H.B.
310
STATE AND POLITICAL SUBDIVISION EMPLOYMENT AMENDMENTS
House Committee
Amendments
Amendment 1 February 14, 2012 12:02 PM
Representative Brad J. Galvez proposes the following amendments:
1. Page 1, Lines 10 through 12 :
10 This bill prohibits a state or political subdivision from considering seniority as
{
a
11 primary }
the sole
factor when determining whether to terminate an employee while conducting a
12 reduction in force.
2. Page 1, Lines 15 through 17 :
15 . prohibits the following from considering or establishing a policy requiring
16 consideration of seniority as
{
a primary
}
the sole
factor when determining whether to
17 terminate an employee while conducting a reduction in force:
3. Page 2, Lines 54 through 58 :
54 10-3-1014. Seniority as
{
primary
}
sole
factor prohibited when conducting reductions in
55 force.
56 A civil service commission may not make a rule or regulation requiring that a
57 department head conducting a reduction in force consider seniority as
{
a primary
}
the sole
factor
when
58 determining whether to terminate an employee.
4. Page 3, Lines 84 through 85 :
84 (b) While conducting a reduction in force, a municipality may not consider seniority as
85
{
a primary
}
the sole
factor when determining whether to terminate an employee.
5. Page 4, Lines 105 through 106 :
105 (8) provision of a reduction in force policy that does not consider seniority as
{
a primary
}
the
sole
106 factor when determining whether to terminate an employee.
6. Page 5, Lines 127 through 135 :
127 17-30-16. Reductions in force -- Seniority may not be
{
primary
}
sole
factor --
128 Reemployment register.
129 (1) When necessary because of lack of funds or work [
130 authority, with the approval of the commission, [
131 [
132
133 (2) While conducting a reduction in force, an appointing authority or the merit system
134 commission may not consider seniority as
{
a primary
}
the sole
factor when determining whether to
135 terminate an officer.
7. Page 9, Lines 260 through 261 :
260 (c) A county conducting a reduction in force may not consider seniority as
{
a primary
}
the
sole
261 factor when determining whether to terminate an employee.
8. Page 10, Lines 281 through 283 :
281 (2) Except as provided in Section 17B-2a-813 , a local district conducting a reduction in
282 force may not consider seniority as
{
a primary
}
the sole
factor when determining whether to
terminate an
283 employee.
9. Page 10, Lines 301 through 303 :
301 (c) An institution president or board of trustees may not establish a policy that requires
302 an institution conducting a reduction in force to consider seniority as
{
a primary
}
the sole
factor
when
303 determining whether to terminate an employee.
10. Page 13, Lines 384 through 387 :
384 (b) The campus board of directors or the Utah College of Applied Technology Board
385 of Trustees may not establish a policy that requires an institution conducting a reduction in
386 force to consider seniority as
{
a primary
}
the sole
factor when determining whether to terminate an
387 employee.
11. Page 18, Line 526 :
526 67-19-18.5. Reductions in force -- Seniority may not be
{
primary
}
sole
factor.
12. Page 18, Lines 537 through 539 :
537 (2) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an employer conducting a reduction in
538 force may not consider seniority as
{
a primary
}
the sole
factor when determining whether to
terminate an
539 employee.
Page 1 of 2
LRGC victoriaashby victoriaashby N 02/14/12 11:49a