with the terms of this section.
(b) Upon receipt of a revised report and draft concurrent resolution, the office shall comply with the procedures set forth in this section.
(c) Upon receipt of a revised report, evaluation, and draft concurrent resolution by the office, a committee described in Subsection (6) shall comply with the procedures set forth in this section.
437
{
(8)
}
(9)
The governor may call a special session to consider the concurrent resolution
438 presented to and approved by a committee described in Subsection (7)(a).
439
{
(9)
}
(10)
If a concurrent resolution described in this section is adopted by the Legislature and
Page 1 of 2
LRGC victoriaashby victoriaashby U 02/29/12 2:50p