Fiscal Highlights - June 2013
Per Pupil Expenditures: National Comparisons Show Utah Spends Between $6,064 and $8,122 per Pupil -
Ben Leishman (![]() A state's per pupil expenditure (PPE) has become one of the most common data points used to compare educational systems across the country. To some degree, this measure is used to evaluate a state's relative commitment to K-12 education. However, as an input measure, PPE fails to consider the outcomes achieved by a state's educational system and the relative cost differentials across the country. This brief puts aside the limitations of using PPE as a performance measure, in order to focus on the various sources for PPE data and highlight their differences. Comparability across states becomes important when looking at PPE data. The range of expenditures in the title of this brief highlights this importance. Depending on the data used and the entity that developed the national comparison, the resulting PPE figures can vary dramatically, and each result is not comparable to the other. The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) is the primary source for the data used to develop PPE calculations. NCES is part of the U.S. Department of Education and is the federal entity charged with collecting and analyzing data reported by the states. State education agencies (SEAs) compile state and local financial information and submit the information to NCES using NCES reporting standards. NCES then develops a series of reports using this data, including per pupil expenditures. The following terms will assist in understanding NCES data:
The U.S. Census Bureau and the National Education
Association (NEA) also produce per pupil expenditure comparisons. The Census Bureau uses NCES data in their
calculation. Instead of Current
Expenditures, the Census Bureau uses the term Regardless of the terminology, each organization is trying to develop consistent data to ensure comparability across states. Often, per pupil expenditure comparisons exclude expenditures on capital outlay, debt service, pre-k programs (unless the funding goes to a local education agency and is for instructional purposes), adult education programs, and state level administration. Excluded expenditures are often noted in the footnotes of each comparison. Depending on the three major national comparisons of per pupil expenditures, Utah spent an amount ranging from $6,064 to $8,122 in FY 2010 as detailed below: National Center for Education Statistics5
United States Census Bureau6
National Education Association7
In conclusion, each of these comparisons represents an accurate calculation of what Utah spends per pupil based on the definitions used to develop each comparison. Each organization consistently uses their set of definitions and data collection methodologies to allow for comparisons across time. However, given the range of possible amounts, it is difficult to fully weigh how much Utah spends per pupil using these comparisons alone. Notes: [1]
Digest of Education Statistics: 2010.
Appendix B: Definitions. National Center for Education Statistics, April
2011.
[2]
Ibid.
[3]
Ibid.
[4]
Public Education Finances: 2011. Government Division Reports. United States
Census Bureau, May 2013.
[5]
Digest of Education Statistics. National Center for Education Statistics.
Tables prepared January 2013.
[6] 2010
Annual Survey of Local Government Finances [7]
Rankings of the States 2012. National Education Association. |
![]() $119 m in Future Buildings "Phase" Funded - Mark Bleazard A new law improves financial management for state buildings by recognizing the full cost of a ...$2.6 Million Spent on Carp Removal So Far, What Are The Results? - Ivan D. Djambov The carp is identified as the greatest obstacle for recovering the endangered June Sucker in Utah L...AGRC Delivers Cadastral Grant Contracts/Funding to Locals - Gary K. Ricks The Automated Geographic Reference Center (AGRC) is a division within the Department of Technology ...Division of Juvenile Justice Services Proposes $11million Multi-use Facility - Zackery N. King The Board of Juvenile Justice Services most recently met on Thursday, May 30, 2013. Among ot...Employment and Wage Growth - Andrea Wilko Overall Utah's economy is improving. Businesses in Utah continue to create jobs at more than ...Federal FY 2013 Budget Deficit Estimate Has Dropped to $642 Billion - Steven M. Allred The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has revised its FY 2013 federal deficit estimate...Higher Education Enrollment Dips - Spencer C. Pratt Enrollment in the Utah System of Higher Education dropped for the spring semester. The Spring...Impact of Recent Federal Tax Changes on Utah Residents and Government - Thomas E. Young By how much will the recent federal tax increases reduce disposable income to residents of the stat...Medicaid Used 23% of all the State's General Fund in FY 2012 - Russell T. Frandsen In FY 2012, the Medicaid program in Utah spent $484,499,800 General Fund and $5,322,300 Education F...New Fiscal Note System - Stan Eckersley The Legislature has a new fiscal note system that it will use in the next general session. There we...Per Pupil Expenditures: National Comparisons Show Utah Spends Between $6,064 and $8,122 per Pupil - Ben Leishman A state's per pupil expenditure (PPE) has become one of the most common data points used to compare...Revenue Forecast - June 2013 - Andrea Wilko A consensus range forecast for June 2013 indicates that revenues will be between $135 million to $1...Special Administrative Expense Account $5.0 Million Less Than Stated - Stephen C. Jardine In the 2013 General Session, the Legislature appropriated $6.7 million from the Special Administrat...Tooele ATC New Building - Angela J. Oh On June 5th, 2013, Tooele Applied Technology College (TATC) had a ribbon cutting ceremony and open ... |
Reports/Archive | Budget Process | Office Background | Who's Who | Organization Chart
Office of the Legislative
Fiscal Analyst
House Building, Suite W310
Salt Lake City, UT 84114
Phone (801) 538-1034 Fax (801) 538-1692