Download Zipped Amended WordPerfect SB0236.ZIP
[Introduced][Status][Bill Documents][Fiscal Note][Bills Directory]
S.B. 236
This document includes Senate Committee Amendments incorporated into the bill on Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 8:40 AM by rday. --> This document includes Senate 2nd Reading Floor Amendments incorporated into the bill on Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 5:21 PM by rday. --> 1
2
3
4
5
6
7 LONG TITLE
8 General Description:
9 This bill establishes a new type of mark, called an electronic registration mark, that may
10 not be used to trigger advertising for a competitor and creates a database for use in
11 administering marks.
12 Highlighted Provisions:
13 This bill:
14 . defines terms;
15 . addresses the fees for an electronic registration mark;
16 . prohibits the use of a registered electronic registration mark to trigger advertising
17 for a business, goods, or services of the same class as those represented by the
18 electronic registration mark;
19 . provides for the creation and maintenance of a database of marks, including:
20 . search functions; and
21 . management of electronic registration marks;
22 . provides for the use of excess funds to promote business-related activity; and
23 . makes technical changes.
24 Monies Appropriated in this Bill:
25 None
26 Other Special Clauses:
27 None
28
29 AMENDS:
30 70-3a-103, as enacted by Chapter 318, Laws of Utah 2002
31 70-3a-203, as enacted by Chapter 318, Laws of Utah 2002
32 70-3a-302, as enacted by Chapter 318, Laws of Utah 2002
33 70-3a-304, as enacted by Chapter 318, Laws of Utah 2002
34 70-3a-305, as enacted by Chapter 318, Laws of Utah 2002
35 70-3a-306, as enacted by Chapter 318, Laws of Utah 2002
36 70-3a-402, as enacted by Chapter 318, Laws of Utah 2002
37 ENACTS:
38 70-3a-501, Utah Code Annotated 1953
39 70-3a-502, Utah Code Annotated 1953
40
41 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
42 Section 1. Section 70-3a-103 is amended to read:
43 70-3a-103. Definitions -- Use -- Service marks.
44 (1) As used in this chapter:
45 (a) "Abandoned mark" means a mark whose:
46 (i) use has been discontinued with no intent to resume use; or
47 (ii) significance as a mark has been lost due to any course of conduct of the owner,
48 including acts of omission or commission.
49 (b) "Applicant" means:
50 (i) the person filing an application for registration of a mark under this chapter; and
51 (ii) a legal representative, successor, or assign of a person described in Subsection
52 (1)(b)(i).
53 (c) "Dilution" means the lessening of the capacity of a famous mark to identify and
54 distinguish goods or services, regardless of the presence or absence of:
55 (i) competition between the owner of the famous mark and another person; or
56 (ii) the likelihood of:
57 (A) confusion;
58 (B) mistake; or
59
60 (d) "Division" means the Division of Corporations and Commercial Code within the
61 Department of Commerce.
62 (e) (i) If the conditions of Subsection (1)(e)(ii) are met, "electronic registration mark"
63 means a word, term, or name that represents a business, goods, or a service.
64 (ii) The mark described in Subsection (1)(e)(i) is an electronic registration mark only if
65 it is:
66 (A) registered through the system described in Section 70-3a-501 ; and
67 (B) used by a person to identify and distinguish a business, goods, or a service of that
68 person from a business, product, or service of another person.
69 [
70 entitled to registration under this chapter whether or not the trademark [
71 electronic registration mark is registered.
72 [
73 (i) the person to whom the registration of a mark under this chapter is issued; and
74 (ii) a legal representative, successor, or assign of a person described in Subsection
75 (1)[
76 [
77 means:
78 (A) a word, term, name, symbol, design, or device; or
79 (B) any combination of words, terms, names, symbols, designs, or devices.
80 (ii) The mark described in Subsection (1)[
81 by a person:
82 (A) to identify and distinguish the services of one person from the services of others,
83 including a unique service; and
84 (B) to indicate the source of the services, even if that source is unknown.
85 [
86 (A) a word, term, name, symbol, design, or device; or
87 (B) any combination of words, terms, names, symbols, designs, or devices.
88 (ii) The mark described in Subsection (1)[
89 person:
90
91 sold by others, including a unique product; and
92 (B) to indicate the source of the goods, even if that source is unknown.
93 [
94 vocation of that person.
95 [
96 not made merely to reserve a right in a mark.
97 (2) For the purposes of this chapter, a mark is considered to be in use:
98 (a) on goods:
99 (i) when the mark is placed:
100 (A) in any manner on the goods or other containers;
101 (B) in any manner on displays associated with the goods or other containers;
102 (C) on the tags or labels affixed to the goods or other containers; or
103 (D) if the nature of the goods makes the placements referred to in Subsections
104 (2)(a)(i)(A) through (C) impracticable, on documents associated with the goods or the sale of
105 the goods; and
106 (ii) the goods are sold or transported in commerce in this state; and
107 (b) on services:
108 (i) when it is used or displayed in the sale or advertising of services; and
109 (ii) when the services are rendered in this state.
110 (3) For purposes of Subsection (1)(a):
111 (a) intent not to resume may be inferred from circumstances; and
112 (b) nonuse for two consecutive years is prima facie evidence of abandonment.
113 (4) Notwithstanding Subsection (1)[
114 marks notwithstanding that they may advertise the goods of the sponsor:
115 (a) titles;
116 (b) character names used by a person; and
117 (c) other distinctive features of:
118 (i) a radio program;
119 (ii) a television program; or
120 (iii) a program similar to a program described in Subsection (4)(c)(i) or (ii).
121
122 70-3a-203. Fees.
123 (1) (a) A regulatory fee, as defined in Section 63-38-3.2 , shall be determined by the
124 division in accordance with Section 63-38-3.2 , but may not exceed $250 annually for
125 registration of an electronic registration mark in a single class.
126 (b) A person who pays the annual regulatory fee for the registration of an electronic
127 registration mark may register additional classes for the same mark for an additional fee not to
128 exceed $25 annually.
129 (2) (a) For a fee authorized by this chapter that is not a regulatory fee, the division may
130 adopt a schedule of fees provided that each fee in the schedule of fees is:
131 (i) reasonable and fair; and
132 (ii) submitted to the Legislature as part of the Department of Commerce's annual
133 appropriations request.
134 (b) When a fee schedule described in Subsection (2)(a) is submitted as part of the
135 annual appropriations request, the Legislature, in a manner substantially similar to Section
136 63-38-3.2 , may for any fee in the fee schedule:
137 (i) approve the fee;
138 (ii) (A) increase or decrease the fee; and
139 (B) approve the fee as changed by the Legislature; or
140 (iii) reject the fee.
141 (c) A fee approved by the Legislature pursuant to this section shall be deposited in a
142 restricted account within the General Fund known as the Commerce Service Fund.
143 Section 3. Section 70-3a-302 is amended to read:
144 70-3a-302. Application for registration.
145 (1) (a) Subject to the limitations in this chapter, any person who uses a mark may file
146 with the division an application for registration of that mark.
147 (b) The registration described in Subsection (1)(a) shall be filed in accordance with
148 rules:
149 (i) made by the division in accordance with Section 70-3a-201 ; and
150 (ii) that are consistent with this section.
151 (c) The application shall:
152
153 (A) the name and business address of the person applying for registration;
154 (B) if a corporation, the state of incorporation; and
155 (C) if a partnership:
156 (I) the state where the partnership is organized; and
157 (II) the names of the general partners, as specified by the division;
158 (ii) specify:
159 (A) the goods or services on or in connection with which the mark is used;
160 (B) the mode or manner in which the mark is used on or in connection with those
161 goods or services; and
162 (C) the class defined pursuant to Section 70-3a-308 in which those goods or services
163 fall;
164 (iii) state:
165 (A) the date when the mark was first used anywhere;
166 (B) the date when the mark was first used in this state by the applicant or a predecessor
167 in interest;
168 (C) that the applicant is the owner of the mark;
169 (D) that the mark is in use; and
170 (E) that to the knowledge of the person verifying the application, no other person has
171 registered, either federally or in this state, or has the right to use that mark:
172 (I) in the mark's identical form; or
173 (II) in such near resemblance to the mark as to be likely, when applied to the goods or
174 services of the other person, to cause confusion, mistake, or to deceive;
175 (iv) be signed under penalty of perjury by:
176 (A) the applicant; or
177 (B) if the applicant is not an individual:
178 (I) an officer of the applicant; or
179 (II) a partner of a partnership;
180 (v) be filed with the division;
181 (vi) be accompanied by two specimens showing the mark as actually used; and
182 (vii) be accompanied by a regulatory fee as determined by the division in accordance
183
184 (d) In addition to the information required by Subsection (1)(c), the division may
185 require the applicant to provide:
186 (i) a statement as to whether an application to register the mark, or portions or a
187 composite of the mark, has been filed by the applicant or a predecessor in interest in the United
188 States Patent and Trademark Office; or
189 (ii) a drawing of the mark, complying with the requirements the division may specify.
190 (2) If the division requires the statement under Subsection (1)(d)(i), the applicant shall
191 provide full information with respect to any application filed with the United States Patent and
192 Trademark Office including:
193 (a) the filing date and serial number of the application;
194 (b) the status of the application; and
195 (c) if any application was finally refused registration or has otherwise not resulted in a
196 registration, the reasons for the refusal or lack of registration.
197 (3) Any materials, information, or signatures required to file an application for an
198 electronic registration mark may be provided through the database created under Section
199 70-3a-501 .
200 Section 4. Section 70-3a-304 is amended to read:
201 70-3a-304. Certification of registration.
202 (1) If an applicant fully complies with this chapter, the division shall:
203 (a) certify the registration; and
204 (b) provide to the applicant documentation that the registration is certified.
205 (2) The documentation described in Subsection (1) shall:
206 (a) be affixed to the application of the applicant; or
207 (b) include the information that is required to be in an application under Subsections
208 70-3a-302 (1)(c)(i) through (iii).
209 (3) The following are admissible in evidence as competent and sufficient proof of the
210 registration of the particular mark in any action or judicial proceeding in any court of this state:
211 (a) the documentation described in Subsection (1)(b) that is provided by the division;
212 or
213 (b) a copy of the documentation described in Subsection (1)(b) if the copy is certified
214
215 (4) Documentation of the certification of an electronic registration mark shall be
216 provided through the database created under Section 70-3a-501 .
217 Section 5. Section 70-3a-305 is amended to read:
218 70-3a-305. Duration and renewal.
219 (1) The registration of a mark under this chapter expires five years after the date the
220 division certifies the registration under Section 70-3a-304 .
221 (2) A registration may be renewed for an additional five years from the date a
222 registration expires if the registrant:
223 (a) files an application with the division:
224 (i) at least six months before the expiration of the registration; and
225 (ii) in accordance with the requirements made by rule by the division:
226 (A) pursuant to Section 70-3a-201 ; and
227 (B) consistent with this section; and
228 (b) pays a renewal regulatory fee determined by the division in accordance with
229 Section 70-3a-203 .
230 (3) If a registrant complies with this section, the registrant may renew a mark at the
231 expiration of each five-year term.
232 (4) (a) A registration in effect before May 6, 2002:
233 (i) shall continue in full force and effect for the registration's unexpired term; and
234 (ii) may be renewed by:
235 (A) filing an application for renewal with the division:
236 (I) within six months before the expiration of the registration; and
237 (II) in accordance with rules made by the division pursuant to Section 70-3a-201 ; and
238 (B) paying the required renewal regulatory fee determined by the division in
239 accordance with Section 70-3a-203 .
240 (b) If a registration in effect before May 6, 2002, is renewed in accordance with this
241 Subsection (4), the registration shall be renewed for a term of five years.
242 (5) Any application for renewal under this chapter, whether a registration made under
243 this chapter or a registration made under a prior Utah statute, shall include:
244 (a) a verified statement that the mark has been and is still in use; and
245
246 services; or
247 (ii) a verified statement that the mark has not changed.
248 (6) (a) An electronic registration mark is valid for one year from the day on which the
249 electronic registration mark is registered.
250 (b) Registration of an electronic registration mark may be renewed annually by paying
251 the fee for renewing an electronic registration mark described in Section 70-3a-203 .
252 (c) An electronic registration mark that is not renewed reverts to a trademark and
253 expires five years after the day on which the mark was originally certified unless renewed
254 under Subsection (2).
255 (d) Any existing trademark or service mark that otherwise qualifies for registration as
256 an electronic registration mark may be converted to an electronic registration mark by paying
257 the electronic registration mark fee under Section 70-3a-203 .
258 Section 6. Section 70-3a-306 is amended to read:
259 70-3a-306. Assignments -- Changes of name -- Other instruments -- Security
260 interests -- Acknowledgments.
261 (1) (a) A mark and the mark's registration under this chapter is assignable with:
262 (i) the good will of the business in which the mark is used; or
263 (ii) that part of the good will of the business connected with the use of and symbolized
264 by the mark.
265 (b) An assignment under this section:
266 (i) shall be:
267 (A) in writing; and
268 (B) properly executed; and
269 (ii) may be filed with the division by:
270 (A) filing a form provided by the division; and
271 (B) paying of a fee determined by the division in accordance with Section 70-3a-203 .
272 (c) Upon the filing of an assignment, the division shall certify that the assignment has
273 been filed.
274 (d) An assignment of any registration under this chapter is void as against any
275 subsequent purchaser for valuable consideration without notice, unless the assignment is filed
276
277 (i) within three months after the date of the assignment; or
278 (ii) [
279 (2) Any registrant or applicant may change the name of the person or business to whom
280 the mark is issued or for whom an application is filed by:
281 (a) filing two copies of a certificate of change of name of the registrant or applicant
282 with the division; and
283 (b) paying of a fee determined by the division in accordance with Section 70-3a-203 .
284 (3) (a) A person may file another instrument that relates to a mark registered or
285 application pending under this chapter:
286 (i) in the discretion of the division; and
287 (ii) if the instrument is:
288 (A) in writing; and
289 (B) properly executed.
290 (b) An instrument that may be filed under this Subsection (3) includes:
291 (i) a license;
292 (ii) a security interest; or
293 (iii) a mortgage.
294 (4) An acknowledgment by the assignor or person whose interest in a mark is adversely
295 effected by the instrument:
296 (a) is prima facie evidence of the execution of an assignment or other instrument; and
297 (b) when filed by the division, [
298 execution of the assignment or other instrument.
299 (5) An assignment and a name change of an electronic registration mark may be made
300 through the database created under Section 70-3a-501 .
301 Section 7. Section 70-3a-402 is amended to read:
302 70-3a-402. Infringement.
303 (1) Subject to Section 70-3a-104 and Subsection (2), any person is liable in a civil
304 action brought by the registrant for any and all of the remedies provided in Section 70-3a-404 ,
305 if that person:
306 (a) uses a reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a mark registered
307
308 (i) without the consent of the registrant; and
309 (ii) in connection with the sale, distribution, offering for sale, or advertising of any
310 goods or services on or in connection with which that use is likely to cause confusion, mistake,
311 or to deceive as to the source of origin, nature, or quality of those goods or services; [
312 (b) reproduces, counterfeits, copies, or colorably imitates any mark and applies the
313 reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation to labels, signs, prints, packages,
314 wrappers, receptacles, or advertisements intended to be used upon or in connection with the
315 sale or other distribution in this state of goods or services[
316 (c) uses an electronic registration mark to cause the delivery or display of an
317 advertisement for a business, goods, or a service:
318 (i) of the same class, as defined in Section 70-3a-308 , other than the business, goods,
319 or service of the registrant of the electronic registration mark; or
320 (ii) if that advertisement is likely to cause confusion between the business, goods, or
321 service of the registrant of the electronic registration mark and the business, goods, or service
322 advertised.
323 (2) Under Subsection (1)(b), the registrant is not entitled to recover profits or damages
324 unless the act described in Subsection (1)(b) has been committed with the intent:
325 (a) to cause confusion or mistake; or
326 (b) to deceive.
327 (3) For a violation of Subsection (1)(c), the person whose business, goods, or service is
328 advertised, and the person who sells or displays the advertisement are liable if:
329 (a) the advertisement is at any time displayed in the state; or
330 (b) the advertiser or person selling the advertisement is located in the state.
331 Section 8. Section 70-3a-501 is enacted to read:
332
333 70-3a-501. Searchable mark database.
334 (1) The division shall maintain a database that enables a user to:
335 (a) file an application to register an electronic registration mark;
336 (b) manage existing electronic registration marks owned by the user; and
337 (c) search for any registered marks.
338
338a database.
338b S. (b) If the division contracts with a person to maintain and operate the database, the person
338c with whom the division contracts may, at the discretion of the division, be responsible for all
338d costs of creating the database and readying it for use. .S
339 (3) The database required by Subsection (1) shall be:
340 (a) funded by fees collected for the registration of electronic registration marks; and
341 (b) accessible online through the state's Internet website.
342 (4) For all registered marks, the database shall include:
343 (a) the date of a mark's registration;
344 (b) an indication of the mark's status as active or otherwise;
345 (c) any class for which the mark is registered; and
346 (d) the name of the registrant.
347 (5) A search of the information in the database that is listed in Subsection (4) shall be
348 available free to any user, without regard to whether the user has an account for use of the
349 database.
350 (6) The division may provide other services in connection with the database, for which
351 the division may charge a user.
352 (7) A person registering an electronic registration mark shall be given an account
353 through which the person may access the database to:
354 (a) review the status of a mark;
355 (b) pay any fee; and
356 (c) renew, revoke, and assign any electronic registration mark.
357 (8) (a) The database shall provide a mechanism allowing a person to seek permission
358 from the registrant to use a registered electronic registration mark.
359 (b) The database shall allow, through use of the database, a registrant whose
360 permission is requested under Subsection (8)(a) to approve, disapprove, or approve with a time
361 limitation the request.
362 (c) (i) The division may charge a fee for a request for permission to use an electronic
363 registration mark under this Subsection (8).
364 (ii) No fee may be charged to the registrant from whom permission to use a mark is
365 requested.
366 (9) The creation of the database does not affect the registration of and fees for a
367 trademark or service mark.
368 Section 9. Section 70-3a-502 is enacted to read:
369
370 Any funds collected from the registration of a mark under this chapter or the use of the
371 database in excess of the expense of maintaining the database shall be retained as dedicated
372 credits to be used by the division to:
373 (1) promote the registration of electronic registration marks to holders of federal
374 trademarks;
375 (2) promote the state as a desirable location for business; and
376 (3) provide incentives to businesses considering relocation to the state.
Legislative Review Note
as of 2-14-07 4:51 PM
As required by legislative rule and practice, the Office of Legislative Research and General
Counsel provides the following legislative review note to assist the Legislature in making its own
determination as to the constitutionality of the bill. The note is based on an analysis of relevant state
and federal constitutional law as applied to the bill. The note is not written for the purpose of
influencing whether the bill should become law, but is written to provide information relevant to
legislators' consideration of this bill. The note is not a substitute for the judgment of the judiciary,
which has authority to determine the constitutionality of a law in the context of a specific case.
This legislation allows the registration of an electronic mark that would prohibit the triggering
of an advertisement for a competitor. The most prominent application for this type of mark is the use
of user-entered search terms in an Internet search engine to trigger advertisements. These triggered
advertisements are often advertisements for a competitor of an entity whose name is entered in the
search engine by a potential customer. Because of the potential impact on interstate commerce from
the state's regulation of electronic registration mark use on Internet search engines, this legislation has
a high probability of being held to be unconstitutional.
The Commerce Clause to the United States Constitution provides that Congress has the
power to regulate interstate commerce. (U.S. Const. art. I, sec. 8). This provision also has a
"dormant" aspect that "prohibits state . . . regulation that discriminates against or unduly burdens
interstate commerce." General Motors Corp. v. Tracy, 519 U.S. 278, 287 (1997) (Citations omitted).
Although the dormant aspect of the Commerce Clause is not implicated when Congress has delegated
its power to regulate in an area to the states, that delegation "must be either 'expressly stated' or
'made unmistakably clear.'" New York State Dairy Foods, Inc. v. Northeast Dairy Compact Comm'n,
198 F.3d 1, 20 (citations omitted). Further, this delegation must be specific to that state action
challenged. See Ind. Community Bankers Ass'n v. Bd. of Comm'rs of the Fed. Reserve Sys., 838
F.2d 969, 973-77 (8th Cir. 1988) (holding that although Congress authorized states to allow a bank's
acquisition by out-of-state entity, Congress did not authorize restrictions on acquired banks).
In the context of this legislation, there has been no specific delegation by Congress of the
authority to regulate the type of Internet advertising that this legislation targets, whether triggered by
an electronic registration mark or any other method. Thus, the dormant Commerce Clause is
implicated and the legislation will be analyzed to determine whether it places a burden on interstate
commerce that outweighs the state's benefit. ACLU v. Johnson, 194 F.3d 1149, 1161 (10th Cir.
1999).
This legislation applies to an electronic mark registered in Utah that is used to trigger an advertisement if the advertisement is delivered in Utah or if the advertiser or person selling the advertisement is located in Utah. A large Internet search engine must first determine whether a user is located within Utah. If the user is in Utah, the Internet search engine must check search terms against Utah's registry of trademarks to prevent the unlawful triggering of advertising. Literally millions of search requests from locations worldwide each day would be subject to verification of location. Once verified, the search engine would then use a separate process for delivering advertising to Utah. This results in multiple systems of advertisement for a search engine to manage.
It is plausible that a search engine might merely decide to check all searches against the state's registry
to avoid the need to ascertain the location of each user. This would be strong evidence of the
magnitude of the burden of verifying the location of each user and of the interstate impact of this
legislation. See, e.g., Id. (stating "the nature of the Internet forecloses the argument that [the statute]
applies only to intrastate communications."). Whether deciding to verify a user's location or to
merely check the registry with each search, any benefit to the state from this legislation is likely
substantially outweighed by the burden on every Internet search engine or similar system to re-
engineer its systems and constantly check the search terms or the location of a user. This is likely the
case even with advances in technology that make it easier to determine a user's location.
In ACLU v. Johnson, the Tenth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held that a New Mexico statute
that prohibited the dissemination of material harmful to minors by computer violated the Commerce
Clause because it applied to material that was being disseminated over the Internet. Id. at 1152,
1161-63. This legislation is not dissimilar from the laws struck down in ACLU v. Johnson, in that it
has the effect of requiring entities outside of Utah to verify the location of a user or ensure that all
content complies with Utah law. Additionally, the benefit to the state from this legislation is likely
less than in ACLU v. Johnson, which dealt with the protection of minors from pornography. Thus, in
addition to regulating conduct outside of Utah, this legislation also likely provides a benefit that is
substantially outweighed by the burdens on interstate commerce. For these reasons, this legislation
has a high probability of being held to be unconstitutional.